Reply With Quote
Of course you did. You just supported and made arguments to the opposite conclusion. I don't take you at face value, fattie, it is foolish to do so.
You were pointing out something that you were wrong about. I didn't support banning textbooks. I said so. I can argue a point without needing to enlist to support a movement.
If media sources are biased so that people who think the withdrawal was botched, then how can WH pulled "it was fine" from the same media sources? Still waiting on the answer to that. Do you need to use a lifeline?
Of course you did. You just supported and made arguments to the opposite conclusion. I don't take you at face value, fattie, it is foolish to do so.
misinformed self-centered asshole creates narrative as a recovery tool
You've been trying to recover she she lost.
If you want me to post your arguments from the thread to support what I am saying I can. The rest is just weak ass deflection. Try harder or last word is yours. I've made my point I feel.
You've been trying to recover she she lost.
I didn't drink my dinner from the newspaper spoon but you did and that's your argument against me?
You're most welcome to it, tbh. I took the objective information and drew my own conclusion, you parroting the headline.
Viva la difference.
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-15-2022 at 02:22 AM.
Fuzzy not clear on things, creates a narrative, claims he could support it if needed (all while not being prompted to even pipe up) and then claims he's proven his point.
Basic hubris101
You said you used the same news sources everyone else uses. Explain how you saw "it was fine" when others didn't. What Wild Cobra like "snap" happened in that gourd of yours to indicate the "botched" claims you were reading were bull and then how you were able to discern the withdrawal was fine. I've only challenged you with this obvious, next logical step half a dozen times and you've just floundered around trying to avoid admitting you just pulled that from your ass.
That's a hashtag, dude.oh yeah, #txlege is a real impartial source
Apparently where whinehole gets his talking points for the day
L
how lame
yep
more family separations and kids in cages
The evacuation was of large scale and expeditious. I don't really see how it's Joe Biden's fault marines died. Can you fill in the causal links? 1,000 talking heads saying botched doesn't move the needle for me, that's editorial, not factual as far as I can tell.
Were a bunch of Americans left behind? Are you sore we didn't let more Afghans emigrate? What exactly is your gripe?
Way more noise was made by right wingers about the 13 marines that died at the end than the thousands killed and maimed during the last 20 years of failed nation building. The outrage seems not totally sincere.
DHS anticipates an average of 441 unaccompanied children per day at border this year, a new record
Repugs could impeach/convict Biden for the Afghan evacuation.
They don't really care what the "crime" was
because they could the votes to do whatever they want, esp in the House, Repug SCOTUS6 will not intervene.
Maybe the problem isn't too much immigration but too little.
Lazy good for nothing immigrants contributing nothing and being a drain on our economy
in your own words?
Joe was the only one who had the stones to end it and he did. Mission accomplished, we're much better off for it. Whiners gonna whine.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
