Bro, you can barely string coherent thoughts together let alone hit that level.
Do you enjoy being The Forum Rag?
Bro, you can barely string coherent thoughts together let alone hit that level.
Is that a yes?
DMC, not only has your Expert sock posted in threads you've started, you've even quoted and replied to each other. You don't have a leg to stand on
*Ding*
Hillary Clinton is an insanely rich person who grew up in Arkansas. She's probably been racist at some point in her life.
What does she have to do with whether or not Donald Trump is a white supremacist?
Hey dumbass there was no case to be made. He was a good QB up to that point. I already showed you the ing numbers to prove it.
Hillary was 27 when she moved to Arkansas. She grew up in Chicago.
You only know it's me because I told you. I also told you I was posting from another device. For a lawyer, you're not very bright.
So you really did spend time trying to sherlock a punch of alts.
Good god that's pathetic
More Chumpdumper pattern posting:
Create narrative
Comment on created narrative as if it's a fact
or
Ask leading question with false narrative insinuated as fact
Middle School Chump
I'll put aside your stereotype that a Southerner is likely to be racist (particularly since she grew up in Chicago). Hillary has screwed over more blacks than any other white person in modern history.
I never argued a correlation. I'm showing the blatant level of sanctimony in your stance.
You made a very convenient case based on anecdotal numbers. I let it go b/c I already had repeatedly said I thought Rush's argument was misguided. But since you want to be an asshole about it, let's look at the numbers up to 2003 when Rush made the argument....
QB Ratings
1999 - DM 60.8; Warner 109.2; Differential 48.4
2000 - DM 77.8; Griese 102.9; Differential 25.1
2001 - DM 84.3; Warner 101.4; Differential 17.1
2002 - DM 86.0; Pennington 104.2; Differential 18.2
2003 - DM 79.6; McNair 100.4; Differential 20.8
Congrats on the knowing-more-about-Hillary's-life own.
The entire Hillary conversation is tangential.
Well, the "tangential" conversation exposes the sanctimony that you bring to the table.
My stance is that Jemele Hill is justified in calling Donald Trump a white supremacist. I gave you 5 or 6 examples that support this stance, and you haven't addressed a single one.
Instead you brought up Hillary Clinton because you don't want to discuss the merits of the accusation against Trump. This is how stupid people argue.
LOL raving mad over a comment like that. Trigga trigga.
By alluding to your sanctimony, I meant Trump haters / Clinton supporters by extension. Don't worry, Jemele is likely no less sanctimonious than you are; probably more so, being an en led black woman.
He brings up semen shielding and you literally celebrate the shooting. Did you find courage over these last couple days to take stock in your sexuality?
I still don't get your question. Maybe expound a bit on which part you're asking "why" about. It's not rocket science.
Matter-of-fact statements that show ignorance need to be called out, especially with pricks like you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)