Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59
  1. #26
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    TSA roots for criminals. My goodness.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,973
    LOL djohn tryna get cred back.

  3. #28
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    LOL djohn tryna get cred back.
    Espionage. Called it. It would be on the table for anyone associated with Wikileaks.

  4. #29
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    20,548
    LOL djohn tryna get cred back.
    poor fella thought this had something to do with the election

  5. #30
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    poor fella thought this had something to do with the election
    These indictments have something to do with getting people killed. Surely you don’t think Assange won’t talk so he won’t serve 170 years?

  6. #31
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    What’s something he might try to do for a lighter sentence if convicted?

  7. #32
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    Btw. Who said he wouldn’t be charged separately? these charges are separate from the last ones

  8. #33
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    43,429
    Why?

    For the simple fact you like to root for the enemy or is there something more behind your support?

  9. #34
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    9,877
    poor fella thought this had something to do with the election
    You want to go on record here - and say that Assange

    will NEVER get more indictments based on the election?

  10. #35
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    20,548
    You want to go on record here - and say that Assange

    will NEVER get more indictments based on the election?
    What do possible future indictments based on the election have to do with djohn thinking these indictments were based on the election?

  11. #36
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    20,548
    Why?

    For the simple fact you like to root for the enemy or is there something more behind your support?
    Tried to find a dunced down thread for you


  12. #37
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,146
    Tried to find a dunced down thread for you

    And does the press ever inform the government that they are going with the story, give us a reason to hold back?

    answer: yes

    Has the press in the US ever held back stories based on the response of the government as to why it should not be published?

    answer: yes

  13. #38
    wrong about pizzagate TSA's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    20,548
    And does the press ever inform the government that they are going with the story, give us a reason to hold back?

    answer: yes

    Has the press in the US ever held back stories based on the response of the government as to why it should not be published?

    answer: yes

  14. #39
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    38,146
    That particular article covers a minuscule amount of what was released.
    Wiki leaks did absolutely NOT have people under their employ who actually understand the nature of US relationships with other countries.

    This is why the government does lend an ear to real news organizations. Not bulk release stolen data decided by one individual.

  15. #40
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276

  16. #41
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,421
    the indictment makes clear Assange is charged with helping to steal the info, including hacking passwords. That is not covered by the 1st Amendment
    did you read the indictment?


  17. #42
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    did you read the indictment?

    I did. Did you? Because that’s exactly what happens

  18. #43
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276

  19. #44
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,421
    Under the DOJ's theory, receiving and publishing classified material is prosecutable as espionage. Journos aren't wrong to be concerned.

    Lol passing off other people's tweets -- verbatim --as your own take.
    Last edited by Winehole23; 05-24-2019 at 12:04 AM.

  20. #45
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    Under the DOJ's theory, receiving and publishing classified material is prosecutable as espionage. Journos aren't wrong to be concerned.

    Lol passing off other people's tweets as your own takes.
    Except Assange is and never was a journalist. Unless they instructed and assisted in the hacking of classified material they really have no business being concerned

  21. #46
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    Good to see djohn still alive

  22. #47
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,421
    Assange doesn't have to be a "real" journalist to have 1st Amendment protections,

    Fwiw, the Obama DOJ considered prosecuting Assange under the Espionage Act but declined to do so because they could see no way to do it that wouldn't put legit journalists at risk.

  23. #48
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Rockets
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    37,276
    Assange doesn't have to be a "real" journalist to have 1st Amendment protections,

    Fwiw, the Obama DOJ considered prosecuting Assange under the Espionage Act but declined to do so because they could see no way to do it that wouldn't put legit journalists at risk.
    In this case, assisting a hostile adversary to harm US national security doesn’t get him 1st amendment protections. And yes The Obama administration considered it.

  24. #49
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,421
    Face it: Trump is prosecuting Assange for showing up the USG and US Armed forces as liars and war criminals during the Iraq War.

    If he succeeds, hard to imagine he wouldn't sic Barr on the fake news media next.

  25. #50
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,144
    the indictment makes clear Assange is charged with helping to steal the info, including hacking passwords.
    Where does it say this? Other than the tweet you copied.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •