Calm Before the Storm---Book of Q

[TSA]

[TSA]

[Chucho]

What do these resignations mean?

[dabom]

What do these resignations mean?

I don't know. Maybe TSA can help.

[dabom]

And wtf is the hill?

[ElNono]

Trumps EO and new Magintsky sanction targets were a massive shot across the cabal’s bow.

Say what? Whats this conspiracy about?

[Reck]

Say what? Whats this conspiracy about?

TSA's brand new conspiracy.

You’re right. It’s almost 2018 time for a new catch phrase.

#BOOMYGOD

[ElNono]

That looks like a pretty clear cut EO. What’s the conspiracy?

[Reck]

That looks like a pretty clear cut EO. What’s the conspiracy?

Apparently the new angle is that Obama and Hillary are involved somehow in these human rights abuse and he has acted on it. Will catch them soon.

[Pavlov]

Trump and co working behind the scenes to take down the corrupt politicians and elite. Latest Magintsky sanctions put the Clintons in the crosshairs.

So you're saying Clinton is going to go before a military tribunal?

Yes or no.

[ElNono]

Apparently the new angle is that Obama and Hillary are involved somehow in these human rights abuse and he has acted on it. Will catch them soon.

Not sure how that EO helps with that, but ok

[Pavlov]

Not sure how that EO helps with that, but ok

Because prosecuting Obama is a national emergency.

[Spurminator]

I don’t care what you’re calling me. You’re afraid to acknowledge what is happening. You’re afraid to acknowledge you’ve been blind this whole time.

I'm not at all. Let me know when anyone gets charged and I will celebrate justice just like other normal people who don't spend half of the day getting excited over 4chan speculation.

Just stop pretending you're anti corruption and anti elitist while you fanboy for Donald J. Trump and spread clickbait from liars and other terrible people. It's sad.

[Spurminator]

It's much more dignified to just say "I prefer my side's elitism and corruption more than the other side's."

[TSA]

So you're saying Clinton is going to go before a military tribunal?

Yes or no.

Don't know.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

[TSA]

Not sure how that EO helps with that, but ok

You've been here long enough to know Reck is too dumb to take seriously. Not once did I mention Obama and Hillary being involved in human rights abuses.

Here is where the EO and the Clintons come in to play.

Section 1

(B)"to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly engaged in:
(1)corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2)the transfer or facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption


Now take note of the names the Treasury department sanctioned

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0243

Now take note of how many of the names being sanctioned are connected directly to the Clintons

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/9...702041088.html

[Pavlov]

Don't know.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

Directly?

No.

But thanks for predicting the Clintons will be arrested and put before a military tribunal.

[TSA]

Directly?

No.

But thanks for predicting the Clintons will be arrested and put before a military tribunal.

I didn't ask if directly connected. Try again.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

[Chris]

I didn't ask if directly connected. Try again.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

I guess that one didn't compute, he logged off.

[Splits]

I didn't ask if directly connected. Try again.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

How many degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon?

[Splits]

You've been here long enough to know Reck is too dumb to take seriously. Not once did I mention Obama and Hillary being involved in human rights abuses.

Here is where the EO and the Clintons come in to play.

Section 1

(B)"to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly engaged in:
(1)corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2)the transfer or facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption


Now take note of the names the Treasury department sanctioned

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0243

Now take note of how many of the names being sanctioned are connected directly to the Clintons

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/9...702041088.html

I love that last leap of faith

[Pavlov]

I didn't ask if directly connected. Try again.

Sorry, your source did.

Are you disagreeing with your source?

Yes or no.

[TSA]

Sorry, your source did.

Are you disagreeing with your source?

Yes or no.

Source said both direct and indirect, stop stalling.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

[Pavlov]

Source said both direct and indirect, stop stalling.

Were the majority of the people named in the sanctions connected to Clintons yes or no?

Many with gossamer threads, sure.

It's not difficult to link someone of note with the Clintons. Trump is linked with the Clintons.

DIRECTLY!

[ElNono]

You've been here long enough to know Reck is too dumb to take seriously. Not once did I mention Obama and Hillary being involved in human rights abuses.

Here is where the EO and the Clintons come in to play.

Section 1

(B)"to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly engaged in:
(1)corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2)the transfer or facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption


Now take note of the names the Treasury department sanctioned

https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/sm0243

Now take note of how many of the names being sanctioned are connected directly to the Clintons

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/9...702041088.html

If the Clintons would be targeted, they’ll be on the list. Notice the EO gives permission merely to forfeit property/assets at the Treasury discretion, not engage in any kind of judicial role (which the executive can’t do anyways, basic separation of powers).

This EO is more akin to the ones used against drug dealers, etc to freeze their assets whenever they use the American banking system. It’s actually debatable the order is cons utionally sound, but I guess we’ll find out soon enough.