Reply With Quote
“If Mueller won’t clear the president, and Sessions won’t unrecuse, then we are the only ones”
Meaning
“We are the only ones who can stop it”
Really, how?
“If Mueller won’t clear the president, and Sessions won’t unrecuse, then we are the only ones”
Meaning
“We are the only ones who can stop it”
seems a clear allusion to impeachment as a possible eventuality: Dems could take the House in November.
look at the context: Nunes was speaking at a fundraiser for a House candidate. the GOP needs every seat to stop impeachment.
I'm no legalese but isn't trying to impede an active investigation...illegal?
One can say there is real intent in the part of Nunes and his band of idiots to want to squash the investigation because they fear losing the majority. There you have reason and intent.
At the same time, saying it and putting that strategy into action are different things.
But again, what the do I know.
this is news? lmao @ maddow and dip s like djohn
I don't see how Nunes is impeding anything.
If he tries to impede impeachment that's not obstruction: impeachment is not a judicial proceeding, but a political one.
and Nunes takes into account that Mueller finds Trump committed a crime. In that case Stopping impeachment would be obstruction. He even also admits using stolen emails is a crime
stopping impeachment would not be obstruction. impeachment falls under Article I.
Nunes admits a crime took place. And is looking to impede the investigation.
argumentative.
what you call an admission is a private opinion lacking any probative value vis a vis Mueller's investigation of the Trump campaign, and your ascription of intent, though plausible enough, is baldly asserted without any factual support.
Nunes has seen evidence. Don’t give me that . And a congressman doesn’t know the law?
Nunes's private opinion about the legality of using stolen emails is of as much consequence to Bob Mueller as mine or yours. zilch.
Nunes has seen evidence and been briefed. That ain’t gonna fly.
I think you're overhyping this.
See if Nunes declines comment. Then you will know.
What you're saying is a stretch.
I get that you don't like Nunes, that you think all of DJT's allies are criminals and that each new Kyle Griffin tweet discloses criminality, but it ain't so just because you want it to be true.
This thread is going well for you.
your failure rate approaches 100%
The job of Congress is to be a check and balance on the executive branch. Not to clear the president should crimes be found. Nunes seemed concerned Trump would not be cleared.
Last edited by djohn2oo8; 08-09-2018 at 10:57 AM.
djohn had his bubble burst by a Team Blue dude and is upset.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
