Blame it on whatever you want, it's been one of the worst moves in recent history..
Stevens force-feeding him was arguably even worse than Kyrie's issues..
Blame it on whatever you want, it's been one of the worst moves in recent history..
Stevens force-feeding him was arguably even worse than Kyrie's issues..
Not as talented as Kyrie but will play hard every possession and help his teammates get better. Celtics now need to replace Hortford, Rozier, and Morris.
No. It's one of the worst outcomes. For all we know, the move was great in and of itself.
Smartest move the Hornets have made in a while was not maxing him. What would be even better would be getting something for him in a sign-and-trade.
Agreed everyone makes excuses because we feel bad for Hayward and or overrated Stevens like I did...
Dude was a rich man's Chandler Parsons (pre injury for both guys)... That is not worth a max to the Celts when u building a le contender with all the picks Ainge had...
Kemba is a nice signing but to me forcing Tatum to be secondary playmaker was what was best in the long run... If he is the blue chip prospect I think he was why have Kemba and Hayward (its, only thing Hayward still does well) block his development? If he just gonna be a mid range scorer/spot up shooter... should have traded him for Kawhi or AD
Harlem thanking the voodoo dolls to help him with his racist theories.
Time to add more chicken blood to the brew.
Boston's situation really shows how difficult team building can be. Trading Kyrie for IT was a good move, but how could they have known there'd be chemistry problems with the young guys? Hayward was the best of the second tier SFs, and suffered a gruesome injury five minutes into his first game. Sometimes basketball is like poker, where you can go all in on a bet you have a 75% chance of winning, but you still lose.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)