Reply With Quote
Democrats can have DACA any time they want it.
".... But the Supreme Court’s rejection is actually a win for the Trump administration politically, too. That’s because the Trump administration will not have to start deporting DREAMers — so no nasty headlines about Trump cruelty. And meanwhile, the Trump administration will be able to claim to its supporters that it did everything in its power to stop DACA, but was thwarted by leftist courts....."
So basically it's a win because he'll lie.
Just another day in this administration.
Democrats can have DACA any time they want it.
Just like that?
No strings?
Explain.
Of course there are conpromises available to give those poor kids citizenship.
Pelosi and Schumer only want votes. They don't give a about those kids.
So there are strings?
They can't just get it whenever they want?
OK.
Sure, they could get it right now if they wanted it. They would rather use it as a wedge effort forever than compromise.
CC wants det wall built.
I think a wall is only appropriate in urban areas but I do believe in controlling our borders. That is a basic responsibility of the federal government.
Trash killed DACA to force Dems to pay for his ing wall and obliteration of legal immigration.
Clean DACA, or shut down the govt. Call Trash's bull ty bluff
CC believes in compromise in government now.
I always have. You act like its a bad thing.
Of course.
Do you think that the current legal immigration system where a high percentage of immigrants are still on welfare after > 21 years is a long-term sustainable policy? If 48% of them are still on welfare after more than 21 years, and a good percentage of the rest are struggling (but not on welfare) like most Americans, please explain how many are left who are a benefit to the US. Of course, you might think that legal immigration should not be a benefit to the US - that we should just let everyone in - then please explain what the US would be like if that happens.
Figure 6. Welfare use is high for both new arrivals and well-established immigrants.
< 5 years - 50%
5-10 years - 51%
11-15 years - 54%
16-21 years - 56%
> 21 years - 48%
Natives - 30%
https://cis.org/Report/Welfare-Use-I...ive-Households
"Several reports published by the CIS have been disputed by scholars on immigration;
a wide range of think tanks;
fact-checkers such as PolitiFact, FactCheck.Org, Washington Post, Snopes, CNN and NBC News; and
by immigration-research organizations.
Critics have accused the CIS of
extremist nativist views and for ties to white supremacy groups
, which the CIS rejects"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cent...ration_Studies
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-27-2018 at 05:33 PM.
SUPREME COURT RULES IMMIGRANTS CAN BE DETAINED INDEFINITELY WITHOUT BOND HEARINGS
http://www.newsweek.com/supreme-cour...initely-822613
huge boost for private prisons, detention centers, that will reap $Bs from taxpayers, and continue rape, abuse, ignore their medical, menstrual needs.
America getting uglier, nastier, more inhumane by the day under the rule of the oligarchy.
tee hee
That's funny.
should've just marched south past the border instead.
lmfao at the en led thinking of these illegal immigrants.
“I walked 250 miles to the Capitol and passed through many communities that opened their homes to us."
good for you. those people were harboring illegals illegally.
"And yet now that we are here, Congress has closed their door,”
as should be. you're not a citizen and don't have any rights here whatsoever. congress did the right thing.
“The undo ented community cannot wait for Congress to catch up to our lives!”
good. ask your own congress in your own country of origin to help yall instead. take your en led asses back to your holes!
Trump's 12 year plan for 1.8 million Dreamers was more than fair. Chuck and Nancy will obstruct anything Trump does because they were so close to getting Hillary in and starting WW3. This is what they really want, they could care less Dreamers.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
