Reply With Quote
You can't go 3 posts without talking passive aggressively about cucks. It doesn't take a Freud to see you've got issues.
If you're gonna be dumb enough to hitch your cart to Hillary....
You can't go 3 posts without talking passive aggressively about cucks. It doesn't take a Freud to see you've got issues.
Very assumptive
It doesn't take Freud to see that you want to go back to the days of your hero's 'Don't ask, don't tell.'
Oh shocking. Derp believes this stuff.
Oh shocking. Tranny believes in the infallibility of snopes.
Trumps conflicts of interest require a 600+ line spreadsheet to track.People already knew Hilda was , and even the ones who didnt like Trump voted for him.
Thats why Dems appealed to illegals to get votes no matter what when in fact they were against them.
They lost, Trump won and the Russian tale came in.
That was like 2 years ago, there are no economy/education/deals/navy/ecology interest everything is about Russia/Stormy.
Thats a fact, people prefers that.
92% chances was a fact? Fake news is a fact.
People´s choice.
I don't believe for a second that you give a about anything Hillary did.
https://sunlightfoundation.com/track...s-of-interest/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...#gid=397855752
yes those are the two choices. CIA operation or infallible
https://www.google.com/search?q=does...+with+chickensCaps Lock
I've never spoken of that issue here.
You can't go 3 posts without talking about cucks or trannies
You've been very lacking when asked to present specifics to the contrary...
I need more than "I'm smart and sized them up a while ago"... Not that I don't think you're smart or not, but "take my word for it" doesn't really work for me...
Quote me where I said it was a CIA operation.
I've never said I need to convince you. My point is you have blind faith in them. We'll see where that gets you.
That's how 'Don't ask, don't tell' works.
Today's cuck
AaronY "nother level"
A front for whom?
You don't know what blind faith is.
Add that to the list, along with "memes."
We already know you'd never call out snopes. I was talking to the non koolaid drinker.
You've consistently been quite lame.
I'm asking you for whom you claim Snopes is a front group.
I know what you're asking. But we know you're going to believe in them through and through, hence the koolaid drinker reference.
But for whom are you saying they are a front organization?
For an en y who is grateful that you're a willing pawn.
And which en y is that?
You're on a blue pill regimen, son. That ain't changing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
