They're either completely ignorant or ting their pants at the thought of being honest.
It's just possible history isn't dichromatic.
They're either completely ignorant or ting their pants at the thought of being honest.
When thesaurus use goes wrong.
Nah, check the first definition.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dichromatic
When pedantry goes wrong
You must be the death of any party.
Darrin's ratio of instant self-owns remains at the remarkably high level it was 10 years ago when I joined this board. Only Spurtacular and Wild Cobra come anywhere close, IMO.
You beefed.
How will I go on?
Self-owning your way through threads, as you so reliably do.
We should expect the Iranians to act in good faith, per history.
That's all I got.
Why was there a revolution, Pavlov?
Figures.
The same thing must be asked daily by Iranians on their forums tbqh.
USA is way more sketchy than Iran.
Ignorant Americans thinking complete surrender by countries like Iran or NK Isa possibility
Wake the up and smell the kebob. Iran nor NK will surrender to US demands. They will fight to the death.
The sooner arrogant Americans realize this the better. Starting with the big ol orange with hair sitting in the Monika Lewinsky oral observatory
Ditto the USA
ameridumbs thinking their country acts in good faith
Anybody forgetting the history of USA/CIA overthrowing, always spreading freedom and democracy for BigOil, democratically elected Mossadegh in 1953 so the pro-West Shah could be an oppressive, murderous dictator until Khomeini's revolution?
There's no reason for Iran to trust the USA, esp under a unstable, bull ting, sick freak like Trash.
Yeah.
And the Russian and Chinese forums.
They all talk about it freely.
Hater, do you think you are being followed by the FBI?
Islam bad implies America good?
DarrinS showing everybody the blind patriot and good Zionist that he is
Is now a good time to note that the Saudi Government rents an entire floor in the Trump World Center in New York?
I can. It was about as good as anyone could get got. The only reason it was scrapped was because it was Obama's, and you know it.
New leak claims Trump scrapped Iran nuclear deal 'to spite Obama'
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48978484
Vastly more than you can defend the Republican alternative.
What is the proposed Republican alternative deal? Be specific and as detailed as you can.
Admittedly, no one can tell with certainty which way Iran will go. It is true that Iran has a large number of people who want their government to decrease its isolation from the world and focus on economic advancement at home. But it is also true that this desire has been evident in Iran for thirty-five years, yet the Iranian leaders have held a tight and undiminished grip on Iran, successfully maintaining their brutal, theocratic dictatorship with little threat. Who’s to say this dictatorship will not prevail for another ten, twenty, or thirty years?
To me, the very real risk that Iran will not moderate and will, instead, use the agreement to pursue its nefarious goals is too great.
Therefore, I will vote to disapprove the agreement, not because I believe war is a viable or desirable option, nor to challenge the path of diplomacy. It is because I believe Iran will not change, and under this agreement it will be able to achieve its dual goals of eliminating sanctions while ultimately retaining its nuclear and non-nuclear power. Better to keep U.S. sanctions in place, strengthen them, enforce secondary sanctions on other nations, and pursue the hard-trodden path of diplomacy once more, difficult as it may be.
Saudi Military: 227,000
Iranian: 523,000 with 1,300,000 in reserves.
Saudi military capability has been stretched in Yemen, against a relatively small insurgency, and depends VERY heavily on US logistics. It is technologically superior, but that capability is "thin". The Saudis lack the industrial base or logistical base to support that army in the field for any length of time.
It cannot effectively fight a two front war without even more significant help. A full on war would see Saudi oil production effectively halted, as well as risks of an outright sectarian war that goes beyond national boundaries.
Further, Iran is four times larger than Iraq, and has been preparing to meet the US for four decades. It took months of sustained bombing to knock Iraqi capabilities down.
If you think it will be some kind of "easy" fight, you are probably a Trump voter.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)