Warren is polling better than most.
warren has discussed that position
she's polling at ~15%
that means that discussion is being had by people in DC?
Are you in the discussion now or just a drive by?
Efforts to overhaul the Electoral College, one of the oldest ins utions in the U.S. political system, are ramping up as the country moves into the 2020 presidential election cycle.
Critics have called the Electoral College antidemocratic after the College decided two of the past five presidential elections. George W. Bush and Donald Trump both lost the national popular vote in their respective elections in 2000 and 2016, but went on to become president.
On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, led by Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz, and with support from Democratic Sens. Durbin of Illinois, Dianne Feinstein of California and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York—also a 2020 presidential contender—introduced a cons utional amendment to do away with the ins ution altogether.
But why do they want to abolish it? Here’s what you need to know.
https://fortune.com/2019/04/02/aboli...college-votes/
Yes the discussion is being had.
Phil
you directly linked it to warren's poll numbers, not meEfforts to overhaul the Electoral College, one of the oldest ins utions in the U.S. political system, are ramping up as the country moves into the 2020 presidential election cycle.
Critics have called the Electoral College antidemocratic after the College decided two of the past five presidential elections. George W. Bush and Donald Trump both lost the national popular vote in their respective elections in 2000 and 2016, but went on to become president.
On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, led by Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz, and with support from Democratic Sens. Durbin of Illinois, Dianne Feinstein of California and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York—also a 2020 presidential contender—introduced a cons utional amendment to do away with the ins ution altogether.
But why do they want to abolish it? Here’s what you need to know.
https://fortune.com/2019/04/02/aboli...college-votes/
Yes the discussion is being had.
Phil
you could have just looked something up earlier instead of throwing that on the wall in the first place
This is what happens when you butt in without knowing the conversation.you directly linked it to warren's poll numbers, not me
you could have just looked something up earlier instead of throwing that on the wall in the first place
I said I was referring to Washington DC. El Nono said only Warren was supporting it. I mentioned her polling because she's not a "nobody" in DC or in the election. Then you pretended DC wasn't discussing it. I showed you they are.
You caught up yet?
You could have entered the conversation with more class instead of being an asshole, but you didn't.
DMC whining about "class"
i was following along. you threw out her polling and it made no sense in the context of the conversation
warren has discussed that position
she's polling at ~15%
that means that discussion is being had by people in DC?
You showed your ass and got embarrassed. All that schooling and yet you have no class.
i was following along. you threw out her polling and it made no sense in the context of the conversation
DMC is really salty during wartime.
det revisionist history. i mean its right there
you brought up warren's poll numbers and i pointed out that it was nonsense to draw any correlation from that. now you're upset about it.
It was right there before you showed your ass. You just didn't take time to read it.det revisionist history. i mean its right there
you brought up warren's poll numbers and i pointed out that it was nonsense to draw any correlation from that. now you're upset about it.
I didn't bring up Warren's poll numbers to you. 5 minute rule saves face (in your case that might not be a good idea).
That’s a year old, coming out of the mid terms. There’s always rumbles one these things, but as usual, it’s more noise than action. Frankly, makes sense, there’s simply no political avenue right now for an amendment.Efforts to overhaul the Electoral College, one of the oldest ins utions in the U.S. political system, are ramping up as the country moves into the 2020 presidential election cycle.
Critics have called the Electoral College antidemocratic after the College decided two of the past five presidential elections. George W. Bush and Donald Trump both lost the national popular vote in their respective elections in 2000 and 2016, but went on to become president.
On Tuesday, Senate Democrats, led by Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz, and with support from Democratic Sens. Durbin of Illinois, Dianne Feinstein of California and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York—also a 2020 presidential contender—introduced a cons utional amendment to do away with the ins ution altogether.
But why do they want to abolish it? Here’s what you need to know.
https://fortune.com/2019/04/02/aboli...college-votes/
Yes the discussion is being had.
Phil
How neoliberal Democrats helped set the stage for Trump's war on Iran
Very good piece wether you're a leftist or right-winger
You advocated that a MAGA supporter kill himself; so, I'm gonna say you.
Another derp alt.
Why so many alts?
Dems Won't Abandon Losing Strategies and Centrism!
Yeah, that's bs, but it is illustrative of what a lot of right wingers seem to think free speech is for: protecting the right to shout n*****, n*****, n*****!
No need to add any qualifiers after this.
From my experience the non-blacks that use the N-word the most openly are those that engage in and consume black culture.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
