Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 46
  1. #1
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    If LMA injury is significant and he'd miss possibly the year..

    If I'm Pop I start Bertans...

    I doubt this happens tho.. Bertans/Dedmond would equal FOUL CITY..

    I just wouldn't want to screw with the production I've been getting with Pau/Lee lately


    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    31,032
    Would rather start Anderson (you know, 'cause me). He would help facilitated the offense better and is a much better defender. However, when Bertans is hot, he makes this decision much harder. With Parker out, I go Anderson, but if Tony can get healthy and play well, then maybe Bertans' spacing makes more sense.

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    Would rather start Anderson (you know, 'cause me). He would help facilitated the offense better and is a much better defender. However, when Bertans is hot, he makes this decision much harder. With Parker out, I go Anderson, but if Tony can get healthy and play well, then maybe Bertans' spacing makes more sense.
    I would not want to play Bertans to hard in his first NBA season. His knees just might not hold up!

    We already know what Bertans can do. I worry that too much exposure gets him exposed and the league will shut him down just like they did Simmons.

    I would like to see more mileage with Forbes.

  4. #4
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    Would rather start Anderson (you know, 'cause me). He would help facilitated the offense better and is a much better defender. However, when Bertans is hot, he makes this decision much harder. With Parker out, I go Anderson, but if Tony can get healthy and play well, then maybe Bertans' spacing makes more sense.
    I would not want to play Bertans to hard in his first NBA season. His knees just might not hold up!

    We already know what Bertans can do. I worry that too much exposure gets him exposed and the league will shut him down just like they did Simmons.

    Simmons problem is that he's run out of tricks in his bag.

    I would like to see more mileage with Forbes.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    Would rather start Anderson (you know, 'cause me). He would help facilitated the offense better and is a much better defender. However, when Bertans is hot, he makes this decision much harder. With Parker out, I go Anderson, but if Tony can get healthy and play well, then maybe Bertans' spacing makes more sense.

    Yeah I see your point..but I assumed that Parker would be healthy which I guess would be asking too much?? But if he is healthy like you said it would open up space for him to rejuvenate himself lol

  6. #6
    TRU 'cross mah stomach LaMarcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    5,724
    Problem with another jump shooter is more standing around perimeter, with no people creating inside.

  7. #7
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,818
    I would not want to play Bertans to hard in his first NBA season. His knees just might not hold up!

    We already know what Bertans can do. I worry that too much exposure gets him exposed and the league will shut him down just like they did Simmons.

    I would like to see more mileage with Forbes.
    Simmons is an athletic guard who can't and won't shoot 3's, it's pretty much the rim or bust for him.

    Bertans is a 6'10 forward with deep range from 3, shutting him down mean you have another player attached to his hip 23-25 feet away from the rim. If he's playing with Green; that's two players that opposing teams can't sag off, 3 if Leonard's on the floor too. That's a lot of space for the Spurs to operate in, not to bring up Bonner but it was the primary reason why the offense was usually always great with him on the floor.

    He seems to be able to attack closeouts, which is also useful but it's almost impossible for teams to consistently shut down a shooter, without opening up something for a offense to exploit.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    Simmons is an athletic guard who can't and won't shoot 3's, it's pretty much the rim or bust for him.

    Bertans is a 6'10 forward with deep range from 3, shutting him down mean you have another player attached to his hip 23-25 feet away from the rim. If he's playing with Green; that's two players that opposing teams can't sag off, 3 if Leonard's on the floor too. That's a lot of space for the Spurs to operate in, not to bring up Bonner but it was the primary reason why the offense was usually always great with him on the floor.

    He seems to be able to attack closeouts, which is also useful but it's almost impossible for teams to consistently shut down a shooter, without opening up something for a offense to exploit.

    If only Bertans was somewhat the defensive player that Bonner was...he's got the length and atheisticism just not feel the yet

  9. #9
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,818
    Problem with another jump shooter is more standing around perimeter, with no people creating inside.
    Agreed. Lee is or Anderson is the best options. Lee as a P & R option and the occasional post up option or Anderson as a secondary play maker (making the extra pass that leads to an open shot) or driving,

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    7,288
    Simmons is an athletic guard who can't and won't shoot 3's, it's pretty much the rim or bust for him.

    Bertans is a 6'10 forward with deep range from 3, shutting him down mean you have another player attached to his hip 23-25 feet away from the rim. If he's playing with Green; that's two players that opposing teams can't sag off, 3 if Leonard's on the floor too. That's a lot of space for the Spurs to operate in, not to bring up Bonner but it was the primary reason why the offense was usually always great with him on the floor.

