That's called layering (for deniability). Hillary was hundred percent behind those recounts, Lite.
This is a troll post.
That's called layering (for deniability). Hillary was hundred percent behind those recounts, Lite.
being completely serious.
its natural that you wouldn't want to wear a mask while giving a speech, so that you can be heard more clearly. but its good messaging to the people to show that you would otherwise be wearing your mask, so that they are reminded of its importance. if he just showed up to the podium without a mask, could send the wrong signal
so you cant show anything besides your redpilled intuition.
for whatever reason though, clinton conceded the election and did not herself ask for any recounts.
I don't care to go digging if that's what you're asking. Jimmy Dore has reported multiple times on his show that it was Hillary's big donors funding the recounts.
oh your vague memory of something jimmy dore said? that seals it then
What about "multiple times" would make you think "vague", Lite?
SMH
spurraider21 The groundwork was laid by guess who?
https://campaignlegal.org/update/how...-funded-anywayAlthough Stein may only accept donations of up to $2,700 for her campaign’s recount fund, the Green Party itself may accept checks of up to $100,200 to fund recount efforts.
This is thanks to a last-minute budget rider added to the “cromnibus” spending bill in late 2014.
That provision allows an individual donor to give an eye-popping $100,200 each to three newly created party accounts, including one “to defray expenses incurred with respect to the preparation for and the conduct of election recounts and contests and other legal proceedings.” Notably, the provision was crafted by Marc Elias, the top lawyer for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
its vague by definition. you've given no specifics of anything. how did clinton pay? is there proof of these payments?
bill passed 376-5 in the house and passed in the senate with more dems opposing the bill than republicans
but yes pin it all one one guy
Yea, that's nice. Too bad we aren't debating that Dems and Repubs are in cahoots or not.
So, basically Hillary's campaign paid all or most of the legal costs of lawyers.
The DNC, in contrast, reportedly raised millions in big checks for its recount account during the course of the 2016 cycle.
Although the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party didn’t initially support Stein’s recount effort, now that the process has begun, Elias says the campaign has become involved “to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.”
The DNC apparently won’t be dipping into its recount account to pay for the costs of the recount – those will be shouldered by the Stein campaign – but it may use those funds to pay Elias and other Clinton attorneys.
Dems only make up fake problems. They don't solve real problems.
Last edited by Spurtacular; 09-29-2020 at 08:39 PM.
These are the kind of judges that Joe wants to appoint to the Supreme Court.
Tough though. ACB getting confirmed.
Last edited by Spurtacular; 09-29-2020 at 08:43 PM.
Soros's DA's propping up the terrorists.
wallace is absolutely right
and again, nothing to do with fascism. the streak continues!
Of course it does. Jews had to wear their badges for "safety".
masks arent forms of identification that certain ethnic groups are forced to wear
It's a form of submission. They've done ankle monitors too if that makes you feel better.
who have they done ankle monitors for, derp?
To whom is Trump submitting when he wears a mask?
Derp knows submission by hearing his mom getting nailed by strangers.
Hate to see how it affects the basement dwelling derp.
She's right.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)