Page 2 of 202 FirstFirst 1234561252102 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 5036
  1. #26
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    I'm claiming you're completely full of shit calling that tweet fascism.

    You are 100% wrong.

    Is that clear?
    Are you claiming that the government lends no material support to these oppressors of free speech?

    Yes or no.

  2. #27
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Yout have a knack for things blowing up in your face immediately.



    Now that would be fascism.

  3. #28
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Are you claiming that the government lends no material support to these oppressors of free speech?

    Yes or no.
    I'm claiming your characterization is ridiculous and these companies are not oppressors of free speech and a tweet is not material support.

    Your question is complete bullshit.

    Absolutely none of your premises are true.

    Is that clear?

    Yes or no.

  4. #29
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    I'm claiming your characterization is ridiculous and these companies are not oppressors of free speech and a tweet is not material support.

    Your question is complete bullshit.

    Absolutely none of your premises are true.

    Is that clear?

    Yes or no.
    Are you claiming that these big media companies in question receive no material support from the government?

    Yes or no.

  5. #30
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Are you claiming that these big media companies in question receive no material support from the government?

    Yes or no.
    lol what do you think "material support" means? I only know the definition used for terrorism -- and that ain't tweets -- so you're going to have to say what you mean here.

  6. #31
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    32,222
    lol what do you think "material support" means? I only know the definition used for terrorism -- and that ain't tweets -- so you're going to have to say what you mean here.
    I think he's trying to say the govermnent supplements them with some sort of monitary aid?

    If that's what he's going for, he's wrong. These are privately owned companies.

  7. #32
    #freeshit 2020 Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    33,373
    Yout have a knack for things blowing up in your face immediately.



    lol dailybeast
    _____________________________




    The devil trembles when he knows the body is the temple and God is in you
    It's hard to continue when it's hard to offend you
    He snarls and sets traps, that have you setback
    The last round in this death match
    So strengthen where you're best at
    I promise you won't regret that
    -KP

  8. #33
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Well, for the record Chris -- would you want Trump to have the power to shut down media companies by decree?

  9. #34
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    lol what do you think "material support" means? I only know the definition used for terrorism -- and that ain't tweets -- so you're going to have to say what you mean here.
    A recipient directly benefiting from materials such as goods, moneys, services, infrastructure, etc provided by the referred-to party.

  10. #35
    #freeshit 2020 Chris's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    33,373
    Well, for the record Chris -- would you want Trump to have the power to shut down media companies by decree?
    How would he shut them down? Coordinated deplatforming, or are we wheeling out the guillotine?

  11. #36
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    A recipient directly benefiting from materials such as goods, moneys, services, infrastructure, etc provided by the referred-to party.
    For companies worth $24 and $540 billion, nothing significant.

    But do explain your conspiracy theory.

  12. #37
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    14,958
    I think he's trying to say the govermnent supplements them with some sort of monitary aid?

    If that's what he's going for, he's wrong. These are privately owned companies.
    Privately owned companies receiving billions in government tax subsidies.

  13. #38
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    How would he shut them down? Coordinated deplatforming, or are we wheeling out the guillotine?
    Not killing anyone. Just shutting down media outlets he didn't like.

    Would you support this or oppose this?

  14. #39
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Privately owned companies receiving billions in government tax subsidies.
    And?

    You guys really need to flesh out your twitter conspiracy theories.

  15. #40
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    For companies worth $24 and $540 billion, nothing significant.

    But do explain your conspiracy theory.
    Sociopath chump having to fall on "nothing significant" and makes it relative to the money like a plutocrat minion.
    ElNono could explain the material support these companies receive from the govt. better than I can.

  16. #41
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    14,958
    And?

    You guys really need to flesh out your twitter conspiracy theories.
    I donít have a conspiracy theory I was just correcting Reckís incorrect statement. Was I wrong?

  17. #42
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Sociopath chump having to fall on "nothing significant" and makes it relative to the money like a plutocrat minion.
    ElNono could explain the material support these companies receive from the govt. better than I can.
    Great. For discuission's sake let's say your contention that it's very significant is correct.

    Now what?

  18. #43
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    I don’t have a conspiracy theory I was just correcting Reck’s incorrect statement. Was I wrong?
    Maybe not.

    I don't have the figures for each company.

    But now what?

  19. #44
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    Great. For discuission's sake let's say your contention that it's very significant is correct.

    Now what?
    Then the government has a lawful expectation that Constitutional rights of Americans will not be violated by the services they 'significantly' help to facilitate, particularly as it relates to "public forums."

  20. #45
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    Then the government has a lawful expectation that Constitutional rights of Americans will not be violated by the services they 'significantly' help to facilitate, particularly as it relates to "public forums."
    lol no.

    That's not how it works.

    No one has a constitutional right to a twitter account.

  21. #46
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    lol no.

    That's not how it works.

    No one has a constitutional right to a twitter account.
    So, you believe that the government can put forth its resources for denying the Constitutional rights of the citizenry?

    Today's sociopath chump
    "lol no"

  22. #47
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    So, you believe that the government can put forth its resources for denying the Constitutional rights of the citizenry?
    lol no.

    There is no constitutional right to a YouTube account.

  23. #48
    4X ST MVP Spurtacular's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    40,790
    lol no.

    There is no constitutional right to a YouTube account.
    That's not what I'm arguing, sociopath chump.

  24. #49
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,901
    That's not what I'm arguing, sociopath chump.
    That's exactly what you are arguing.

    Then the government has a lawful expectation that Constitutional rights of Americans will not be violated by the services they 'significantly' help to facilitate, particularly as it relates to "public forums."
    It's 100% wrong.

    Facebook is not violating any constitutional rights by terminating accounts that violate its TOS.

    Perioid.

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    10,303
    Yout have a knack for things blowing up in your face immediately.



    Rick Wilson and an online poll provided exclusively to the daily beast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •