People talking about the suppossed glass body of a man that played professional basketball from age 18 to 40.
He had plenty of chances to do that and was too big a pussy to try
People talking about the suppossed glass body of a man that played professional basketball from age 18 to 40.
Oh ok, so you can say "he could've had 3 rings if he just didn't choke in 06 and 07" as if those chokes don't actually detract from his legacy not add to it but I can't bring up Manu's foul or else it's hate?
Uh, let's see Scottie was 3rd in MVP voting in 93-94. Led the Bulls to the 3rd seed. But yeah, let's just ignore that. Real objective.2. Scottie definitely was not an MVP level player in '94-'95 season. During that year he put up great numbers but could not lead the bulls to playing above .500 basketball. Things were so bad that the bulls were below .500 when MJ came back with about 20 some games left. But then again that's probably type of record Manu would lead his team to if he didn't have the luxury of playing with Duncan.
Yeah, Manu would have led a sub .500 team without prime Duncan. Just like he did in the Olympics? Or when TD first started his decline, before he lost all the weight and transformed himself into a great role player? Right?
Who told you Jimmy Butler is a better two way player than Durbeta? Butler isn't even a tier one guy. He's like a third tier star. Stop with the dumb comparisons.3. at the 2 way player bs argument. Jimmy Butler is a much better 2 way player than Durant but nobody would be stupid to say he's better than Durant. Going by your logic Butler is better than both Curry and Durant.
Sure, it was a nice accomplishment but don't be dramatic about it. As a Spurs fan, I'm not going to stand here and act like the Lakers team that the Spurs beat in '03 didn't fall off some from the dominant ass '01 team. Why are you trying so hard to prop up Dirk?
Dude, they were an 8th seed in 2010. 4th seed in 2011. 2nd seed and eventual Western Conference champs in 2012. Their big three+Abaka were still young. It's common sense that they were still developing. Were the Warriors we beat in 2013 the same monsters they ended up becoming in 2015? Of course not. Don't be dumb.3. OKC in '11 was as good as they were in '12. The only difference was Dirk straight up annihilated them by averaging 32.2 points on 55 percent shooting. The Spurs incarnation from '11-'14 didn't have anybody that could straight up put up the numbers Dirk did against them. It took a team effort to beat them in '14 lead by Duncan-Manu-#2. But none of those 3 guys were as dominant as Dirk was against them in '11.
Oh man, the irony
Imagine comparing roleplayers coming off the bench to franchise players
Lou Williams v Manu should be the topic of this thread tbh.
This notion that Manu was some Anthony Davis-esque china doll is false. The dude played year around for like 15 years and ended up playing+being a net positive player past 40. You don't do that by being a fragile china doll. Yeah, he doesn't make it past 40 if he carries the load of a #1 for all those years (or if he does he looks just as done as Dirk did the past few years)...but he has a dominant 8-10 year run with plenty of individual accolades during his prime.
Agreed, he’s have broken his foot 10 games in
Get back to me when Butler closes for 4 le teams and countless other elite, non- le teams. Or when he leads a bunch of Prigionis to gold.
The thing is if I say "well Manu has 4 rings, Dirk only has 1" the first thing someone will bring up is cir stances. Manu had Duncan, etc. Which is fair but if you say "Dirk's individual accolades trump Manu's" why can't I point to cir stances as well? Team success wise having Duncan helped Manu but individually it hurt him. That's just logical.
It really is baffling that folks are so obtuse that can't see Manu had all the tools to be a number one guy on the NBA. , he was Indeed the number one option for the Spurs in multiple seasons, folks just want to ignore that fact for some reason.
If Harden wasn't traded, he would still be averaging 16 ppg and people would think Westbrook is on a superior tier than him.
ifs and buts
Amazing that Spurs fans will on Duncan’s legacy just to win a re ed Manu argument.
He averaged 25 minutes a game (mostly agains the other teams 2nd unit), of course he played into his 40s.
Duncan is the GOAT PF, player of his generation, and Top 5 player ever. Try again bruh.
And played international ball during the Summers for how many years? Add those minutes+all those playoff minutes courtesy of all the deep playoff runs and his minutes per year were probably more than Dirk.
Manu in his prime on today's NBA would be a top 5 player in the league, tbh.
Probably or were? Cmon Juan, provide some actual numbers to back up that claim.
More what ifs and hypotheticals.
Manu is one of the greatest basketball players of all time. No ifs or hypotheticals.
Sure no ifs or hypotheticals, just opinions involving vague and non-descript adjectives.
Please define what that means and provide facts that shows when was the "number one option" for the Spurs. I see that Manu never led the team in scoring in any of his seasons. First, you had Duncan as the obvious alpha for so long, then Parker bridges the gap and is the leading scorer until Kawhi comes along and fills the alpha role.
, out of all four of those guys all of them but Manu got to be the lead dog for atleast a season. Manu was literally a Robin his whole career
4 NBA championships and 1 Olympic gold as a top player of his teams. There really aren't much clearer non vague criterias than that, tbh.
Wasn’t the top player on any of the 4 NBA championships. Fake news, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)