This can be traced back to you pivoting from a question about who has more murderers, Repubs or Dems.
You gave us a conspiracy theory and took a pass on answering the factual reality.
?
Dale asked me and I answered.
Why do you think the Republicans are so dead set on having the election tomorrow?
Step up.
This can be traced back to you pivoting from a question about who has more murderers, Repubs or Dems.
You gave us a conspiracy theory and took a pass on answering the factual reality.
Oh, your distraction attempt?
Sorry I didn't bite.
Try being relevant sometime.
I don't care what you bit into or didn't.
It's obviously stupid to be "too scared" to answer a question and then in the next breath cry to others that you weren't "too scared" to answer a question.
ing psychopath
Of course you do.
You're posting about it right now.
You ran like a from a question and then immediately boasted that you weren't too scared to answer a question like others.
The non psychopaths and non riders see the humor.
Thread
Why should I waste time with your distraction attempts?
We were discussing an actual topic.
Sorry.
Why should I answer your distraction from the fact that you're a little for doing what you did?
Not sorry.
ing psychopath
OK, don't.
Good talk.
I'm scared but gonna brag not too scared
ing psychopath
Same ole .
I'll answer on topic questions that aren't a waste of time.
Got any?
You keep pushin' dem goalposts, psychopath.
Do you have any on topic questions or not?
Yep. But youll keep on. It's all you know.
I wouldn't put it past them that this is entirely about 'sticking it to the lib governor', tbh, such is the level of acrimony these days. Even if it involves putting people at risk.
How do you gloss it?
Low voter turnout may favor the Republicans when it's a choice to just not go vote because of being lazy but when it's a health issue that's not the same thing. I think it's intellectually lazy to just call Republicans or democrats a death cult as an excuse for a poor showing at the polls.
I was a lot like everyone in this forum up until the crisis in 2007. I was a die hard republican and defender of Bush. Then came TARP and I began to reflect back on the Patriot Act and other things he did. I realized quickly that he was not what I considered conservative. I couldn't believe Obama got elected and then continued Bush's spending spree and war in the middle east. Most people tend to look for excuses for their "chosen one" to explain why things didn't go so well, and that is the trap. Everyone wants to beilieve their "party" is the good guy and if only we can get the presidency or house, then man things will be different. Trump took over and Obamacare was suppose to be gone.... nope, not gonna happen.
The hardest part about where most of you are right now, is you can't accept that your "party" is maybe just as much a part of the problem as the other side. G. Edward Griffin talks about the two party paradigm. It's pretty eye opening. The media and politicians do a good job of keeping us in that paradigm by using social issues, foreign policies, and spending policies to keep us divided.
You can always be sure of these things regardless of which side of the isle is in power:
1. The national debt will increase if not double every two terms
2. The size and power of the government will increase
3. We will always be in conflict with other countries that don't play by the rules and replace their gov'ts
Both parties are about collectivism. Collectivism depends on a central and powerful government. The founding fathers tried very hard to protect us from this. When you study the history and what they had to say about these situations, you begin to see things differently.
For the greater good sounds great until your outside the greater good. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on whats for dinner.
Mosaic of evidence, it isn't like this is the only peg to hang it on.
It's poignant that the court decision requiring WI to hold the election today was rendered remotely -- to protect the justices.
So why do you think the Republicans insisted on having the election today?
You never really said.
That's a bit of a red herring. Since the younger crowd votes for the left, and since the virus has much less severe effect on the younger crowd, why would the left suffer? It's not like the younger crowd has to be in school today or that they have to be at work.
Other than just a generic statement that the right normally benefits from low voter turnout, how is this particular event benefiting the right?
Behold and feel the safety.
Seriously, what's the good civics rationale here? Is there one?
We just laughing at this ass hat, or do you have a larger point here?
He's one helmet away from being an astronaut.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)