Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[Ball Buster]

?

TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION


I mean a woman went to prison for leaking the NSA report on Russian interference.

Did they ever find any evidence of Russian interference in the election?

[ChumpDumper]

Did they ever find any evidence of Russian interference in the election?

is TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION somehow ambiguous to you?

[Ball Buster]

is TOP-SECRET NSA REPORT DETAILS RUSSIAN HACKING EFFORT DAYS BEFORE 2016 ELECTION somehow ambiguous to you?

“the types of systems we observed Russian actors targeting or compromising are not involved in vote tallying.”

So there was a detailed report... with no evidence.

[spurraider21]

So there was a detailed report... with no evidence.

there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

[Ball Buster]

there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016

[ChumpDumper]

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016

You do know that social media accounts are free, right?

Please acknowledge that you know this.

[koriwhat]

Exactly. They can flood the internet with ad purchases too. Amirite?

Russian accounts spent a total of $4,700 on Google ads in 2016

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4766980/user-clip-russian-accounts-spent-total-4700-google-ads-2016

lol and bloomberg is in a 100m hole rn with ads... he should've worked with the russians.

[ChumpDumper]

Are you guys actively trying to look stupid?

Serious question.

[Ball Buster]

You do know that social media accounts are free, right?

Please acknowledge that you know this.

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.

[spurraider21]

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.

how about the DNC email leak?

[ChumpDumper]

Sure, everyone can use Facebook. Were the Russian troll farms that vast, did they really impact the election through social media?

There's evidence the Russian troll farms were a very small outfit, very overstated by US media.

Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

I wouldn't even be sure it would take that many people to make bots and generate/amplify misinformation.

[ChumpDumper]

how about the DNC email leak?

Seth Rich, obviously.

[Ball Buster]

Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

What are you saying happened in the 2016 election. Trump won because of Russian influence on our election? What did they do?

[Ball Buster]

Evidence from whom?

I'll take the link to that, thanks.

I wouldn't even be sure it would take that many people to make bots and generate/amplify misinformation.

This is your Russian troll farm. The building that changed the results of our election.

https://www.npr.org/sections/paralle...-as-a-soap-ope

[ChumpDumper]

This is your Russian troll farm. The building that changed the results of our election.

https://www.npr.org/sections/paralle...-as-a-soap-ope

your goalpost moves.

How big did you expect it to be?

Pentagon-sized?

WTC-sized?

[ChumpDumper]

What are you saying happened in the 2016 election. Trump won because of Russian influence on our election? What did they do?

I'm saying they did what the NSA and other agencies said they did.

You started out saying the NSA found no evidence of interference whatsoever. You've been backtracking and throwing out fallacy after fallacy ever since.

You were wrong. Just accept your being wrong.

[TSA]

there are ways to influence an election without vote tallying being compromised

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg

[spurraider21]

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg

i dont think you've ever seen a post from me that said "hillary lost the election because russia"

there isn't really a way to quantify the impact. all the IC reports, as i recall, said they werent trying to quantify the impact. i still think its relevant enough that a foreign power sought to influence the outcome of our election

[ChumpDumper]

good thing there were crickets added or I might have voted for Bloomberg

not even what he said.

That tweet is a great example of misinformation.

[Ball Buster]

What are you saying happened?

Just accept your being wrong.

Ah, you can't explain in your own words what the impact of the Russians were on the election.

Ok.

[ChumpDumper]

i dont think you've ever seen a post from me that said "hillary lost the election because russia"

there isn't really a way to quantify the impact. all the IC reports, as i recall, said they werent trying to quantify the impact. i still think its relevant enough that a foreign power sought to influence the outcome of our election

As long as they think it will benefit Dennison, they will defend foreign interference to the death.

[ChumpDumper]

Ah, you can't explain in your own words what the impact of the Russians were on the election.

Ok.

I can't quantify it, but I do believe the email leaks had a significant influence on the election.

Can you say you were completely wrong about your NSA claim?

[Ball Buster]

I can't quantify it, but I do believe the email leaks had a significant influence on the election.

Can you say you were completely wrong about your NSA claim?

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.

[koriwhat]

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.

welp, he "believes" and that's all there is to it. like always Dumpster is a pathetic got!

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not wrong. I claimed the NSA never pursued any action against the Russians because they never had any evidence of foreign interference.

what "action" would they have "pursued" otherwise?

And I just posted their evidence. Again, I have to ask if you're deliberately trying to look stupid.