not sure what you're laughing at exactly... maybe the fact that your privacy isn't private and big gov thinks it has the right to check in on you at any time of day. either way, i think that's bs and we should all be upset and not LOL'ing because you just want to laugh at those who don't share your same ideals.
Which part?
There's no proof of that.
Unless you got some proof.
Debunked. Facts.
FISA evidence.
Somehow they fooled the judge!
EXCLUSIVE: House Intel Committee Has Received All Docs On Trump Dossier From DOJ, FBI
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence members gained access to all Department of Justice and FBI do ents it possesses on the Trump dossier, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.
The committee was able to review Friday all FBI and DOJ do ents on the Trump dossier, former MI-6 British agent Christopher Steele who authored the dossier, and Fusion GPS, the political opposition firm that hired Steele. DOJ also provided any Obama administration applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court based on the dossier, which could approve the surveillance of the Trump transition team or Trump associates, according to a source with direct knowledge of the case.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/08/ex..._medium=Social
The Unraveling
McCarthy makes a pretty strong case that parts of the dossier appear to have been used to persuade a FISC judge.
Is that “making up”?
EXCLUSIVE: House Intel Committee Has Received All Docs On Trump Dossier From DOJ, FBI
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence members gained access to all Department of Justice and FBI do ents it possesses on the Trump dossier, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned.
The committee was able to review Friday all FBI and DOJ do ents on the Trump dossier, former MI-6 British agent Christopher Steele who authored the dossier, and Fusion GPS, the political opposition firm that hired Steele. DOJ also provided any Obama administration applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court based on the dossier, which could approve the surveillance of the Trump transition team or Trump associates, according to a source with direct knowledge of the case.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/08/ex..._medium=Social
The Unraveling
Well, I guess we’ll find out soon.
He's acting as if he's right without a doubt and that nothing in the dossier at all was confirmed -- and fooled a FISC judge into accepting it without question.
How likely do you think that is, Darrin? Take a stand for once.
A FISC judge wouldn’t need to be fooled if the judge was corrupt and in on it. With Nunes receiving all FISA do ents we’ll soon find out who signed off on the FISA warrant. My money is on Obama appointee Rudolph Contreras, the same judge who recused himself from the Mike Flynn case.
im confused though. i thought flynn committing a felony and pleading guilty was all part of the plan? so if you think this FISC judge is corrupt and was in on it, then according to your own grand conspiracy theory, this judge was "in" on the plan devised by Trump and Flynn
trump is going down
Based on everything known and the timeline, I’d say pretty likely.
You said Obama did it. And you were wrong.
im confused though. i thought flynn committing a felony and pleading guilty was all part of the plan? so if you think this FISC judge is corrupt and was in on it, then according to your own grand conspiracy theory, this judge was "in" on the plan devised by Trump and Flynn
on his clock... his problem.
Where is your proof Obama wiretapped?
so check it... if it wasn't obama(his administration), then who was it and who's administration? we can go around and around but we'll end up nowhere.
I asked you. Where is your proof? You have not provided any.
you're serious? so we're going to just act like obama was sitting there and unbeknownst to him these agencies were just spying left and right on trump and citizens nationally?
So the conspiracy goes even deeper!
lol
Republican Senators Raise Possible Charges Against Author of Trump Dossier
More than a year after Republican leaders promised to investigate Russian interference in the presidential election,
two influential Republicans on Friday made the first known congressional criminal referral in connection with the meddling —
against one of the people who sought to expose it.
Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a senior committee member, told the Justice Department that
they had reason to believe that a former British spy, Christopher Steele, lied to federal authorities about his contacts with reporters regarding information in a dossier,
and they urged the department to investigate.
The committee is running one of three congressional investigations into Russian election meddling, and its inquiry has come to focus on, in part,
Mr. Steele’s explosive dossier that purported to detail Russia’s interference and the Trump campaign’s complicity.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/u...committee.html
Adm. Mike Rogers, a true Patriot.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
