i'm the re huh but you're the one who has no stance whatsoever. keep taking your cues from cnn.
If memory serves you never responded. Feel free to point out where you picked up on my "offer me money" tack.
As I said, I don't bet, which is good, because if I had taken your offer, you would not be here to mock mercilessly. Where would the fun be in that?
Oooh look, he learned a new acronym. He's so cute.
funny how these hacks hate conspiracies but they're so entangled in one at the moment and don't realize it or do realize it and dismiss it at the same time. but we're all the crazy ones, not them. right... bunch of holier-than-thou face losers.
yall butt ers are all the same. nose in the air because your stinks to high heaven.
I don't believe anything 100%, but yes, I think that is more likely than not.
I give it about a 60% probability, lacking more definite evidence, I would not assign it higher.
I am curious to see what Trump will do about Syria and recent Russian moves. If he criticizes Putin, or acts in a substantive way to counter Russian interests, I will be happy to drop it.
To date though, Trump has said NOTHING that really criticizes Putin other than saying Russia was "not helpful" when it comes to North Korea.
"thanks for kicking our staff out" bootlicking nothwithstanding.
Aw, that is the most syllables I have seen you string together in a while. Try this one: disestablishmentarianism.
The Curious Case of Adam Schiff
Has there ever been a more incurious congressman than Adam Schiff ?
The California Democrat serves as ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, a powerful oversight panel. Recently this committee succeeded in wresting key do ents from the Justice Department and FBI after months of being stonewalled, and Republican staffers have summarized the info in a classified four-page memo. Those who have read the memo say it includes evidence of abuses by Justice and FBI officials handling the investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged ties with Russia, most salaciously summed up in the infamous Steele dossier named for the former British spy who compiled it.
But whether it’s material submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for a warrant on a Trump campaign official or conveniently missing texts between an FBI agent and his FBI mistress—who both hated Mr. Trump and would each serve on the special counsel’s team—Mr. Schiff exhibits no interest. Saturday on CNN he implied that the only ones who are interested are Russian bots on Twitter .
When CNN’s Ana Cabrera asked him why not let the American people see the info and decide for themselves, Mr. Schiff went full Jack Nicholson : “The American people, unfortunately, don’t have the underlying materials and therefore they can’t see how distorted and misleading this do ent is,” he answered. Translation: The American people can’t handle the truth.
It makes no sense. If the American people lack context, that’s an argument for more disclosure, not less. But it fits a pattern. Mr. Schiff tells us there is “more than cir stantial evidence” of collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow. But he never produces it.
To put it another way, Mr. Schiff appears to be the only man in America who doesn’t seem to want to know whether the material in the Steele dossier is true or not. All along he has stood against getting relevant information—fighting subpoenas for Justice, fighting subpoenas for the FBI, and fighting the subpoena for the bank records of Fusion GPS (which ultimately prompted the admission that the Clinton campaign had helped fund the Steele dossier).
Last week offered a good example of the Schiff standard in operation. Democrats wanted the House testimony of Fusion co-founder Glenn Simpson made public, and Republicans on the Intel committee joined them to vote in favor of releasing it. But when it came to making the classified memo available to any congressman who wished to read it, Republicans alone stood for transparency. Every Democrat, led by Mr. Schiff, voted to keep the memo secret.
On the Saturday following this vote, the chairmen of three key House oversight committees— Devin Nunes (Intel), Bob Goodlatte (Judiciary) and Trey Gowdy (Oversight)—met to discuss the way forward. They released no statement. But as more of their members see the memo, the rumbling to make the information public will only grow.
Meanwhile, even Democrats not on the Intel Committee have been infected by the same lack of curiosity that afflicts Mr. Schiff. In the few days since the memo became available to every member of the House, roughly 190 Republicans have read it, compared with only a dozen Democrats.
Congress—especially the oversight committees—is supposed to act as the people’s watchdog. Mr. Trump is routinely slammed for his indifference to reading, especially the endless memos and policy papers that find their way onto a president’s desk. But what does it say when the ranking member of a vital oversight committee appears uninterested in what his committee has unearthed about a matter that speaks to the integrity of our highest ins utions of law enforcement?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-cur...iff-1516666197
So you don't actually know what my position is and has been and you are just lying again.
You got called out and exposed.
lol whatever face
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
MUH MEMO
So many good quotes to bring up when the floodgates open on this farce of an investigation
So many good quotes to bring up when the floodgates open on this farce of an investigationYou would have to know our positions on the investigation before you could mock us.
I figured we'd just cut the bull of going back and forth 20 more posts with you claiming I had your position wrong. Here is your chance to state your position.
So you don't actually know what my position is and has been and you are just lying again.
You got called out and exposed.
Sorry, you've been acting like you've known it all along.
And now you're walking back.
Running, actually.
lol
state it and stop trying to collect more of a post count instead. live up to your convictions.
Don't state your position then doesn't bother me. You still have a place reserved on the tree of woe.
Reck your boy Manu bringing the bad news
is this the part where you never claimed fusion gps was the contractor?
Manu is not my boy.
But release them. I'm curious to see what's in there even if it's written by a Nunes shill.
Get ready for...that was a prediction. Not what I actually think.
That is a direct quote already linked in the thread. Try again.
and yet you went ahead and separately posted that quote again.
but you totally don't endorse the quote
You guys about muh walls of text.
You even quoted the article it came from dip . My next two posts came directly from the article you quoted that was linked.
yes, and according to Salon trump is getting impeached!
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
