Page 13 of 43 FirstFirst ... 39101112131415161723 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 1057
  1. #301
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,818
    Isn't she the chick who railed against the DNC for making it next to impossible to qualify for a debate because of the impossibly high standards of getting 2% in 2 polls?

    Even out of the 20+ candidates, she was always in the bottom tear.

  2. #302
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    Isn't she the chick who railed against the DNC for making it next to impossible to qualify for a debate because of the impossibly high standards of getting 2% in 2 polls?

    Even out of the 20+ candidates, she was always in the bottom tear.
    No

    She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.

  3. #303
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    She's not courageous enough to live stream a dental cleaning. I cannot vote for her.

  4. #304
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,818
    No

    She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.
    They listed the polls ahead of time. Its not like she got blindsided, 10 candidates did make the stage- the DNC wasn't rigged against them but her? That's pretty silly tbh. She did qualify for this past debate using similar criteria. The DNC was rigged against her the last time but not this time?

  5. #305
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    They listed the polls ahead of time. Its not like she got blindsided, 10 candidates did make the stage- the DNC wasn't rigged against them but her? That's pretty silly tbh. She did qualify for this past debate using similar criteria. The DNC was rigged against her the last time but not this time?
    No. They did not list which polls counted and which did not. That's the problem.they also don't post anywhere their criteria of deciding how a poll counts

  6. #306
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,818
    No. They did not list which polls counted and which did not. That's the problem.they also don't post anywhere their criteria of deciding how a poll counts
    They did, I remember reading about the polls that the DNC listed back in August and September. She just didn't qualify and blamed the DNC.

    For the November debate, the DNC announced the qualifications almost a month ago

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ebate-n1057751


    To qualify, candidates will need to hit 3 percent support in at least four early state or national polls that meet the DNC’s methodological requirements, up from 2 percent for the September and October debates.
    Gabbard has never hit 3 percent in a qualifying poll.
    If she doesn't qualify for the November debate, will she rail against the DNC for her not being popular enough to clear 3% in 4 polls? Frankly, it probably should be at least 5% to cut it down to five candidates. Its clearly between Warren, Sanders and Bernie, with the rest of them just hanging around.

  7. #307
    Veteran in2deep's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    4,104
    They did, I remember reading about the polls that the DNC listed back in August and September. She just didn't qualify and blamed the DNC.

    For the November debate, the DNC announced the qualifications almost a month ago

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ebate-n1057751






    If she doesn't qualify for the November debate, will she rail against the DNC for her not being popular enough to clear 3% in 4 polls? Frankly, it probably should be at least 5% to cut it down to five candidates. Its clearly between Warren, Sanders and Bernie, with the rest of them just hanging around.
    No no

    They listed the qualifying polls after the fact to show who qualified. They did not list them before the polls were taken and they don't have a complete list of which polls 2ould count and which would not. They also again I say, never posted their logic to decide how a poll is valid or not.

    That is a big problem as they basically can count or discount polls at will. The DNC is shady as especially since what happened to Bernie last year so they need to be called out.

    Tulsi and Yang are the only ones with balls

  8. #308
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,734
    LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.

    ormer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asserted that the Russians are attempting to undermine the 2020 election by backing Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii) as a third-party candidate, stating “she’s the favorite of the Russians.”

    Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Clinton made a number of claims regarding Russian meddling in U.S. elections, including that Gabbard’s substantial social-media support relies on Russian bots. Gabbard was the most-searched candidate after the first and second Democratic debates.

    “I think they’ve got their eye on someone who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said on the podcast. “She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”

  9. #309
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,737
    lery

    She's a vengeful and never forgave Tulsi from not supporting her in 2016

    Another reason to love Tulsi

    and another reason to be glad Trump won

  10. #310
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,022
    rcp average has her at 1.2%, behind booker and steyer ...

  11. #311
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    lery

    She's a vengeful and never forgave Tulsi from not supporting her in 2016

    Another reason to love Tulsi

    and another reason to be glad Trump won
    Hater in the darkroom eyes tightly closed swinging wildly hitting everyone.

  12. #312
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,737
    Hater in the darkroom eyes wide open swinging wildly hitting every establishment liberal/neocon.
    Fixed it for ya ma nig

  13. #313
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,737
    rcp average has her at 1.2%, behind booker and steyer ...
    Wasn't that Trump's chance in 2016?

    BTW Tulsi is priming herself for 2024. This is just a test run

  14. #314
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    Those pockmarks tho.
    lol Tulsi doesn't meet Chumps standards

  15. #315
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.
    Well, they do seem to like Tulsi. Wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility tbh.

  16. #316
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    lol Tulsi doesn't meet Chumps standards
    Do you like her pockmarks?

    You think they're sexy?

    lol

    She's pretty good looking otherwise.

  17. #317
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    Do you like her pockmarks?

    You think they're sexy?

    lol
    She's a good looking women.

  18. #318
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    She's a good looking women.
    Just one last I checked.

  19. #319
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,022
    tusli's good looking imo

  20. #320
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Pretty sure Tulsi is that old debul. She been put up to the task by Satan. She sent to get in the way of Warren, to be a roadblock for her but God won't put more on her plate than she can handle. Warren will lead us to Salvation.

  21. #321
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    18,121
    Just one last I checked.
    lol only the most perfect woman will do for the forum spellchecker

  22. #322
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,737
    Lol chump

  23. #323
    Believe. Pavlov's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    41,752
    lol only the most perfect woman will do for the forum spellchecker
    Relax, it's a joke.

    She's a good looking woman with bad skin. It happens.

    ST posters getting defensive about a politician's skin.

  24. #324
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    Relax, it's a joke.

    She's a good looking woman with bad skin. It happens.

    ST posters getting defensive about a politician's skin.
    What about those elbows?

  25. #325
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,158
    LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.
    Just saw this. WTF.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •