North Korea says it may give up nukes, willing to talk.

[Pavlov]

I made a deal with him, I shook hands with him, I really believe he means it. Now, is it possible? Have I been in deals, have you been in things where, people didn't work out? It’s possible.

[SnakeBoy]

He’s your leader, and he’s doing the same dog job with NK as all other Presidents, yet trying to take credit for negotiating peace. You don’t have a problem with that?

Non-answer deflection and/or DarrinS approved jokey jokes incoming.

That's a non-answer deflection

[Chris]

That's a non-answer deflection

Poor fella

[monosylab1k]

That's a non-answer deflection

You didn’t ask me.

btw 2 for 1, gets the Darrin stamp of approval. Such a good understudy.

[Blake]

What would you like him to do to NK?

Where did I say I want him to do anything to NK?

What i would like is for the idiot to not bluster bluff when we can all see his hand

[Chris]

^ has no idea what is going on

[Blake]

^ pretends like he does

[Chris]

^ can't answer a question without calling Trump a dumby dumb-dumb. Fully programmed and easily triggered.

[Blake]

muh trump isn't dum you're dum

[RandomGuy]

North Korea making 'rapid' upgrades to nuclear reactor despite summit pledges

Monitoring group says work shows why a denuclearisation deal rather than a ‘statement of lofty goals’ is needed

North Korea has continued to upgrade its only known nuclear reactor used to fuel its weapons program, satellite imagery has shown, despite ongoing negotiations with the US and a pledge to denuclearise.

Infrastructure improvements at the Yongbyon nuclear plant are “continuing at a rapid pace”, according to an analysis by monitoring group 38 North of commercial satellite images taken on 21 June.

The cooling system for the plutonium production reactor has been modified and

at least two new non-industrial buildings have been built on the site, possibly for use by visiting officials.

A new engineering office building has been completed and construction has continued on support facilities throughout the complex

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/27/north-korea-nuclear-reactor-upgrades-summit-pledges

Kim playing Trash, just like Trash played all y'all less Trash fellators.

Shocker.

[RandomGuy]

Meh. Fat boy isnt giving up his nukes. They have done the "lets talk" many times before just to stall and ed us every time.

... and Trump fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

What does it say about your party, that their preference for leadership is a rube? That people like Chris fell for it, and aped the propaganda about it?

[RandomGuy]

smh

"Kim is not inviting Trump so he can surrender North Korea's weapons. Kim is inviting Trump to demonstrate that his investment in nuclear and missle capabilities has forced the United States to treat him as an equal." -Jeffrey Lewis

NK has asked for these meetings for decades. Every US president has been too smart to fall for it. Until now. Incredible.

And thats worked so well, too. We are so glad NK doesn't have nukes now.

So now they are doing what they wanted to anyway AND were handed a propaganda winfall.

[RandomGuy]

Never before has a presidential candidate been this much of a whiny sore loser for this long. Desperately trying to stay relevant and because that she is still in the news. Making fun of someone that complains that hard and for that long should in no way be mistaken for caring. You honestly think anyone here is googling up Hillary trying to find out how she's been doing?

I think most of the ones who keep bringing her up are regularly supplied with updates on her by the news and social media sources the plug their minds into so they don't have to think.

Pretty much. She was so disliked that giving up that kind of hatred to mainline would be like asking Crackhead bob to stop smoking the white stuff.

[RandomGuy]

These es are going to have complete mental breakdowns if Trump gets this deal done.

These es are going to laugh at you and your clueless puppy when it blows up in their face, like everyone said it would.

[pgardn]

What would you like him to do to NK?

Go to them AGAIN for a meeting with an agenda for denuclearization. A initial plan should already be been done. So he needs to try again. Practice. They need to practice until they get it right. Not forget about it like Trump University and Trump Steaks.

[florige]

These es are going to laugh at you and your clueless puppy when it blows up in their face, like everyone said it would.

