Honduran Migrants in Caravan Sue Trump, Say Cons utional Rights Violated

[Spurtacular]

Oh, so you don't have to have the Cons ution changed, then.

Today's sociopath.

[Pavlov]

Oh, so you don't have to have the Cons ution changed, then.

For equal protection, yes.

failing with both screen names.

[General Virtue]

For equal protection, yes.

failing with both screen names.

Policy is the same as the Cons ution (again)

[Pavlov]

Policy is the same as the Cons ution (again)

No one ever said that. You changed the subject after your ass was handed to you, so now you have to make up.

If you need it dumbed down for you some more, let me know.

[General Virtue]

No one ever said that. You changed the subject after your ass was handed to you, so now you have to make up.

If you need it dumbed down for you some more, let me know.

You said the Cons ution had to be changed, then you said it was policy. Hmmm; now why could you want it both ways?

[Spurtacular]

You said the Cons ution had to be changed, then you said it was policy. Hmmm; now why could you want it both ways?

Sociopath values

[Pavlov]

You said the Cons ution had to be changed, then you said it was policy. Hmmm; now why could you want it both ways?

You changed the subject from equal protection to housing, derp.

These are two different issues.

Do you need it dumbed down any further?

[Pavlov]

Sociopath values

you're talking with your own alt

[Spurtacular]

you're talking with your own alt

Sociopath value. Cons ution can be same as policy when it suits you.

Any answer can change or not make sense when it suits you.

[Pavlov]

Sociopath value. Cons ution can be same as policy when it suits you.

Nope.

You asked a different question so you got a different answer.

Do you need that dumbed down for you any more?

[Spurtacular]

Nope.

You asked a different question so you got a different answer.

Do you need that dumbed down for you any more?

You've dumbed it sufficiently. Thanks.

[Pavlov]

You've dumbed it sufficiently. Thanks.

Do you understand you asked two different questions, derp?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Do you understand you asked two different questions, derp?

Yes or no.

I understand you said the Cons ution needed to be changed, and then you said it was about policy instead. I'm okay with you having your sociopath truth though.

[Pavlov]

I understand you said the Cons ution needed to be changed, and then you said it was about policy instead. I'm okay with you having your sociopath truth though.

So you don't understand you asked two different questions.

lol derp

[CosmicCowboy]

This lawsuit should immediately be tossed. A Honduran in Mexico had zero standing under the 5th amendment.

[Chris]

This lawsuit should immediately be tossed. An Ecuadorian in Mexico had zero standing under the 5th amendment.

You didn't read the semicolon correctly.

[Pavlov]

This lawsuit should immediately be tossed. An Ecuadorian in Mexico had zero standing under the 5th amendment.

As soon as the people get to the border they will have standing.

[Winehole23]

You didn't read the semicolon correctly.

connects equal parts of sentence.

how do you read a semicolon?

[CosmicCowboy]

As soon as the people get to the border they will have standing.

I see you agree with me. It's a bogus lawsuit.

[Chris]

connects equal parts of sentence.

how do you read a semicolon?

The semicolon means everyone all over the world has cons utional rights.

[Pavlov]

I see you agree with me. It's a bogus lawsuit.

Probably. The court will decide.

[Winehole23]

The semicolon means everyone all over the world has cons utional rights.

within the United States, yes.

it's one of the things people admire about this country.

[Spurminator]

Love to see basement armchair grammarians questioning years of Cons utional precedent because semicolons are funnyLOL

[Pavlov]

Oh , did Chris actually try to ignore settled law via semicolon?

[Winehole23]

apparently he thinks punctuation is a matter of style in legal drafting