really?
Schumer, Pelosi, DiFi are moribund placeholders, ain't gonna re-invent about the Dems.
Dems are quite content to around, compliant in their silence when screaming outrage is fully justifiied, and let the Repugs up govt, up the country, run a brutal racial ethnic cleansing campaign
they ain't gonna do
Where were they when Hillary was running a ty campaign?
re-invention? G M A F B
Give the Dems some credit, they didn't have the numbers to win this fight but then again the GOP didn't have the proof against Hillary's email scandal nor Bengazi, but they just kept repeating the lie and their base bought in...
https://thinkprogress.org/leading-de...-30bac4383e9d/The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee says he will investigate alleged perjury and sexual misconduct by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, and slammed a "whitewash" probe completed by the FBI earlier this week.
The New York Times reported that Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), who will head the Judiciary Committee if Democrats take over the House after November's elections, said that the legitimacy of the Supreme Court is at stake, as the Senate prepared Saturday to confirm Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court.
Trump will be busy defending himself from the Mueller investigation and his little tax problem.....should be interesting times after the election....
just lie back and enjoy it.
there's rape and there's legitimate rape
the latter kind doesn't cause pregnancy
The question is how many more elections are they going to lose to figure it out, or if they find a catalyst. But it's happening one way or another.
It's easy to dramatize now, but it was only 6 years ago Obama was winning re-election fairly comfortably.
The GOP was in the same conundrum pre-Trump. Everybody and their mother thought Mitch was a sellout, and there was no way forward. Then they dropped the social conservative charade and pushed through.
Now, I’m of the understanding that in many cases of rape it does not involve any pregnancy because of the trauma of the incident...that may be true with incest a little bit
Being a father of five girls, I’ve explored this a lot
Unfortunately, ignorance knows no bounds.
oh man, that was some
When was that? Trump's list of judges he'd appoint to attack Roe vs Wade was a huge part of him getting elected.
don't forget "they can flush it out", don't get pregnant from rape if they don't want to
For the election, they gladly overlooked the "grab em by the pussy", the fact that he's married and re-married 26327638234 times...
Heck, one would argue that even after the election, Dear Leader pretty much admitted to be an adulterer and multiple porn actresses, and obviously, nary a peep from the congregation.
They did the math and that was the equation. Now that they're in power, you're going to get a mixed bag. But for all intents and purposes, the game is getting to power, and possibly, staying there.
I mean, they ed and moaned so much about an outsider because politicos are career liars, and I don't think I'm stretching reality much at all stating this guy is the worst liar I can think if in the WH since I was born (which is quite a feat).
What does that have to do with dropping social conservatism? Dismantling Roe Vs Wade is peak social conservatism. So is cracking down on illegals because they're rapists who claim MS-13. Trump's executive order allowing churches to be overtly political and remain tax exempt isn't social conservative? I don't understand this point you keep making that social conservatism is dead just because Trump is a hypocrite. The evangelicals just spin it as forgiving him for being a flawed man because only jeebus is without sin.
It's partly because Donald Trump has no political or religious convictions whatsoever that he can go so much further to the right than his subordinates, and I think he's doing that. After a long long walk in the political wilderness, footsore religious pilgrims (and other kooky conservatives who somehow managed to hang on long enough) begin to see their just reward.
Donald Trump is about to give them the goodies. Think of Trump as being a kind of Moses for white people in particular and sadistic people in general.
A Supreme Court justice isn't nothing. Of course he'll be forgiven for his humanizing and pathetic human frailties, how is that even a question?
Did we hear that when Obama ran for president some facebook executives and white house executives traded places so that Obama would get the full cooperation of facebook and lists of facebook subscribers who leaned Democrat? Not on Yahoo
yeah, let's talk about Obama now.
The point is that he's actually not a social conservative, nor he lives his life as a social conservative, he's made that readily public and available. He just says and does because that's convenient for him, and that's the conduit to power.
Remember before the elections the whole 'moral litmus test' for social conservatism? How Teddy was the moral compass for conservatism? Let's go further back, remember that Romney didn't win the election because he wasn't conservative enough? The whole thing is a big charade.
Trump is way, way less socially conservative than either (we could make the argument he's just as conservative on economics as both). The notion that people will largely look at your social conservative creds to elect you was proven to be a complete fallacy.
Obviously, the man now wants to please his crowd, and having a Congress ready and willing, he's going to pass every conservative dream that's been waiting in the wings forever, including the southern socially awkward agenda (which will eventually be overturned in time, wherever possible).
That said, now the cat is out of the bag, and he's not really any less of a flat out liar than your average politico, so the question is how people will eventually react to that, vis a vis, whoever the Democrats put in front of him.
His social conservative cards are pretty strong based on how he has governed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
