Democrats Looking To Ramp Up The Fascism

[ChumpDumper]

Shows us these numbers, yuppers.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP reportedly plans to send nearly 3,000 more troops to the Middle East following his decision to kill Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani – a move that risks further escalation in the region....

....The new deployment serves as the latest escalation from both Washington and Tehran in recent weeks. Days before ordering the airstrike that killed Soleimani, Trump ordered early 1,000 Army airborne troops and Marines into Iraq in response to violent protests outside the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad last week....

....Between May and December, Trump deployed an additional 15,000 troops to the Middle East amid what defense, diplomatic and intelligence officials said was an increased threat posed by the Islamic Republic.

https://www.usnews.com/news/national...ran-escalation

Can you add those numbers up or do you need your hand held?

You may now begin your meltdown and whine about anything but the thing you asked about.

[Spurtacular]

https://www.usnews.com/news/national...ran-escalation

Can you add those numbers up or do you need your hand held?

You may now begin your meltdown and whine about anything but the thing you asked about.

Chump shamelessly pretending those numbers correlate to his piggybacked point.

Yea, how about you spell it out, asshole. You can't; your fake case can't be spelled out.

[ChumpDumper]

Chump shamelessly pretending those numbers correlate to his piggybacked point.

Yea, how about you spell it out, asshole. You can't; your fake case can't be spelled out.

Troop levels are up in the middle east.

You approve.

[Spurtacular]

Troop levels are up in the middle east.

You approve.

Up from Obama?

You can't just look at some deployment and think that's proof of something significant.

[ChumpDumper]

Up from Obama?

You can't just look at some deployment and think that's proof of something significant.

So, for the record, you approve of the troop increase?

Yes or no.

[Blake]

Chump shamelessly pretending those numbers correlate to his piggybacked point.

Yea, how about you spell it out, asshole. You can't; your fake case can't be spelled out.

Derp needs abc spelled out. It's pretty simple stuff, .

[ChumpDumper]

Derp needs abc spelled out. It's pretty simple stuff, .

Eh, he's gonna fold, then whine.

Like always.

[Winehole23]

Up from Obama?

You can't just look at some deployment and think that's proof of something significant.

Bombing and civilian casualties went up too. Way up.


https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/09...dented-levels/

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/02/...asualties-war/

https://www.thenation.com/article/ar...drone-strikes/

[ChumpDumper]

Bombing and civilian casualties went up too. Way up.


https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/09...dented-levels/

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/02/...asualties-war/

https://www.thenation.com/article/ar...drone-strikes/

Man, derp is lovin' him some Trump escalation.

[Spurtacular]

So, for the record, you approve of the troop increase?

Yes or no.

So, for the record you have no substantive numbers to give your claim any worthwhile significance.

[Spurtacular]

Bombing and civilian casualties went up too. Way up.


https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/09...dented-levels/

https://theintercept.com/2019/10/02/...asualties-war/

https://www.thenation.com/article/ar...drone-strikes/

Oh, look: More links and nothing typed in lay man's terms.

[Spurtacular]

Derp needs abc spelled out. It's pretty simple stuff, .

Go ahead and tell us these simple conclusions with listed evidence, cuck.

Nah? Just ankle biting? I thought so.

[Winehole23]

Oh, look: More links and nothing typed in lay man's terms.

All articles written in English.

Do you require spoon feeding? The info at the links support the two short English sentences in my initial reply to you, for which you requested support.

It's there, if you'll read it

[Spurtacular]

All articles written in English.

Do you require spoon feeding?

I require you to list your case. I'm not going to go digging through links trying to piece together a case for you.

[Winehole23]

I require you to list your case. I'm not going to go digging through links trying to piece together a case for you.

Bombing, drone strikes, troop levels in the Middle East and and civilian casualties all up under Trump.

That's my argument, support can be found at the links. Not challenging for anyone who really wants to find out.

Do you need me to pull quotes for you?

[Winehole23]

In the time it takes you to reply to me, and to CD and to Blake, you could have educated yourself.

Are you allergic to reading?

[spurraider21]

derp hates it when people provide sources for their claims

[Winehole23]

derp hates it when people provide sources for their claims

Seems to have ghosted.

Usually he rants and raves for hours.

[ChumpDumper]

derp folds and storms off

[Spurtacular]

derp hates it when people provide sources for their claims

Not at all. But I'm still not going to make someone's case for them.

[ChumpDumper]

Not at all. But I'm still not going to make someone's case for them.

The case has been made. You're whining about it.

[Spurtacular]

The case has been made. You're whining about it.

AnkleHumper / Blake's cuckstie

'Evidence' in and of itself is a case

lol Dump

[Spurtacular]

In the time it takes you to reply to me, and to CD and to Blake, you could have educated yourself.

Are you allergic to reading?

Who says I didn't read any of your links? It's still not my job to make your premises and conclusions for you.

[Spurtacular]

Seems to have ghosted.

Usually he rants and raves for hours.

Blakehole crying out that he's not getting enough attention.

[ChumpDumper]

Who says I didn't read any of your links?

You asked for them.

If you don't want to find out what you asked for, why are you here?