Reply With Quote
If I could get a good offer, I would bite. I am not a fan of undersized SG's. Just like I, although apparently not the PATFO, would trade Mills for the right offer...
Assuming Spurs have a losing record around the trading deadline would you “sell high” on Forbes? My thought is PATFO are never trading Patty Mills. I wish they would, but they probably won’t. With DJ coming back and Marco, Lonnie Walker and DeRozan at SG next year. Forbes has played better this season and may be able to retrieve a draft pick or a player who can actually play defense.
If I could get a good offer, I would bite. I am not a fan of undersized SG's. Just like I, although apparently not the PATFO, would trade Mills for the right offer...
yes. but i would also get rid of cancernelli
If you want to sell Forbes high, no need to panic -- just wait.
Nobody would trade for Forbes
I'm on the record already saying to move Forbes and both picks for the highest pick we get offered.
I would trade Marco first. Maybe to LA bc they need some shooting. Or send him back to Philly
Yes.
He's made some good shots.
His D appears like he will never be NBA level.
Unless he goes Curry lite (he won't) his O is always going to be canceled out by his D.
Simply another pick that shouldn't have been.
Popped probably liked his political views or some other .
Marco is definitely the kind of guy LeGM trades for midseason
I would sell high one of either Mills, Forbes, or Belinelli since they are largely redundant.
After this season, I think he'd be a prime candidate to be traded depending on the number of the Spurs pick.
Something like the 16th pick + plus Forbes to move up a few spots would make sense and also allow for us to keep the Raps pick.
If Walker looks half decent, then I would hope that it would be at least considered. Beli has been trash this season. It's hard to play worse than he has thus far.
What does it mean to "sell high" a player like Bryn Forbes?
Yes, despite what posters think he is one of our more valuable trade chips because he is a dead eye shooter on a cheap contract. Spurs can probably get something decent in return by pairing him with Gasol and pick.
That being said I would rather just keep him unless a really good offer comes along. He is worth more to SA because of his cheap deal and being one of the only reliable shooters we have. Plus he plays well next to Demar
Last edited by Leetonidas; 11-29-2018 at 06:18 PM.
Depends on what "high" means. He's cheap enough to hold onto in my "power tank into immediate retool" idea. He pairs well with Murray, White and DeRozan. He has value to the organization and is young enough to be around for a long time.
One of the biggest myths in the NBA is that point guards play defense.
He hardly makes anything what could we get in return?
I don't think Philly is a realistic destination, but yeah, move Marco first.
Forbes was a FA, not a pick.
Gary Payton says hi.
Exactly. He is probably our 4th best player and is dirt cheap. Much better value than any heads-up trade that you could make. I would much rather move Marco first.
It's like asking what kind of car you can buy for a hundred bucks, tbh.
Sell high? So we’d get a 2nd round pick instead of a GLeague Draft Pick for him?
Forbes (because of his contract) and Bertans would be the only shooters I would keep on the team, I would like to trade Marco, Mills, Gasol, Pond and the 2nd round to 2 nba level wings, sign Huestis (?) and I'd be fine with this
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
