What's the Republican health care plan?
What's the Republican health care plan?
Solid sperm shielding. Deflect right off.
derp folds
Is this thread about Republicans having the answers?
Yes or no.
Since you admit they have no answers, how could it be about their having the answers?
lol derp
Way to admit you're sperm shielding.
I've said before that Obamacare doesn't do anything to control costs.
Now what?
What do you want your government to do about it?
Yet you still needed to sperm shield for it.
Nope.
I just repeated what I think about Obamacare.
Now what do you want your Trump to do about it?
No, you just want to?
You stated a point on Obamacare; nothing has been repeated in this thread.
I read about it a few days ago. This is what the lack of cost control looks like. Medical tourism has been a thing for a long time now and it’s just a symptom of a larger problem. Obamacare was certainly a missed opportunity to address it, tbh.
That wording almost gives it the appearance of a good-faith effort. Everyone knows it was a scam.
Derp folds.
Forever.
lol derp
What's the scam, derp?
Tell everyone everything you know about the scam!
Medicare for all isn’t the answer. It will just make things less efficient than what it is now.
Mitt Romney Finally Takes Credit For Obamacare
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallp...-for-obamacare
Compulsory funneling of everyone's money based on vague promises. This isn't hard, sperm shield chump.
After a backlash Thursday, Romney tried to walk that line again, posting on Facebook that he still opposes Obamacare because "it has failed," "drove up premiums" and "took insurance away from people":
It was a bad law that improved over the previous system, but nowhere far enough.
That said, it’s difficult enough to pass health legislation, tbh, that’s why I said missed opportunity...
Absolutely not.
If you go back ten years in this forum, you'll find El Nono and others were saying exactly the same thing: the ACA wasn't designed to control costs and wouldn't deliver affordable health care.
El Nono said it was ty at the time; so did I.
It contributed to a decreased rate of growth of healthcare costs and got more people insured.
By those two metrics it was a modest improvement over the status quo ante.
It was good for those that had preexisting conditions and would otherwise be denied coverage but for the not so sick or the ones who didn't want insurance they got screwed with higher costs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)