I'm sure the rest of the world leaders view Trump as a arrogant, loud mouth, idiot who likes to run off at the mouth and does things without consulting anyone. So leaders like Putin and Kim use it as a political play that they can use to their advantage. GW was a idiot no doubt, but at least he was smart enough to let Cheaney run things and he just pretty much stayed out the way.

[sickdsm]

... and Trump fell for it, hook, line and sinker.

What does it say about your party, that their preference for leadership is a rube? That people like Chris fell for it, and aped the propaganda about it?

The republican party's preference for leadership was never Trump. The elites and swamp dwellers fought him tooth and nail until after he was elected. They then had no choice but to support him. The difference between THAT and the DFL was the Democrats rigged the primaries when there choice , Clinton, was struggling against the people's choice, Bernie. The idiots that supported Clinton after that move instead of demanding Justice are the reason Trump had the le President in front of his name.


Check your liberal bias.

[RandomGuy]

The republican party's preference for leadership was never Trump. The elites and swamp dwellers fought him tooth and nail until after he was elected. They then had no choice but to support him. The difference between THAT and the DFL was the Democrats rigged the primaries when there choice , Clinton, was struggling against the people's choice, Bernie. The idiots that supported Clinton after that move instead of demanding Justice are the reason Trump had the le President in front of his name.


Check your liberal bias.

I must have missed the part where a party will nominate someone it doesn't prefer for president.

Who was the Republican party nominee in 2016?

[RandomGuy]

I'm sure the rest of the world leaders view Trump as a arrogant, loud mouth, idiot who likes to run off at the mouth and does things without consulting anyone. So leaders like Putin and Kim use it as a political play that they can use to their advantage. GW was a idiot no doubt, but at least he was smart enough to let Cheaney run things and he just pretty much stayed out the way.

Pretty much. The US economy will suffer some pretty irreversible long-term damage from Trump's presidency. The damage to the brand will have a long term depressing effect on demand for US goods/services, as is manifesting in Canada.

Not saying it will be a huge harm, but long term growth will be lower due to lower demand of US goods. China is offering a reasonable alternative, and many countries are happy for the choice.

[Chris]

I'm sure the rest of the world leaders view Trump as a arrogant, loud mouth, idiot who likes to run off at the mouth and does things without consulting anyone. So leaders like Putin and Kim use it as a political play that they can use to their advantage. GW was a idiot no doubt, but at least he was smart enough to let Cheaney run things and he just pretty much stayed out the way.

^ You can't fix stupid. Wow, I thought Blake held the crown until now.

[sickdsm]

I must have missed the part where a party will nominate someone it doesn't prefer for president.

Who was the Republican party nominee in 2016?

Lol. Say that first paragraph REEEEAAAALLLLL slow. All the while thinking about how Bernie was showed into falling in line. Say what you want about the Rep. primary but at least Trump was put on the ballot by his supporters.


Sanders lost by election fraud. Clinton was so detested that not only did she lose one of the biggest upsets in a presidential race, she couldn't even win the support during the primaries. She will forever have a bigger asterick next to her name than Barry Bonds, '99 Spurs, and Lance Armstrong combined.

[RandomGuy]

I must have missed the part where a party will nominate someone it doesn't prefer for president.

Who was the Republican party nominee in 2016?

Lol. Say that first paragraph REEEEAAAALLLLL slow. All the while thinking about how Bernie was showed into falling in line. Say what you want about the Rep. primary but at least Trump was put on the ballot by his supporters.

Sanders lost by election fraud. Clinton was so detested that not only did she lose one of the biggest upsets in a presidential race, she couldn't even win the support during the primaries. She will forever have a bigger asterick next to her name than Barry Bonds, '99 Spurs, and Lance Armstrong combined.

I thought is was such an easy question, and would have been for someone being intellectually honest.

Trump was the preferred person for the Republican party.

Sanders lost because more people voted for Clinton, by the tune of about 3M, but thanks for showing your bias. Way to suck up propaganda as fact.

[Blake]

Sanders lost by election fraud.

Smh ass talking

[boutons_deux]

Pompeo going to NK to find out WTF is going on

[Chris]