It's trendy
You brought her up the second you had to discuss Trump, who is the actual topic.
whatabout hillary
It's trendy
Because you were crying about Trump being a white supremacist when Hillary is the biggest white supremacist in the world. You're fine with demonizing the opposition til you have to face your own demons.
But we weren't talking about Hillary.
Richard Spencer is probably a bigger white supremacist than Donald Trump. We weren't talking about him either. So it would be stupid to be like but whatabout Richard Spencer?
See what I'm saying?
It's relevant, bro. If Hillary was in office, no ESPN reporter would be allowed to be calling Hillary a white supremacist. Also, it just highlights yours and millions levels of blatant self righteousness that you think you can call out Trump when Hillary (the presidential candidate that you supported) is the biggest white supremacist in the world.
You know it, and I know it. It's why you shut down like a little when I hit you with that right hook.
You are certainly committed to the bit.
"Biggest white supremacist in the world"
That's not a bit, bro. The Clinton machine has ed over blacks the world over. Do you pretend Hillary is not a racist?
At the very least, Hill should have been suspended.
But anyone who thinks their politics is the biggest reason for their rating drops should lose their posting privileges and be caged in a zoo with other apes.
There was nothing valid about Rush's comment on McNabb. It was a pretty poor opinion in general. The liberal media wasn't propping up McNabb just because he was black. He happened to be a very good QB.
Statistically, he was sh** or akin to it for the first five seasons. Rush called him out in the fifth season. He happened to be a "very good QB" after the fact; and not by the time he was signed by Vikings btw; he was f*cking cancer by then.
SMH. McNabb started out playing in an era from 2000-2003 before the rule changes benefitted the passing game. In 2001, he was 7th in passer rating right behind Brady, in 2002, he was 7th right behind Peyton. Plus he made a ton of plays with his feet and won a lot of games for the Eagles up to that point. So Rush was full of at the time.
I disagreed with Rush at the time. I even said that his comments reflected poorly on ESPN. But bringing it back to the point of relevance, what Rush said still has more credence than Jemele Hill outright smearing the president of the United States.
Not really. They're both dumb reckless statements based on race.
The media had a dog in the race; and there was a case for DM's race-based privilege. It was just stupid to go there; and it was stupid to speak of it in a definitive tone in the second place. What Jemele did was akin to slander of the POTUS, which is worse.
Adam Lambert
Keep your spankwire fixes to yourself.
slander. Trump is free to sue if he's as upset as you are.
"or akin to it."
If ESPN wants to have their "personalities" make these vitriolic attacks, they can enjoy losing more subscribers, though.
Did you unsubscribe from ESPN?
Nope. I suppose you think that proves something?
Nothing we didn't already know.
LOL, the semen shielding, surface-thinking closet case dealing out the accusations...wrongfully...LOL, he definitely sticks to his simple LOLeftist rhetoric of "we can, they can't". Simple, sad .
What do you think it shows? That you can make assumptions with incomplete data? I would think so given your willingness to drop the subject so quickly.
You can't drop a subject that was never the subject in the first place.
Go ahead, hit me again with a Hillary or Adam Lambert white flag.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)