Reply With Quote
My Venezuelan folks keep telling me that This Trump’s administration is running the country the same way Hugo Chavez was running it in the 90’s.
Give one example of "dems" taking your gun. One
My Venezuelan folks keep telling me that This Trump’s administration is running the country the same way Hugo Chavez was running it in the 90’s.
This is what the Cubans tell me - the sequence of events leading to their former countries. The original comparison (not from me) was Trump similar to Chavez. Are you saying that Trump goes after guns more than the Dems. Seems a pretty clear choice to them - on one side more regulation, more of your money, more control vs the opposite.
Not saying anything either way.
But since you brought it up, republicans like to bring this non existent talking point for their benefit without actually pointing out to the facts or to an instance of a democrat actually showing up to your house to take said guns.
thinking your yard sign and ty bumper sticker are indicators for anything
That’s at least an improvement over a few months ago when she said that bad traffic and long lines Pollo Tropical were economic indicators that Trump was in great shape for re-election.
this Iowa debate is a joke. Hopefully two equally ty performance means advantage goes to the challenger and not the in bent. Every answer from both candidates starts with "This issue is really important to me"
Joe said he's sending Beto to do it if elected
Nice. At least you’ll get a beer out of that rough deal.
Greenfield is that ty?
They're both awful, the moderators are horrible too.
Ernst is worse on the actual issues (healthcare is definitely going to be a real problem for every Republican Senator this year), but Greenfield's delivery is terrible and she can't answer questions directly (and she's not particularly good at ignoring the question either)
Trump made bump stocks illegal, which is more than Obama ever did to gun owners.
Greenfield might be the de facto winner of that debate after Ernst's crazy abortion fear mongering at the end.
Holy the senate is one ed up place if this is the best middle America has to offer.
unless people like the crazy abortion stuff
Iowa has a pro choice majority, albeit not very large.
https://www.pewforum.org/religious-l...tion/by/state/
Sums up the modern Republican party.
Down 3 to Biden in Georgia with Ossoff up 1 on Purdue
Warnock finally emerging as the Dem candidate in Georgia's special election, so it at least goes to a run-off
Statistical tie for presidential race in NC, but Cunningham up 6 on Thillis
yeah but what's their participation rate? and is the abortion fear mongering going to rile up the pro-life crowd to go vote in bigger numbers, etc
Ernst also said during the debate she thinks there's almost no chance Roe v. Wade ever gets overturned, so she was kinda talking out of both ends of her mouth. I don't think she had a direct strategy of trying to turn out the pro life vote.
the "radical abortionists" point was about having no limitations or restrictions, not specifically about banning it outright
Kansas electing a Democratic Governor and potentially a Dem senator is why Democrats shouldn't be worried about nuking the filibuster - any future scenario where the Republican party has unchecked authority to pass legislation without a Democratic filibuster to stop them would shift the country to the left the same way Brownbackonomics have shifted Kansas to the left. In <4 years they'd pass a flat tax with all kinds of oligarch friendly loophole and would then be gutting all public services and safety nets after their tax cuts didn't "pay for themselves".
Why does your party have such ty candidates?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
