Reply With Quote
That story about that guy trying to get Clinton emails and who claimed to know Flynn is riveting. Conveniently dead.
he should take a reset button
That story about that guy trying to get Clinton emails and who claimed to know Flynn is riveting. Conveniently dead.
DarrinS semen shielding on cue reflexively but of course he doesn't even like Trump.
Those investigators have examined reports from intelligence agencies that describe Russian hackers discussing how to obtain emails from Mrs. Clinton’s server and then transmit them to Mr. Flynn via an intermediary, according to U.S. officials with knowledge of the intelligence.
they got you pegged, darrin.
Hillary strike again!
Let me see if I understand the best (so far) case of collusion with Russia
1. Some 81 year old man was trying to get Hillary emails from hackers
2. He allegedly knew Flynn and/or Flynn's son
3. He's now dead
4. Said emails were never hacked or released (hard to release, when not hacked)
5. In dream scenario, Flynn convicted of something
6. Trump still POTUS
Am I missing anything?
yes. that they got you pegged.
*roasted*
https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-ope...70851?mod=e2twIn the interview with the Journal, Mr. Smith said he and his colleagues found five groups of hackers who claimed to possess Mrs. Clinton’s deleted emails, including two groups he determined were Russians.
“We knew the people who had these were probably around the Russian government,” Mr. Smith said.
...................
Mr. Smith and one of his associates said they had a line of communication with Mr. Flynn and his consulting company.
In one Smith email reviewed by the Journal, intended to entice outside experts to join his work, he offered to make introductions to Mr. Flynn’s son, Michael G. Flynn, who worked as chief of staff in his father’s company. Mr. Smith’s email mentioned the son among a small number of other people he said were helping.
Michael G. Flynn didn’t respond to a request for comment.
In another recruiting email seen by the Journal, Jonathan Safron, a law student Mr. Smith described as a close colleague, included links to the websites and LinkedIn profiles of people purportedly working with the Smith team. At the top of the list was the name and website of Flynn Intel, which Mr. Flynn set up after his 2014 firing as director of the Defense Intelligence Agency.
Mr. Safron declined to comment on his email or Mr. Smith’s project.
In phone conversations, Mr. Smith told a computer expert he was in direct contact with Mr. Flynn and his son, according to this expert. The person said an anti-Clinton research do ent prepared by Mr. Smith’s group identified the younger Mr. Flynn as someone associated with the effort. The expert said that based on his conversations with Mr. Smith, he understood the elder Mr. Flynn to be coordinating with Mr. Smith’s group in his capacity as a Trump campaign adviser.
The senior Mr. Flynn was fired as national-security adviser in February after misleading administration officials about his conversations with the Russian ambassador concerning sanctions. Those conversations put Mr. Flynn under scrutiny by the FBI and then the special counsel, according to U.S. officials.
You are not a reliable source for this and no one should ever rely on your retellings and recollections.
I like how you try to down play Smith because he was old as if he had not been an active GOP actor for 4 decades. And you also left out the part where Flynn, Manafort, Sessions, and Kushner lied in disclosure forms and interviews about payments and meeting with Russia and Russian state agencies as well as Trump's multiple instances of obstruction of the investigation.
But I guess this is what it is going to be: you semen shielding every revelation, pretending that instance is the only semen you've swallowed, pretending that there is not an ongoing investigation, and then pretending that you don't support Trump. I bet you even continue to claim there is no evidence of collusion.
^meh, I've already said in another thread that Trump should resign.
Collusion theory still bull .
What was bull was your restating what the article said as evidence of collusion.
That is what you do. Make one pla ude in an assertion that you think makes you seem objective and then make every argument in opposition to that stance and pay nothing but lip service in support.
It is just like when you said you used to believe in AGW and like that. You are a pandering, sophist, lying sack of . Been consistent with it for a decade too.
McCabe took 6 million dollars from the Clintons for his wife to run for office. Comey was bought off also.
You have link for these?
No she took money from the VA governor who they are labeling an ally of Clinton.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...nflicts-240089
Youre as bad as TSA and Darrin are rehashing articles and news.Grassley noted that the Justice Department inspector general is investigating whether McCabe should have recused himself from the Hillary Clinton email probe, since McCabe’s wife got donations from Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton ally, when she ran for a Virginia state Senate seat.
Grassley also hit McCabe over a gender-discrimination complaint filed against the FBI. The senator said Flynn filed a letter of support for the FBI agent who reported the discrimination.
The corrections keep on coming. How many thousand times did they quote this 17 agency bull
Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/2....co/Z2Pm19X9rQ
pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza pizza
the feels
Whoops.The corrections keep on coming. How many thousand times did they quote this 17 agency bull
Correction: June 29, 2017
A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/06/2....co/Z2Pm19X9rQ
So basically the article is still correct. Instead of all 17 agencies, it was only 4.
LOL big whoops.
Yup, everyone and their dog was using the 17 agencies thingy when the Russian nonsense started. It was their ace on the hole. God, it never gets old winning.
Hah! Chris think he winning.
lol Terry McAuliffe being "labeled" an ally of Clinton.
There are currently 12 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 12 guests)
Posting Permissions
