Reply With Quote
You always get that wrong.
...when somebody sneezed.
You always get that wrong.
If you don’t stop with this stupidity, he will win again 2020.
Come to terms that basically half the voting public voted FOR the orange haze.
Ask Why. And then go from there if you want him out.
Nahhh... He has probably already done himself in. But for the sake of the country think.
Half the voting public liked this man enough for him to be president. A wannabe business flunky who became an entertainer and learned how to spread his name. Think about that. People I know that are basically kind and civil and would do anything for anybody voted for this idiot. They are not reveling in it like Thread. But you and Boots want them to.
Which brings up another enigma. One of the most polite, articulate posters on this board “worked” for this guy.
Thread. So I clearly have to adjust my thinking to try and understand the fury.
I know, it's a childhood memory of an old television celebrity (Ghoulardi) who weekly hosted horror films in Cleveland. He'd sing it like this.
- "Kind words, Ethan. Thank ya, kindly."
- "Old Mose" - "The Searchers"
Respectfully; I take all your points and understand what you are saying and where you are coming from.
However - I think you are still refusing to see what is right in front of your face and are trying to use conventional rationalization to a NEW dire existential threat in our democracy.
I would not say what I say without understanding what DJT is , where he came from and how he stole the presidency.
The evidence is there. He won 3 states by a combined 70,000 votes. 3 states - that Manafort and Gates - provided the polling data to the russians. 3 states where the RUSSIANS stole the ENTIRE democrat (HRC Campaign) STRATEGY and provided it to the Trump campaign. 3 states where the Russians told the Trump campaign that there was no chance HRC would make any extra visits - so Trump pounced on that - went there often and when the election was stolen - trump and his cohorts - immediately had a response: "the russians didn't force HRC to avoid going to Michigan!"
Think about that.
You are in the Super Bowl - and you are provided the ENTIRE opponents playbook. Their injury status, the scrimmage videos and their trick plays on film by a spy. Sure, you still have to compete and try to win - but you already have a great advantage and you also know which plays give YOU the best chance to succeed - based on the middle linebackers pain when he goes to his left and the trick play is used by the opponent whenever they go into a certain formation and you can call the defense appropriately.
This is a criminal president who stood in Helsinki - after a two hour secret meeting - on the day that Mueller indicted over a dozen Russians - and the Russian internet agency -
and took the side of Russia and betrayed the USA intel agencies and stated that it was all a hoax.
This is a FRACTION of what this criminal has done and I will spare you the rest of the high crimes and treasonous behavior.
So you want me to "think" and politely bend over for the ing lunatics who are so brainwashed that they witnessed with their own eyes and ears -
Trump publicly betraying the country in Helsinki - and STILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND HIM?
NO.
You have it all wrong. I don't recognize this traitor criminal as a legitimate president. He is a criminal who stole the office and the crime here -
is that so many Americans like you and the media -
LEGITIMIZED this fraud criminal.
Right in front of our eyes. The Mueller report showed the evidence.
Yet
here we are
PRETENDING
that he is a legit president?
Never.
History will prove me right.
History will show that the con man and Russia - not only - pulled the wool over the eyes of his adoring cult -
but they also had their detractors and opponents in a corner - trembling with fear of
"his base"
that nonsense.
Stop shaking in your boots and start defending this country before they steal the next election.
You conveniently leave out the last election/'18 because you won. I suppose Russia took that one off, but, will be back on the beam in '20.
The same people he disagreed with in Helsinki are the same SOB's who met him at the door with that Steele dossier accusing him of getting pissed on by Russian chicks. That wasn't done as any sanctioned briefing. That was done with CNN/Media at the ready to embarrass the President & to punish him for slabbing & tagging Hillary Clinton.
You only wanted to save the Democracy when you couldn't destroy any longer.
, boy, you can't take 4 years off before you get your ass back in there to Lord it over all creation once & again?
You got whooped.
It happens.
stfu traitor
funny how your traitor idol uses
”they hate America”
when it is traitors like you and he who are betraying the country
go yourself
Don't start up, Homer. & calm the down. You've been on the perpetual rag since I came back on these Boards.
Love always,
- Cubby
open your eyes culbear
what is it in you that
leaves truth at the door
when you pledge allegiance to a criminal?
what made you defend sexual assault/violent rape
when Kobe was your object of worship?
what compels you to defend treason and high crimes against humans and against the usa
when you die on the hill of this disgusting criminal?
examine your motives and shine the light on what truth and integrity is
before you discard it all and perform mental gymnastics to
”win”
It takes more than Russia interfering to get about half the vote.
Why cant you understand that this was a close election and could have gone either way?
It is ABSOLUTELY significant that this could have gone either way. Many people wanted Trump as president.
A significant portion of the public. OUR voting public. Now if you have decided that half the voting public is just crazy and we need to split the Union, I would get that conclusion even though I think it has a false premise, But I could abide that explanation. I know what you want.
But to say the election was stolen (and what we have seen from our investigations and through the reliable press is that nothing indicates Russian interference was THE difference. Nothing)
so
This was close.
It was close because Russia.
Russia put Donald over the top.
No. Just No.
It wasn't violent rape. Rape, yes, but, not violent. She wanted it. Then she figured she could get a check out of it.
& "win" is my , Homer. Do not try & co-opt it. I brought "win" with me when I returned.
I DO get that many people voted trump/ I get that part
but it was the perfect storm of
russian interference
trump team accepting help
russian disinformation helped many voters AVOID the voting booth
russian fueled slander/propaganda against hrc
hrc also being ty
racism and white supremacy dog whistling
polling data/dem strategy being leaked/shared with russians
trump porn star/pussy grabbing fallout MINIMIZED by wiki/Russia releasing hacked emails within 30 minutes of trumps ery being exposed and by nat’l enquirer covering up the porn star payoffs
50 states voting machines penetrated by Russians (until now we have been told that no votes were changed and we should believe that? NO!!)
you can continue to believe Russia did not swing the election
all the evidence and trumps behavior at Helsinki and up to today suggest the obvious
goddamn right Russia installed him and goddamn right trump is fully aware of this
it is blatantly obvious to anyone taking all the evidence we have and the mueller report and mueller testimony
question is:
why would any aware person with all this evidence in plain sight STILL not believe the election was stolen?
Oh the non violent rape. Well that's okay then.
Don't be obtuse, Blake. You know whence I speak.
No I don't. It's either consensual or it's rape. There's no middle ground.
Bend over. I'll show you a middle in' ground.
No.
If you still try it's rape.
Pretty simple.
Good info, mono!
Well, looks like it's white American month in El Paso now.
You lucked out, Pav's.
Just playing the odds.
Odds it wasn't a white incel were close to nil.
Well, you sittin' there with fingers & toes & at default eyes crossed didn't help.
Congratulations, Pav's.
So if the Russians had not interfered, what would the count in the electoral college have been and how wide a margin would the popular vote have been?
S Homer?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