    He seems to be able to attack closeouts, which is also useful but it's almost impossible for teams to consistently shut down a shooter, without opening up something for a offense to exploit.
    I was thinking more about playing in the regular season.

    Sure, Bertans should play and play a lot in the post-season. He can spread the floor for Kawhi to operate.

  11. #11
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    Nor does he rebound well (Bertans). It's really the only worry for him starting. I think Pop stays with Ded-Lee and go from there.

    anderson deserves to play though. I don't know what spot or whatever but he's playing too well to not take advantage of.

  12. #12
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Fathead has a decent game against Matt Barnes and Ian Clark, and now he's "playing too well"

    Post 2014 fans smh

  13. #13
    Big Body look_at_g_shred's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    7,319
    Problem with another jump shooter is more standing around perimeter, with no people creating inside.
    Yup. We'd be no better than GS in the rebound department.

  14. #14
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    I don't like the idea of starting Bertans, tbh..his defense is poor and he's still too raw in the scheme IMO..Dedmon is still raw and inconsistent in that setting, I don't like the idea of having both out there together vs. opposing starting lineups..

    I like him in his current role as a spark plug type that can completely change the flow of the game with his shooting and energy..if he's playing well, I don't mind closing with him..

  15. #15
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Spurs can't afford to have 4 non-shooters on the floor.... Parker, Green, Fathead, Deadmon

    Gross tbh..

  16. #16
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    I don't like the idea of starting Bertans, tbh..his defense is poor and he's still too raw in the scheme IMO..Dedmon is still raw and inconsistent in that setting, I don't like the idea of having both out there together vs. opposing starting lineups..

    I like him in his current role as a spark plug type that can completely change the flow of the game with his shooting and energy..if he's playing well, I don't mind closing with him..

    Ok so what route do you go? I agree with his flaws tho on why you wouldn't.

  17. #17
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    Spurs can't afford to have 4 non-shooters on the floor.... Parker, Green, Fathead, Deadmon

    Gross tbh..

    This.

  18. #18
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    25,597
    No, he's not even ready enough to be a rotation player yet.

  19. #19
    MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Post Count
    21,348
    I don't like the idea of starting Bertans, tbh..his defense is poor and he's still too raw in the scheme IMO..Dedmon is still raw and inconsistent in that setting, I don't like the idea of having both out there together vs. opposing starting lineups..

    I like him in his current role as a spark plug type that can completely change the flow of the game with his shooting and energy..if he's playing well, I don't mind closing with him..
    Your gonna have minutes. I dread fathead starting. I think that's a really really bad combination.

  20. #20
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Ok so what route do you go? I agree with his flaws tho on why you wouldn't.
    No idea, yet..it's a time to experiment and play matchup-based rotations IMO..

    It's not an ideal time to experiment, since you generally want a solid rotation by March, but Spurs are in a bad position with the Aldridge situation, obviously..

  21. #21
    Veteran NASpurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,700
    Maybe if 2013 Parker was on the team.

  22. #22
    WIS peacemaker885's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,158
    I vote for Kyle over Davis for now.

  23. #23
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    I'd start Anderson in tonight's matchup, since it's going to be a defensive, grind-out game..Atlanta is an elite defensive team, but horrible on offense, their starting unit can't score enough to take advantage of the offensive flaws of the Spurs' starters..playing defense and allowing Kawhi to have a 40% usage rate(even coming off a missed game) is fine for tonight IMO..

    The Hawks generally start really slow, offensively, even worse than what we've seen from the Spurs the past few weeks..Hardaway and Ilyasova are their dangerous volume scorer/shooters and they come off the bench..

  24. #24
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    13,919
    Bertans is too physically weak to start. Until/unless he becomes physically strong enough to not get easily put under the rim by fellow stretch bigs, his minutes need to be match-up based.

    Anderson starting against the Hawks is a bad idea. Even though Millsap is more of a face up big, he could easily overpower him on the block, force help and generate open threes. They don't need to help a poor offense get off and gain confidence.

    I understand Pop doesn't want to go back to Gasol starting while Aldridge is out because he doesn't want him thinking that if the team, him or both are functioning well, it'll stay that way when Aldridge returns, but he really should be, especially with a match-up like the Hawks. In non Howard minutes, they play a Millsap-Ilyasova front line, neither of which Gasol should be matched up against.

  25. #25
    Veteran 8FOR!3's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    4,170
    David Lee starting makes the most sense. He's used to playing with Dedmon and plus playing with Gasol can probably make Kyle/Bertans look pretty good at the 4 off the bench. I guess you could start Kyle against some teams, but definitely not tonight. Millsap is too big and strong.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •