Reply With Quote
NRA, BigCarbon, BigPharma, BigFinance, BigInsurance, BigRE, the 1%, etc all disagree and laugh at BS's BS.
NRA, BigCarbon, BigPharma, BigFinance, BigInsurance, BigRE, the 1%, etc all disagree and laugh at BS's BS.
Ben Shapiro thinks money in politics is good. He supports every war. He is against net neutrality. He is a Zionist Jew, a neocon.
Makes me laugh when he says "good jew" "bad jew"
Apperently your political affiliations is what makes you either a good jew or a bad jew
Yea, cos he's the one shining the spotlight on the corruption, dip .
Logic Man Ben Shapiro DESTROYS Full Time WORKERS Living In POVERTY
"If the system happens over most of them..."
It doesn't. We'll revisit this when it does.
We had the option of choosing between an orange narcissist buffoon man child an a known corrupt Zionist war criminal in Killary Clinton. Then Bernie Sanders got cheated by the DNC. There. That's your sign that the system has ed them over.
Campaign donations aren't big bags of money labelled "BRIBE", but they can have a similar effect.
Only in America is money accorded free speech rights.
DarrinS your news source "Reason" agrees with Ben Shapiro. Take notes...
Are you kidding? DarrinS doesn't even read past the headline in his own threads. So many self-pwns going that route.
Like boutons, he just spams us with his chain mail and headlines from his go tos.
Blakehole whining about spam.
Hardly.
Ok, where else?
The relevant case in the US is Buckley vs. Valeo.
I'll give you this, you're more of a straight troll than a spammer.
Point of clarification: how do you define spam?
There are restrictions on money in the political arena, thanks to your heroes.
Tweets and articles that trigger you. Lots of spam here.
Not sure what you're referring to, can you be more specific?
Oh, you define spam by the response that it gets. A most unusual definition, but it's totally like you to have an idiosyncratic gloss.
I forgot the blue font. Sorry.
Oh, so you don't have a definition.
Cool, another Derp fold.
BigDonor money bags are PRECISELY, RELIABLY goddamn bribes.
Politics is greased with money, $Bs of it.
Politicians know if they take a bribe and don't deliver, that BigDonor will primary/bribe an opponent.
The ROI of BigDonor bribes is in the 100x, if not 1000x.
Esp with the Repugs, but as well with Dems, voters preferences are almost never implemented (aka disenfranchisement), and ONLY if voter preferences don't reduce BigDonor income.
tee, hee.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
