I heard buzzfeed gives your computer the AIDs.
Perez in ugly fight with state committees:
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...arties-1066665It‘s the latest fight in a quickly escalating war over the trove of Democratic voter information — a conflict that broke into the open at a gathering of the state parties and the DNC in Puerto Rico late last month. The party’s data are largely owned by the state parties, but a considerable amount of other data being collected by outside groups like labor unions and super PACs.
The DNC wants to gather all the data points on voters into a new, massive for-profit database but needs to convince state parties on the idea. The state parties have been wary, accusing the DNC of conducting a power grab that could financially benefit a few elite party figures.
https://readsludge.com/2018/12/17/de...gas-companies/Seven Democratic members of the House Energy Committee’s Energy and Environment subcommittees collectively own at least $2.3 million worth of stock in the oil and gas industry.
prime candidate for Dept of Interior: oil and gas lobbyist.
Both parties corrupted and operated by the oligarchy
...
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-18-2018 at 08:03 AM.
So this stuff works when it benefits Democrats?
Makes sense. The low awareness voter list is vomit inducing. Democrats should be against the candidates who were well-positioned for a run in 2016 but chose not to because they didn’t want to get in Hillary’s way (Biden Warren and arguably Booker being the biggest examples of that).
TSA with no take on his own RT in either of the threads he posted it in.
David Sirota scrutinizes Beto's votes:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...pital-and-mainHowever, a new analysis of congressional votes from the non-profit news organisation Capital & Main shows that even as O’Rourke represented one of the most solidly Democratic congressional districts in the United States, he has frequently voted against the majority of House Democrats in support of Republican bills and Trump administration priorities.
Capital & Main reviewed the 167 votesO’Rourke has cast in the House in opposition to the majority of his own party during his six-year tenure in Congress. Many of those votes were not progressive dissents alongside other left-leaning lawmakers, but instead votes to help pass Republican-sponsored legislation.
O’Rourke has voted for GOP bills that his fellow Democratic lawmakers said reinforced Republicans’ anti-tax ideology, chipped away at the Affordable Care Act (ACA), weakened Wall Street regulations, boosted the fossil fuel industry and bolstered Donald Trump’s immigration policy...
In the last two years, O’Rourke was among the top fifth of all lawmakers voting against his own party’s positions. FiveThirtyEighthas calculated that in that same time period, O’Rourke has voted for the Trump administration position roughly 30% of the time. The website said that is above what analysts predict would come from a legislator representing a district as Democratic as O’Rourke’s. For comparison, O’Rourke’s congressional district votes more Democratic than than most districts in Massachusetts, according to the Cook Political Report.
O’Rourke’s votes for Republican legislation – which at times put him at odds with a majority of Texas Democratic lawmakers in Congress – underscore his membership in the New Democrat Coalition, the faction of House Democrats most closely aligned with business interests.
Chris so excited by a black woman's trying to shade a Puerto Rican woman that he posts her tweet twice.
Actually, not true. They only pretend to relate to the poor they think will go out and vote, hence they do not give a single about the homeless.
exactly
On the other hand, Republicans love poor people!
Where are my poors? I love my poors!
In California they have safe spaces for the homeless where you can shoot up your heroin in peace. At least that's a start?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)