Reply With Quote
Brown and in the US without proof of citizenship. Maybe that's all it takes now.
"Papers, please."
0% chance ducks ever addresses this again
Brown and in the US without proof of citizenship. Maybe that's all it takes now.
"Papers, please."
Trump's zero tolerance policy is deadly.
https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/...icenewstwitterThe man is the seventh person to die in ICE custody since October. At least 25 people have died in ICE custody under the Trump administration, and at least 12 people have died in federal immigration custody — which includes Border Patrol stations and shelters for child migrants, in addition to ICE detention facilities — since September.
For Trash's cult mob, the only good brownie is a dead brownie. They elected Trash to hurt non-white, non-males.
They don't ing care, and Trash once again proves the "pro-life" evangelicals are total frauds, like libertarians.
you're almost there buddy... living on the edge! the spiral-into-psychosis rollercoaster you're on is a sight to witness.
You are a delusional little .
The president can now use appropriated funds for whatever he wants.
Will you defend this when a Dem does it?
Ignoring the hyperbole above ^ I'm wondering if the Omnibus is on the table now?
If you can’t answer you ignore.
Telling.
I engage your trolling at my leisure.
Garland woulda never allowed this. tee, hee.
Biden wants him back.
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/joe-b...212610623.html
Anything to avoid the topic.
They actually didn't rule that at all. They just lifted a stay order until the Ninth Circuit rules on the government appeal.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday gave President Trump a victory in his fight for a wall along the Mexican border by allowing the administration to begin using $2.5 billion in Pentagon money for the construction.
In a 5-to-4 ruling, the court overturned an appellate decision and said that the administration could tap the money while litigation over the matter proceeds. But that will most likely take many months or longer, allowing Mr. Trump to move ahead before the case returns to the Supreme Court after further proceedings in the appeals court.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/u...all-trump.html
"US immigration officials picked up a 9-year-old girl on her way to school — and they detained her for two days."
little girl tortured with psychological abuse, even damage, stress.
"America doesn't torture" -- dubya, aka head's dumb sidekick
Trash's AmeriKKKa
a hypothetical? a what if?
answer now chris! play my make believe games chris!
Why not? He lives in a make-believe world.a hypothetical? a what if?
answer now chris! play my make believe games chris!
seems like you all live in a make believe world tbh...
thats exactly what nono said (although they didnt lift the stay order, they granted a stay order with respect to the injunction. the injunction blocks the state action, and the stay blocks the injunction, effectively)
they haven't made a formal ruling on the merits of whether trump's actions are lawful or not
in the meantime, i'm sure mr small government is ecstatic about the president essentially being able to replace congress in the government's duty to appropriate funds. because he's republican.
Sure thing pal.
lol contradicting yourself in the same sentence
tee hee
correct end result tbh, they allowed the government to proceed while the case is being litigated, as nono said. it was the legal jargon that was off
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
