Wouldn't make sense to do it before Aramco IPO
wut
You said marching orders.
What were YOU talking about?
Step up or back the down again.
Wouldn't make sense to do it before Aramco IPO
I didn't say a damn thing about the Saudi oil fields.
Chump walking back his conspiracy theory like a .
That's why I used a question mark, genius. yYour post made little sense. I'm just going to assume you didn't read any of the preceding posts.
So what were you talking about?
Step up or fold.
You used the question mark so that you could say your conspiracy theory wasn't set in stone. You were too much of a to put yourself out there.
OK, what are you saying was my conspiracy theory?
Step up or back the down again.
You're going to fold.
That's what I'm asking you. You clearly believe something may have happened in regards to Trump and/or Bolton's role in the burning to the Saudi oil fields.
How do you glean that from my question to you?
Here are the three posts in a row:
Again. What marching orders?
Step up or back the down.
Chump talking about gleaning when I didn't step anywhere near the topic of the burning Saudi oil fields.
But this the point of your soft conspiracy theories. You can just step back and try to pretend like you aren't a .
1 hour 45 minutes we find out what the market thinks.
Derp backs the down again.The post right above yours was the attack on the oil fields. That's why I asked you what you were talking about
What possible conspiracy theory are you getting from this:But this the point of your soft conspiracy theories. You can just step back and try to pretend like you aren't a .
Again, step up or back the down again.
Can't. Our refineries, well pretty much everyone's refineries, weren't designed to process the light crude we are producing all by itself. So they mix light and heavy crude to keep it within the parameters of the refineries. That's why we are importing oil and exporting oil.
That's an awful long time to declassify a picture or two. Maybe they can just give it to the prez along with some sharpies and he can do the declassification on the twitters
I mean, again, pure speculation. But this makes their product twice as valuable, and realistically the terror threat is always there in that part of the world.
And it's oil, it's not like the crop will rot on the vine.
Well what?
Missiles not drones
Says Mohamed bin Khalid?
I'm not dismissing the possibility, but rando twitter is garbage.
Our drones attack with missiles, so I'm not sure what is being claimed.
https://www.lse.co.uk/news/wrapup-2-...6xc268ecz.htmlEvidence from Saudi oil attack points to Iran, not Yemen -U.S. official
WASHINGTON/DUBAI, Sept 15 (Reuters) - The attack on Saudi Arabia's oil facilities on Saturday that has threatened global oil supplies came from a direction indicating that Iran was behind it, and cruise missiles may have been the weapon of choice, according to a senior U.S. official.
The comments added heft to Washington’s accusation that Iran launched the attacks that knocked out more than 5% of global oil supply, instead of the Yemeni Houthi group that claimed it. Tehran rejected the accusation, but said it was ready for war.
The strike on the heartland of Saudi Arabia's oil industry, which included damage to the world's biggest petroleum-processing facility, was expected to send oil prices up $5 to $10 per barrel on Monday and inflame tensions across the Middle East.
The U.S. official, who asked not to be named, said on Sunday there were 19 points of impact in the attack on Saudi facilities and that evidence showed the launch area was west-northwest of the targets - the direction of Iraq and Iran - not south from Yemen.
The official added that Saudi officials indicated they had seen signs that cruise missiles were used in the attack, which is inconsistent with the Iran-aligned Houthi group’s claim that it conducted the attack with 10 drones.
"There's no doubt that Iran is responsible for this. No matter how you slice it, there's no escaping it. There's no other candidate," the official told reporters.
yeah, now the 'unofficial word' is Iraq or Iran.
I mean, I won't rule out anything, but if there's such clear evidence, what's taking so long for an official word on the matter, and putting such evidence forward?
I get that the Saudis in general have zero credibility (and the US to an extent after the whole Khashoggi murder), which makes the whole thing more complicated.
We know what TheGreatYatch thinks anyways
thanks for the info bud.
well duh... it's always those pesky meddling zionists!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)