If the DOJ so desires, it can refuse to answer questions at the hearing. If the DOJ doesn't like the ruling, it can appeal.
That's the usual order of battle, right, TSA?
What's problem with Sullivan merely having a hearing?
That's a reason for withholding information from the press, not a judge.
If the DOJ so desires, it can refuse to answer questions at the hearing. If the DOJ doesn't like the ruling, it can appeal.
That's the usual order of battle, right, TSA?
What's problem with Sullivan merely having a hearing?
comrade TSA is a Bannon anarchist acolyte: flooding the zone with
Other than the fact Sullivan is making a circus of this and all about him now I don't have a problem with him merely having a hearing. The case is getting dismissed one way or another.
I don't think the Court is going to like this legal standard... but we'll see...
You've flooded the zone with so much that half the posters here have you on ignore. I don't think I'm on a single ignore list.
Wow. Dem backflips for Trump.
if so, this is a tempest in a teapot which raises the question, why is DOJ fighting Sullivan if he's going to grant the dismissal anyway?
its an absurd position that basically tries to read "leave of court" out of the code
i mean, the code could have said that a unilateral motion to dismiss would be subject to leave of court, but if done by stipulation of the parties must be granted... but that's not what the code says
Attribute source (Jerry Russel) at https://postflaviana.org/community/i...r.1548/page-47
That's one of TSA's bad habits, but he used to be much worse.
lol shut the up. That’s not even the source, this is the source. https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/0...ssia.html#more
And I’ve linked the source plenty of times when I’ve posted that before.
You asked 4 times on 1 page...begging.
I skipped your question because it has nothing to do with illegally conspiring with Russia and it’s a pathetic attempt to deflect.
You’re in a thread about “Russiagate”, why don’t you want to talk anymore about recent revelations of the FBI lying to not only the FISA court but now congress as well?
Yeah, after we reminded it it looked like you were posting other's takes as it they were your own.
Used to be your MOD not to give credit, you've improved a lot!
lol grudgeposting
You are mistaking me for Chris.
Not at all, just an unanswered recent question in a thread you are currently participating in.
‘Was I unmasked?’:
Trump appears to admit speaking with foreigners being monitored when he was a candidate
President Donald Trump wants to know how many times he was “unmasked” while he was a candidate for the Oval Office
he appears to know now he was talking to foreign individuals who were being monitored – and some would likely want to know who and why.
“we’re talking about unmasking, yes.
That was a big deal.
Horrible deal where they unmasked {Flynn] so many times.”
we’re still looking how many times did they unmask me.
Let’s find that out, too, because look, they were spying on our campaign.
They were using him and others, and
they were spying on my campaign. So was I unmasked?”
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/08/was..._campaign=5179
Thank you for using that term instead of "begs the question". It drives me nuts to see "begs the question" used improperly as it is so much these days even by MSM.
IMO, at this point, Sullivan will probably have his hearing and dismiss the case... the only actual question is if he'll do so without prejudice. That would open the door for re-opening the investigation after an administration change, and do away with double-jeopardy.
Good point.
Maybe that's why the DOJ wants to force Sullivan's hand with no hearing.
lol grudgenoring
You’re in a thread about “Russiagate”, why don’t you want to talk anymore about recent revelations of the FBI lying to not only the FISA court but now congress as well?
"First we Flynn. Then we Trump."
"Insurance policy"
All your perfervid accusations against Trump's enemies haven't come to very much so far, we'll see what the future holds when it arrives -- guys like you and Spurs Homer discuss conspiracies as if they were already proven.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)