No
She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.
Isn't she the chick who railed against the DNC for making it next to impossible to qualify for a debate because of the impossibly high standards of getting 2% in 2 polls?
Even out of the 20+ candidates, she was always in the bottom tear.
No
She got over 2% in like a dozen polls. She was pissed because DNC arbitrarily chooses WHICH polls count and which don't. Without any rhyme or reason.
They listed the polls ahead of time. Its not like she got blindsided, 10 candidates did make the stage- the DNC wasn't rigged against them but her? That's pretty silly tbh. She did qualify for this past debate using similar criteria. The DNC was rigged against her the last time but not this time?
No. They did not list which polls counted and which did not. That's the problem.they also don't post anywhere their criteria of deciding how a poll counts
They did, I remember reading about the polls that the DNC listed back in August and September. She just didn't qualify and blamed the DNC.
For the November debate, the DNC announced the qualifications almost a month ago
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/202...ebate-n1057751
To qualify, candidates will need to hit 3 percent support in at least four early state or national polls that meet the DNC’s methodological requirements, up from 2 percent for the September and October debates.If she doesn't qualify for the November debate, will she rail against the DNC for her not being popular enough to clear 3% in 4 polls? Frankly, it probably should be at least 5% to cut it down to five candidates. Its clearly between Warren, Sanders and Bernie, with the rest of them just hanging around.Gabbard has never hit 3 percent in a qualifying poll.
No no
They listed the qualifying polls after the fact to show who qualified. They did not list them before the polls were taken and they don't have a complete list of which polls 2ould count and which would not. They also again I say, never posted their logic to decide how a poll is valid or not.
That is a big problem as they basically can count or discount polls at will. The DNC is shady as especially since what happened to Bernie last year so they need to be called out.
Tulsi and Yang are the only ones with balls
LOL Hillary claims the Russians are backing Tulsi to run as a third party.
ormer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asserted that the Russians are attempting to undermine the 2020 election by backing Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D., Hawaii) as a third-party candidate, stating “she’s the favorite of the Russians.”
Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Clinton made a number of claims regarding Russian meddling in U.S. elections, including that Gabbard’s substantial social-media support relies on Russian bots. Gabbard was the most-searched candidate after the first and second Democratic debates.
“I think they’ve got their eye on someone who’s currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate,” Clinton said on the podcast. “She’s the favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far.”
lery
She's a vengeful and never forgave Tulsi from not supporting her in 2016
Another reason to love Tulsi
and another reason to be glad Trump won
rcp average has her at 1.2%, behind booker and steyer ...
Hater in the darkroom eyes tightly closed swinging wildly hitting everyone.
Fixed it for ya ma nig
Wasn't that Trump's chance in 2016?
BTW Tulsi is priming herself for 2024. This is just a test run
lol Tulsi doesn't meet Chumps standards
Well, they do seem to like Tulsi. Wouldn't be out of the realm of possibility tbh.
Do you like her pockmarks?
You think they're sexy?
lol
She's pretty good looking otherwise.
She's a good looking women.
Just one last I checked.
tusli's good looking imo
Pretty sure Tulsi is that old debul. She been put up to the task by Satan. She sent to get in the way of Warren, to be a roadblock for her but God won't put more on her plate than she can handle. Warren will lead us to Salvation.
lol only the most perfect woman will do for the forum spellchecker
Relax, it's a joke.
She's a good looking woman with bad skin. It happens.
ST posters getting defensive about a politician's skin.
What about those elbows?
Just saw this. WTF.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)