I say top 20 at least. If so, pull the chord.
If not, it. Don't start him next year and persuade him/alienate him to opt out the next offeason
I'd settle for "future considerations" or a player to be named later.
I say top 20 at least. If so, pull the chord.
If not, it. Don't start him next year and persuade him/alienate him to opt out the next offeason
Kings wanted Tony Parker included...deal is off
crofl if they can turn LMA into porzingod
80% chance all this is just hearsay bull and the Spurs bring back the exact same team next year tbh. And draft a Euro-stash
Pop and RC fleecing Phil Jackson.
With LA becoming a role player before our eyes, trading him isn't blowing it up imo.
No matter the beef, SA got to the WCF.
And they can get there again w/out him tbh..
This isn't surprising to me because of how the WCF unfolded and was an eye opener to PATFO for 2 reasons:
1. Spurs roster was too reliant on Kawhi.
2. LA is not a "take over the game" type player (can't have a 5 and 6 point game...).
Yes, they are...but not with LMA, they want Millsap...I wouldn't blame them for that.
For the right price, I'd pick Millsap over LMA, too.
Somehow, RC Buford's always the last to know.
I wonder which top 10 prospect is being targeted by RC in this draft?
Man this is more exciting than the finals
I can see interest from the Knicks or Phoenix but few other teams. I'd be surprised to see him moved, however. I did think Green will be traded.
I had been waiting for this since the first round of the playoffs
I'd like to see LMA gone. I simply don't enjoy watching him play. Not really a Spur type of guy.
Oh please oh please.
This.
A scoring threat-guard? A penetrating guard or a shooter? Or a playmaker?
Rebuilding team doesn't trade for a plus 30 year old "star."
Did you see it written on restroom wall or ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)