That's not solid. That is not qualifying.
Pete #3 with a bullet tho.
Tulsi solid in most recent poll
ler
That's not solid. That is not qualifying.
Pete #3 with a bullet tho.
With whom? I only mentioned Tulsi, whose numbers from this poll aren't enough to qualify her for anything, and Pete, whose surge is pretty impressive.
This post is misleading. You could put her on the very bottom and still be at the same 3%. There's no reason to rank her at the top of the 3% getters. She's not solid at all.
Bernie still getting on. This dude is like the ing Ralph Nader of our times.
Nah, Nader was a true progressive with actual progressive accomplishments. The other is a colluding, spineless, poverty pimp who thinks not combing his hair is hip and ironic.
Yeah I mean in terms of his odds of winning the presidency. Basically like Ron Paul.
Disagree. "everyone else at or below 2 %" which means she could not possibly be at the very bottom and still be at 3%
It is solid because she is in the middle of the pack. When months ago, she was literally at the bottom.
good solid run good practice for the real dance in 2024
Make the same list and put her at the bottom of that list though. There's a reason they put her at the very top and it's to try to fool the eye into thinking she's at a higher rank than she is.
I don't think we'll hear about her again. Where is Jill Stein? Where's those other people from the previous election who got about 3%?
Where the is Beto?
huh? shes tied for 5th. The only reason she's listed first is due to the Alphabet
again tied for 5th at 3% is significantly better than her polling at 1% or 2% at the bottom. It's solid
I'm pretty sure we will hear from her again.
Wouldn't calling her "Kagada" be more funny since you're of some kind of Spanish speaking nationality? Doesn't cagada mean " " in Spanish?
Cagala means to , or it out.
Gotcha. Thought the Messicans called it "Cagada". LkrFan, please translate.
Put her at the bottom.
the main difference for Tulsi is that four Republicans voted for her this time around.
More non-Democrats voted for her than Democrats
I'll think about it.... Maybe
you can't refute even one thing I posted.
ad haternem.
"It is okay to disagree and vote against party leadership in the house on specific issues.
To have your own principled stance on something that matters to your state or district.
I can understand that, and respect negotiations.
On the other hand, this rant, filled with Fox News endorsed talking points, is simply disqualifying.
Tulsi Gabbard
✔@TulsiGabbard
Oct 18, 2019
Great! Thank you @HillaryClinton.
You, the queen of warmongers,
embodiment of corruption, and
personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long,
have finally come out from behind the curtain.
From the day I announced my candidacy,
there has been a ...
Ahmed Baba@AhmedBaba_===================
With this unhinged thread alleging the former 2016 Democratic nominee is launching a conspiracy against her,
Tulsi Gabbard confirms she is not seriously running for the Democratic nomination.
Tulsi just confirmed all of the criticisms directed at her.
This is some right-wing BS
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185289626409406464 …
she has taken every turn to
embrace views that could be summed up as “American lives matter, the lives of anyone else don’t.”
Jacobin covered this in a breakdown of the congresswoman.
From 2014 onward, Gabbard appeared regularly on Fox News to lambast the Obama administration for avoiding the phrase (“radical Islam.”)
In one interview, she told the host that “the vast majority of terrorist attacks conducted around the world for over the last decade have been conducted by groups who are fueled by this radical Islamic ideology,”
a statement that may be technically true due to the violence and instability plaguing Middle Eastern countries,
but is wildly misleading considering that non-Muslims make up the vast, vast majority of terrorist perpetrators in both Europe and the United States.
In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo shootings in January 2015,
Gabbard complained on Fox News that by “not using this term ‘Islamic extremism’ and clearly identifying our enemies,”
the administration couldn’t “come up with a very effective strategy to defeat that enemy.”
She told Neil Cavuto that “this isn’t about one specific group,” but about “this radical Islamic ideology that is fueling this,” and that it needed to be defeated “militarily and ideologically.”
She characterized Obama’s refusal to “recognize” the enemy as “mind-boggling” and “troubling.”
Gabbard flirted with joining the Trump administration, taking an interview,
and she also refused to denounce the appointment of Steve Bannon in the Trump administration.
Breitbart, Bannon, and others quickly praised her.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2019/10/18/1893465/-Let-s-get-real-about-Tulsi-Gabbard?detail=emaildkre
Last edited by boutons_deux; 10-21-2019 at 01:13 PM.
Those are not republican talking points
Lol
Jeet Heer pits the kibosh of the "Russian asset" piffle:
https://www.thenation.com/article/cl...tulsi-gabbard/
Hillary's move on TG could be a warning shot, scaring off any 3rd party Russian assets like Moscow-visiting 3rd party Jill Stein who hurt Hillary in 2016.
If TG runs as 3rd party and ends up with lots "dark money" funds, Hillary's "smear" would have been spot on.
Nope, it's cagala. I'll use it in a sentence:
Donald Trump is full of orange cagala
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)