Except he said the 1st Amendment is a good thing.
lol Nathan missing every point ever made.
Why would it be a problem? The method of selecting an electoral winner doesn't involve changing the 1st amendment.
Except he said the 1st Amendment is a good thing.
lol Nathan missing every point ever made.
If you do, dont buy a house. The bubble is going to burst and it's going to be uglier than the last recession. Wait and scavenge, you'll be happy you did.
which part tbh?
What's crazy is that a rent is not that far off from a mortgage if you have the money for the 20%-25% down-payment.
San Mateo or Santa Monica.
Basically, house prices are in-line with house prices here in NJ, but rent is about 3x-4x as much, pretty wicked.
And he also said he would like to regulate fox news but he can't because of the 1st amendment. I realize he sent a mixed message.
He sent the right message. The rights granted by the Cons ution trump personal wishes, even if they're shared by a majority of the population.
It's an unequivocal message.
Not mixed at all.
He supports the 1st amendment.
Pretty clear.
How many of you are going to hole up in one vacant house tbh?
Wish our POTUS would send similar clear messages about respecting the law of the land when he talks about intervention on CNN, Twitter, Facebook, etc...
As many as Soros money allows, tbh...
If the wind changes just a bit he'll be fear mongering over free speech just like Dems currently do over the 2nd amendment. Dems blueprint Europe has absurd speech laws already. So yeah the 1st amendment is only thing stopping that extremism. Only a matter of time before high school students are being riled up to march out of class and media putting their "wisdom" front and center as they currently do with the 2nd amendment.
Are you drunk?
Don’t do it my Nig. I thought you was committed to NJ???
To his credit he recognizes that the 1st amendment prevents him from enacting his fascist wants which is a long term positive.
Been to Europe, have family in Europe, they certainly have a different history and the laws differ on a country by country basis. Generally there's nothing extreme about speech laws there, IMO, but certainly debatable.
I mean, even OUR Cons ution has means to be changed by a really high bar of consensus, so that's also not off the table. But what should really stand out about that message is that as long as the law exists, it has to be respected, and if you want to change it, then you need to take steps to do so while abiding by it.
It's a direct message about respect for the law above all else, which is the right message, IMO.
Altho my bro lives in Santa Monica. I’ll hook you up with the lesser VY. Him and SR21 can show you all the hot armo spots around town. Maybe get some kefte while you’re at it.
What does Bernie think about the 1st Amendment?
He just an idiot.
Well, I think I have to take serious offers seriously, do some due diligence on them, discuss with the family what's best for us going forward, analyze if it's time for some change of pace/scenery after 20 years.
I'm talking with all parties, looking at the info, and will take all that with me to the holiday recess and think about it. I'm in a good situation right now, but I also relish getting out of my comfort zone and try to grow, be better, whether it ends up working in the end or not.
If I was overly concerned about the ability for the government to regulate fox news while the 1st amendment exists then that would standout as a positive. I'm not though so his general message is very concerning to me.
Irrelevant. Go look it up.
Have you ever considered you're just not smart at all?
I grew up in Toms River and Edison. So help me god if you sell NJ out to move to SoCal ...
In all seriousness tho, you gotta do what’s best for you and your fam. Glad to hear you might be collecting more of dem checks ...
He's a left winger and presumably as fascist as you claim Democrats are.
Your support of him is really a sore spot with you.
Why?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)