Snopes Exposed as a CIA Operation

[ElNono]

Lol that bizarre stuff is awesome, have you seen the papers in Hitman Blood Money? National Enquirer material.

There's clearly an audience for that...

[Mikeanaro]

You don’t have a clue what to read.
Quit looking at stuff in the grocery store line.

BTW, Trump loves the National Enquirer.
He has used it for facts.
oh, he’s just trolling... whatever...

If you dont understand trolling you are free to have your opinions.

[Spurtacular]

lol @ the bolded, then you call me smug... smh

Point being, if you can't pinpoint what's wrong with them, how can I take you seriously? You don't like they out lies because they source them? Do they make up stories? I mean, what's you real beef with them? Provide a link if necessary...

It's no more smug than calling out any other organization for having an agenda. Quite the difference from equating media dissemination with math/science.

[Blake]

Still blaming God.

That'd be like blaming Santa

[ElNono]

It's no more smug than calling out any other organization for having an agenda. Quite the difference from equating media dissemination with math/science.

It's your claim... what are they, in your view? left, right? What makes them left or right?

I mean, it's not difficult to point at CNN or Fox and get a quick example of opinion-based bias...

[ElNono]

If you can't point me to a fact they presented as such that it's not, then what's the difference with a math/science fact? Do they do opinion?

Is it a case of "what I want to believe" type of thing?

[ElNono]

If Trump signs a law like the tax cuts and I get to learn that from the media, is that a sham, tbh?... how deep does the rabbit hole goes?

It's a fact he signed it, even though I didn't see it. Where's the agenda there?

[Mikeanaro]

If Trump signs a law like the tax cuts and I get to learn that from the media, is that a sham, tbh?... how deep does the rabbit hole goes?

It's a fact he signed it, even though I didn't see it. Where's the agenda there?

What the media does is
A) Pro Trump = you can save at least 1k in a year
B) Anti-Trump = just 1k? thats nothing

And you may form an opinion based on that, may be A or B or neutral.

[Spurtacular]

That'd be like blaming Santa

Yea, Santa isn't the one who cucked you either.

[Mikeanaro]

Yea, Santa isn't the one who cucked you either.

[ElNono]

What the media does is
A) Pro Trump = you can save at least 1k in a year
B) Anti-Trump = just 1k? thats nothing

And you may form an opinion based on that, may be A or B or neutral.

But the fact that the tax cuts were signed is a fact... that's not debatable... how anybody feels about it is inconsequential to the fact.

[ElNono]

I mean, if the prerogative is that certain media will react to certain facts with an opinion and a narrative, that's fine. It still doesn't invalidate the fact.

You just need to know how to separate opinion from non opinion.

That's basically what critical thinking is, tbh...

[Mikeanaro]

But the fact that the tax cuts were signed is a fact... that's not debatable... how anybody feels about it is inconsequential to the fact.

Try to explain that to liberals, ¨muh feelangs¨ over facts.

[Pavlov]

It's no more smug than calling out any other organization for having an agenda. Quite the difference from equating media dissemination with math/science.

Try to explain that to liberals, ¨muh feelangs¨ over facts.

How do you guys verify or refute a questionable claim you saw on the internet?

[ElNono]

Try to explain that to liberals, ¨muh feelangs¨ over facts.

plenty of snowflakes on both sides...

[Blake]

Yea, Santa isn't the one who cucked you either.

Although a person may experience a wide range of sexual obsessions, common themes involve those that may be considered forbidden, such as:

sexuality
Sexual abuse or violence
Sexual thoughts about friends
Incest
Infidelity
Sexual sadism or masochism
Sexual enslavement
Beastiality
Underage sex
Sex and religion as a form of blasphemy

The thoughts can occur with or without compulsions, and having such thoughts doesn't mean a person will act upon them.

It has been estimated that between six percent and 24 percent of people with OCD will experience some form of sexual obsession. The number may be even higher given that most people are reluctant to share such thoughts...

https://www.verywellmind.com/sexual-...in-ocd-2510558

Hope this helps

[Spurtacular]

https://www.verywellmind.com/sexual-...in-ocd-2510558

Hope this helps

Cuck trying to get clinical.

[Spurtacular]

But the fact that the tax cuts were signed is a fact... that's not debatable... how anybody feels about it is inconsequential to the fact.

I mean, if the prerogative is that certain media will react to certain facts with an opinion and a narrative, that's fine. It still doesn't invalidate the fact.

You just need to know how to separate opinion from non opinion.

That's basically what critical thinking is, tbh...

You've been very assumptive that snopes simply sticks to straight-laced facts and that they are on the level.

[Blake]

Cuck trying to get clinical.

You're clearly obsessed. Just trying to help.

[Spurtacular]

You're clearly obsessed. Just trying to help.

A cuck is the last person I'd go to for help.

[spurraider21]

You've been very assumptive that snopes simply sticks to straight-laced facts and that they are on the level.

I don't get the actual criticism of Snopes, tbh...

what's your take Spurtacular?

They disclose how they operate, how they make their money, etc:
https://www.snopes.com/about-snopes/

They source all their claims. You're free to agree to disagree with their takes, but you can't say they didn't source it.

What specific concern do you have, tbh? Or is this one of those 'I don't trust anything from anywhere' loon thingie?

I have no idea what you guys are talking about... I actually asked for specific concerns, but I've got none back...

It's not even a site I visit frequently or anything, but I do know they source everything they post... which is actually not what happens in social media, etc...

I've asked you about your concern, you listed none. You started by claiming the site was operated by a 50 year old couple, when you had no idea how that site operated at all.

At least if you want to have an honest take, do the legwork. There's nothing wrong with the uneducated because they didn't have the possibility to educate themselves. But being uneducated out of laziness gets no sympathy from me

Point being, if you can't pinpoint what's wrong with them, how can I take you seriously? You don't like they out lies because they source them? Do they make up stories? I mean, what's you real beef with them? Provide a link if necessary...

If you can't point me to a fact they presented as such that it's not, then...

brah derp never gets into specifics. Dude has whined about the Clinton’s cartel but has never articulated a single crime he thinks they committed

[Spurtacular]

brah derp never gets into specifics. Dude has whined about the Clinton’s cartel but has never articulated a single crime he thinks they committed

#StillWithHer
Pretending Hillary is clean.

[Blake]

A cuck is the last person I'd go to for help.

As long as you go for help.

[spurraider21]

Yeah just like that

[Spurtacular]

As long as you go for help.

Based on a cuck's evaluation? Pass.