Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[Chris]

[Spurtacular]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_More_Law_Center

Blakehole

[Pavlov]

States' rights bad now.

[Chris]

[Winehole23]

Blakehole

Derp on TILT

[Pavlov]

Yeah, Jesus was a damn tycoon.

[Spurtacular]

States' rights bad now.

States have the right to harbor illegals?

Chump doesn't know how the Cons ution works.

[Pavlov]

States have the right to harbor illegals?

Chump doesn't know how the Cons ution works.

OK, show me how the Cons ution works in this case. Please cite the relevant clause and court cases.

Thanks in advance. I know you'll answer and not yourself.

[Spurtacular]

OK, show me how the Cons ution works in this case. Please cite the relevant clause and court cases.

Thanks in advance. I know you'll answer and not yourself.

So, are you saying that ICE is an uncons utional operation?

[koriwhat]

So, are you saying that ICE is an uncons utional operation?

so glad i stopped dealing with that ing ... you should try it yourself spurt and just ghost the loser from here on out. it's been a great 2 weeks on ST since...

[Pavlov]

So, are you saying that ICE is an uncons utional operation?

You're ting yourself.

Show me how the Cons ution works in this case. Please cite the relevant clause and court cases.

Your claim. Back it up or back down.

[Pavlov]

so glad i stopped dealing with that ing ... you should try it yourself spurt and just ghost the loser from here on out. it's been a great 2 weeks on ST since...

You're still raging at everyone. Take some drugs.

[koriwhat]

can't stop, won't stop...

[Pavlov]

can't stop, won't stop...

Nope, you can't stop your rage, nor can you stop responding.

It's so cute.

Now respond again.

[koriwhat]

[Spurtacular]

You're ting yourself.

Show me how the Cons ution works in this case. Please cite the relevant clause and court cases.

Your claim. Back it up or back down.

Your questions are based on ICE being uncons utional. Step up, or step down.

[Pavlov]

Your questions are based on ICE being uncons utional.

No, my question is based on your backing up your claim.

You've just yourself and completely failed to back up your claim.

Good talk.

Stay down.

lol derp

[Spurtacular]

No, my question is based on your backing up your claim.

You've just yourself and completely failed to back up your claim.

Good talk.

Stay down.

lol derp

So, you believe that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization?

Yes or no.

[Pavlov]

So, you believe that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization?

Yes or no.

Sure.

I never said it was uncons utional.

You changed the subject to the Cons ution.

Who said it was uncons utional?

Answer or fold.

[Spurtacular]

Sure.

Who said it was uncons utional?

Answer or fold.

If it's Cons utional, then I don't see why the states would have the power to materially interfere with their charter.

[Spurtacular]

Sure.

Also, at the typical ambivalent affirmation from Chump.

[Pavlov]

If it's Cons utional, then I don't see why the states would have the power to materially interfere with their charter.

1) Is "materially interfere" a legal term or something you just made up?

2) What is the legal basis for your opinion?

[Pavlov]

Also, at the typical ambiguous affirmation from Chump.

What part of "sure" is ambiguous?

Explain or back down again.

[Spurtacular]

What part of "sure" is ambiguous?

Explain or back down again.

Ambivalent, as I just made the change. Go ahead and explicitly state that ICE is a cons utionally ins uted organization, or stand down.

[Chris]

so glad i stopped dealing with that ing ... you should try it yourself spurt and just ghost the loser from here on out. it's been a great 2 weeks on ST since...