Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 95 of 95
  1. #76
    Go Spurs Go!! dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    19,442
    thatís why I said federer played inthe weak era because his only rival are roddick and Hewitt..haha

    thatís the reason why federer has 20 slams.. he won 10 of those from the weak era 2003 to 2007
    And you still have not given me any context whatsoever to prove your point. Nothing. By the numbers heís the greatest player that ever lived. Iíve asked you 10 times to give me some sort of historical context and you still wonít do it. Because you canít.

  2. #77
    Veteran skin27's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,004
    [QUOTE=dbreiden83080;9920411]And you still have not given me any context whatsoever to prove your point. Nothing. By the numbers he’s the greatest player that ever lived.[/QUOTE


    You just can’t answer this argument..haha
    _____________________________

  3. #78
    Go Spurs Go!! dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    19,442
    [QUOTE=skin27;9920414]
    And you still have not given me any context whatsoever to prove your point. Nothing. By the numbers he’s the greatest player that ever lived.[/QUOTE


    You just can’t answer this argument..haha
    You don’t answer an argument moron you answer a question LOL. Which I did like 10 times. You still have not answered my question? Still.

  4. #79
    Veteran skin27's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,004
    [QUOTE=dbreiden83080;9920415]

    You don’t answer an argument moron you answer a question LOL. Which I did like 10 times. You still have not answered my question? Still.
    See? You can’t accept that federer has 20 slams because he played in the weak era 2003-2007..

  5. #80
    Go Spurs Go!! dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    19,442
    [QUOTE=skin27;9920416]

    See? You can’t accept that federer has 20 slams because he played in the weak era 2003-2007..
    Weak by what standard? That the other two greatest players in the history of tennis were not all in their primes at the same time? That’s the context. That’s some weak ass bullshit.

  6. #81
    Veteran skin27's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    2,004
    [QUOTE=dbreiden83080;9920417]

    Weak by what standard? That the other two greatest players in the history of tennis were not all in their primes at the same time? That’s the context. That’s some weak ass bullshit.

    federer is lucky to play in the weak era where there is no competition..accept it boy..haha

  7. #82
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,923
    I think Federer is still GOAT at this moment but I could see Djokovic above Nadal. Of the 3 the media is far less in Djokovic's corner.
    _____________________________
    https://i.imgur.com/dDE00Yd.jpg

  8. #83
    Go Spurs Go!! dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    19,442

    federer is lucky to play in the weak era where there is no competition..accept it boy..haha
    Pete was lucky to play in an era where Andre cared more about shooting camera commercials, eating Fast Food, and dating celebs than playing tennis..

    McEnroe was lucky his top rival Borg quit at 25 years old.

    Novak is lucky he won majors with Nadal being injured and Fed getting old..

    Context Son..
    Last edited by dbreiden83080; 2 Weeks Ago at 09:42 AM.

  9. #84
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    31,826
    I think Federer is still GOAT at this moment but I could see Djokovic above Nadal. Of the 3 the media is far less in Djokovic's corner.
    Odd comment.

    Thinks Federer is the goat but thinks Nadal is behind Djokovic.

    Djokovic has not the titles nor intensity to match Nadal. Nadal is about to pull within one major title to tie Federer for most all time IN LESS TIME.

  10. #85
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    36,998

    See? You canít accept that federer has 20 slams because he played in the weak era 2003-2007..
    Dude, your "2003-2007 era is weak" take is dumb as shit. If you are going to say dumb shit, back it up. If you can't, just shut the up.
    _____________________________
    Top 5 SG of all-time

    Win Shares/48

    1-Jordan - .250
    2-West - .213
    3-Ginobili - .190

    BPM

    1-Jordan - 8.09
    2-Drexler - 5.98
    3-Ginobili - 4.95

    Championships

    1-Jordan - 6
    2-Bryant - 5
    3-Ginobili - 4



  11. #86
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    36,998
    Roddick, Hewitt and Safin would have like 10 Grand Slams each if it wasn't for Federer. "Weak era"

  12. #87
    LONG LIVE THE CHIEF lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    89,776
    WETHENORTH

  13. #88
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    31,826
    ESPN

    They had a cute little Serena had a baby video all cue up to go. Tennis is a young man's (Women's) game. Serena could not keep up.

  14. #89
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    31,826
    You get 3.6 million dollars as the prize money? Holy shit

  15. #90
    LONG LIVE THE CHIEF lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    89,776
    You get 3.6 million dollars as the prize money? Holy shit
    Is it too late to learn tennis?

  16. #91
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    7,830
    You mean Nadal?

    He's coming for Fed, and he's getting some separation from Djoker. When you consider he's guaranteed to win the French every year, he's probably good for 3 more of those. And with today's win, he also won the most US Opens of this decade with 4 (Djoker had 3).

  17. #92
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    31,826
    You mean Nadal?

    He's coming for Fed, and he's getting some separation from Djoker. When you consider he's guaranteed to win the French every year, he's probably good for 3 more of those. And with today's win, he also won the most US Opens of this decade with 4 (Djoker had 3).
    FrostKing

  18. #93
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    31,826
    Also women wanting equal pay when they cant even give us 3 ing sets of excitement. This, this was a ing match. That's how you end a tournament!

  19. #94
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    Chicago Bulls
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    3,923
    Haha. My tennis knowledge is shallow. I just prefer Djokovic because he's slavic

  20. #95
    Go Spurs Go!! dbreiden83080's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    19,442
    You mean Nadal?

    He's coming for Fed, and he's getting some separation from Djoker. When you consider he's guaranteed to win the French every year, he's probably good for 3 more of those. And with today's win, he also won the most US Opens of this decade with 4 (Djoker had 3).
    The US Open finals makes me think some of these young guys are finally coming. Thiem has been in the French Open Finals 2 years in a row.. Nadal also has injuries that come and go. Next year will be interesting.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •