This is some new type of self pity grovelling. Holy .
No wonder Darrin, Chris and those 50 year old virgins like this guy so much. he's pure
You really have no clue as to what I have been saying.
Go back and reread my posts you clueless piece of .
Another corroborated instant in which another person present tells stories/answers to questions that are too similar, yet asked independently, is why the 2nd acuusser’s claims must be given merit you dumb piece of fecal material.
And your other bizarre assessment of MY intentions get shot down just like this.
You just don’t like to admit when you are a dead wrong wit.
This is some new type of self pity grovelling. Holy .
No wonder Darrin, Chris and those 50 year old virgins like this guy so much. he's pure
another incel
Over 900 Yale alumnae sign open letter in support of Deborah Ramirez
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/24/1798349/-Over-900-female-Yale-alumnae-sign-open-letter-in-support-of-Deborah-Ramirez?detail=emaildkre
Even boots gets it...
His response above to my same post.
There are probably a number of people waiting in the line with worthwhile AND absolutel fiction. It takes time to ferret them out when the ball gets rolling when you might have a guy who had/has? no respect for women.
Kavanaugh went to Yale.
There he joined the fraternity Delta Kappa Epsilon, or DKE, which was, according to The Yale Daily News,
“notorious for disrespecting women.”
(Long after Kavanaugh graduated, the fraternity,
once headed by George W. Bush,
was banned from campus after video emerged of pledges chanting,
“No Means Yes! Yes Means Anal!”)
Kavanaugh was also a member of an all-male secret society called Truth and Courage, which had an obscene nickname affirming its dedication to womanizing.
Kavanaugh went on to become a protégé of appeals court judge Alex Kozinski, for whom he clerked in the early 1990s.
Last year, Kozinski resigned after multiple accusations of sexual harassment by former female clerks and junior staffers;
two said he showed them porn in his office.
The judge’s lewd behavior was, by many accounts, an open secret.
“All the clerks and former clerks in Kozinski’s ambit knew and understood that you assumed the risk and accepted the responsibilities of secrecy,”
His story shows, in lurid microcosm,
how a certain class of men guard and perpetuate their privileges.
Women who struggle ceaselessly to be smart enough,
attractive enough,
ambitious enough and
likable enough
have been playing a rigged game.
As they realize that, their incandescent fury is remaking our politics.
We’ll know things have changed when palling around with sexual abusers carries more stigma than being abused does.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/opinion/columnists/kavanaugh-georgetown-supreme-court.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
Ah yes, while those 100 keg parties were happening he was shuttered in his room reading The Bible and Atlas Shrugged like a good Christian boy.
Have you boofed yet?
FFFFFFourth of July
No one's answered Winehole's query about Gorsuch, oddly enough.
which query?
It’s a good example because so many people rushed to assume they were guilty. Because fraternity jocks
About where all the sexual assault accusers were for Gorsuch if this was just the Democrats making up to stop a supreme court nomination.
you got me wrong CH. i am not against her and for him at all. i am merely against the masses being judge&jury without due process like our judicial system allows. that's basically it.
however, i do think ford and the rest are political pawns and their accusations seem ridiculous with little to no info to corroborate. what gets me is the fact these women are coming forward now and not when SpecialK was climbing the ladder up to SC. it all just seems fishy especially when you follow the money and those who are speaking for these "victims".
ps: sorry about that ex. we've all dealt with one or a few of the same. at least you walked away and didn't let the toxicity bring you down too.
I guess Gorsuch wasn't a sexual asshole/predator.
K has a sorrowful trail of mistreated, unhappy ladies that Gorsuch doesn't.
Yes, that one instance 12 years ago is an example of men who were unfairly convicted by the court of public opinion. It's kind of weird, though, that you have to go back to an incident 12 years ago every time the topic comes up. Doesn't that tell you it's probably not a widespread problem?
Gorsuch was not a painful change for the left. He was replacing Scalia, and so that kept status quo. But Kavanaugh is another matter to them because he is replacing Kennedy, the swing vote of the group. Not only is there more urgency to stop him, but there is more urgency to de-legitimize him if he gets on the bench. Moreover, their base demands that they get in the mud and do whatever is necessary to stop this nomination from happening. If the Dems don't, they will hear it from their base.
That's why the Dems are scouring Yale and asking for people to come forward. That's also why they are helping people remember important facts that they forgot, like that Kavanaugh did it and not someone else.
Also, if for some reason Kavanaugh is not confirmed and Dems retake the Senate, don't think for a second that the Dems will confirm any Trump nomination until after the 2020 election. They will stall for two years (unless he nominates Garland).
gorsuch was pre me too
Gorsuch was replacing Merrick Garland, really. If we're talking about Democrats inventing a narrative out of thin air, there's no reason to believe they wouldn't have targeted Gorsuch as retaliation. Yet several Democrats voted to confirm him.
Lol, this attention .
Drinking game - drink for every mention of Mark Judge
Won’t name his mystery accuser. Seems like now might be a good time.
Kavanaugh allies ask to have signatures removed from statement supporting him
http://theweek.com/speedreads/797943/kavanaugh-allies-ask-have-signatures-removed-from-statement-supporting
I think they'll go along with a candidate similar to Garland even if it's not Garland. They'll approve a moderate. Trump may have to find a nominee somewhere outside of the Heritage/Federalist Society litmus. That's not a bad thing.
Honestly the whole President-nominates-Senate-approves process needs to be re-examined.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)