Is there hard-number substance behind this claim?
Is there hard-number substance behind this claim?
People who are registered can choose to not vote.
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton
Look at her backround picture
Are they at Comet Ping-Pong or something? Is she trafficking that kid?
Awesome.
Booker & Booker 2020... he's the biggest girl i've ever seen.
Sissy Spartacus
he's such a fraud pandering to the sjw's of this world and his party. i doubt he's anything like he is on the hill vs his everyday life. i've never seen such a feminine black male before; even black gay males are more man than booker.
I agree, he's incredibly effeminate. At the end of the day he is just another actor for the Democratic Party pushing iden y politics and race baiting whenever possible.
can you imagine how pissed acosta would be at booker's presidential pressers waving his hands around to ask a question but not realizing booker is looking straight at him with those googly fish eyes of his. "can i ask a question? president booker, i'm right here! can i ask a question mr. president?"
WOW. "We" voted this trash in smh
i mean we cant point to you and koriwhat as good evidence that people your age shouldn't vote
Do you think 16 year olds should be able to vote:
Yes or no?
spurraider21 o?
sorry im not on ST 100% of the time
i think it makes sense to tie it to age of employment. of course, not counting things like paper routes, or child actors. states typically have their own rules as to when someone is first eligible to work full time, or without consideration of school hours. if they're doing that, and paying taxes, then they should have a voice.
Was that a yes?
can you read?
states have their own rules for employment. imo when states are deciding who gets to vote, they should base it on the former.
It was a simple yes or no question. Was that a yes?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)