Reply With Quote
rll
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-trump-w518587
Crazy. They are so far ahead of us when it comes to cyber warfare, misinformation, and propoganda.
r
"studies have shown" that racism/white iden y politics motivated Trash's base more than economics, which was second
and guess what the priority was for Pootin's cyber army?
Most Russian Facebook ads sought to divide Americans on race
According to a new analysis, most Russian-linked Facebook ads before and after the 2016 election were tied to race, crime, and policing.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ouse-democrats
Good read, thanks OP
Oh
http://time.com/5340362/mariia-butina-arrest-russia/
Donald even took a question from her.
“We don’t need sanctions.”
Until the Senate pushed his ass in.
We need better relations so they can fk with our elections.
That chick that nobody ever heard of until today, probably switched millions of votes.
Plenty of people heard about her before today.
Just not you, Darrin.
And Chris.
And derp.
usw....
No I don’t think she did.
She worked for the Russian government attempting to play with our far right wing nuts.
Thats enough Darrin. You go try that in Russia and see where you end up.
My god you are a fiercely loyal piece of , aren't you?
You're not required to pick a team and stick with it, Darrin. You can admit when looks bad. It wouldn't reflect as poorly on you as these takes do.
I didn’t vote in 2016 election.
Do you think I care? How is that relevant?
You're still a pathetic Trump loyalist who keeps digging himself into a deeper hole for, what, imaginary internet points? Have some dignity and conviction you ing pussy.
Let's look at a few supposed facts (I say supposed because I cannot independently verify them, I have to take someone's word for it)
1. Hillary's campaign railroaded Bernie Sanders
2. Hillary's campaign received the debate questions in advance
3. Hillary had 20 years to run for office, didn't really need to get around much.
4. Hillary had a projected 98.1% chance of winning
Do I think Trumps people colluded? Most likely. However you're being a bit sanctimonious here as a Hillary supporter to call someone out for toeing a party line. Also the virtue signaling is a bit too thick.
You had every... EVERY ing opportunity to claim the Whitehouse and you ing blew it. You've not faced that fact. You were outplayed by a ing orange reality TV guy who openly stated he would grab women by the pussy, months before the election, and ing won. This dude was roasted by the same people who roasted Charlie Sheen.
I mean, you cannot even invent this ed up. Goddamn the DNC is defunct.
Still, somehow to you it's the end of the world now. You see that brass impeachment ring and you're reaching for it...
keep reaching. What a show.
lol bury det lede, DMC
That post was not at all relevant to what I said, but at least you met your weekly "Hillary" quota.
I had one vote in 2016 and I cast it for Hillary Clinton. I'm not sure what you think I should have done personally to swing battleground states in her favor, but we're not talking about campaign strategy here, we're talking about an individual's blind loyalty to a disloyal President two years after he was elected.
All you idiots have to say is "Yeah, looks like there's some su ious coordination between Russian operatives and the NRA here, but I still preferred Trump in 2016," but you won't do it because you're so afraid that strangers you spend way too much time arguing online with might perceive this to be a "W."
The "I'm only one person" defense. A card often played after you accuse though repeated insinuation that the other side is geneous.That post was not at all relevant to what I said, but at least you met your weekly "Hillary" quota.
I had one vote in 2016 and I cast it for Hillary Clinton. I'm not sure what you think I should have done personally to swing battleground states in her favor, but we're not talking about campaign strategy here, we're talking about blind loyalty to a disloyal President two years after he was elected.
Weird DMC meltdown tbh.
You have a comment for everything. I'd bet your a ing blast to hang out with.
Side? genous? I accused Darrin (one person) of semen shielding for Donald Trump.
I bet you're a who can't take an actual stand in real life either.
Darrin says he didn't vote - You didn't care, he's a Trump loyalist who didn't vote.
You say you did vote - You claim to be only one person though with no power though you created a sock puppet to troll Trump supporters and prop up Hillary.
It's a common tactic to claim you aren't part of "them" when it looks bad for them, yet you consider the other side all the same, even those who didn't vote.
Yes, you're ing re ed.
This is the stupidest argument you have ever attempted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
