Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 58
  1. #26
    Enemy of the System Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Post Count
    24,579
    Bowen, definitely. Not to take away from Verde, but Bowen defended 1-4, while Verde could only do until 3. Also, Bowen always defended the best scorers on the opposing team. Verde could do it, but more often than not he was used on the secondary wing scorers. There were matchups though that he did get first crack at the primary scorers.
    because he was the 2nd best wing defender in his own starting lineup.


    Bruce started alongside Steve Smith, Hedo Turkoglu (!), Brent Barry and Michael Finley, pretty much non defenders, and we still regularly held teams in the 70s and 80s and low 90s... Bruce all day.

  2. #27
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,357
    Many times we hear "that guy couldn't play in this new NBA era". Most times it's not true but with Bruce I think that's right.

    Old rules allowed Bruce to play defense in a way that he couldn't do it now.

    Bruce was amazing but prime Danny was an all-time one on one defender in this new league. Sadly he was very underrated.
    Why are Kawhi-stans trying to prop up Danny over Bruce? Just because they were traded away together doesn't mean that true Spurs fans don't appreciate Danny Green's contributions to the organization. Spurs loved them some D-Verde, he never quit on the team, unlike Nephew.

  3. #28
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    30,994
    because he was the 2nd best wing defender in his own starting lineup.


    Bruce started alongside Steve Smith, Hedo Turkoglu (!), Brent Barry and Michael Finley, pretty much non defenders, and we still regularly held teams in the 70s and 80s and low 90s... Bruce all day.
    That was because of pace. The whole way guys played D back then was different too. Folks have a bad idea that it was better, but it actually was just different. Guys iso'd way more back then, and good D was just making it harder for the guy to get his number, to make him work and get in his head. Guys like Dirk and Nash weren't particularly bothered by Bowen at all, but people remember him checking them because that's the standard for perimeter D the Spurs had. In the Medium Three era, they were able to demolish perimeter scorers in a way Bowen really didn't do. That's a lot to do with Green's and Leonard's talent, but it has a ton to do with how team defense had evolved too. Bowen-esque D just isn't important any more. The dirty play and mind games get techs and flagrants at a much higher rate. Now, rather than making guys work, teams focus on not allowing shots in efficient areas. That's why Murray is considered to be the Spurs' best perimeter defender despite White being a far better one-on-one defender.

    Danny has a great argument against Bruce even before you add in things like transition D where Green is obviously better.

  4. #29
    Veteran Floyd Pacquiao's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    6,851
    A lot of folks have a really skewed idea of who Bruce was. He was more inconsistent shooting than a lot people remember, and his D wasn't as effective. He and Danny are both men of their times on both sides of the ball.

  5. #30
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,006
    Bruce's prime years as a starter also translated to the best 5 year run in Spurs history...2003 to 2007. The Spurs didn't 'ship again until Kawhi developed enough to fill Bruce's defensive shoes. Not a coincidence. Danny was a great Spur, but no Bruce Bowen.

  6. #31
    Veteran barakz21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Post Count
    1,369
    because he was the 2nd best wing defender in his own starting lineup.


    Bruce started alongside Steve Smith, Hedo Turkoglu (!), Brent Barry and Michael Finley, pretty much non defenders, and we still regularly held teams in the 70s and 80s and low 90s... Bruce all day.
    True, I just meant that Danny though capable enough was best used primarily on the secondary wing scorers. There were times though iirc that he was used on the primary scorer, depending on situations such as guarding the quicker wings or guards. Doesn’t change my stance on going with Bruce though.

  7. #32
    Veteran J_Paco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    2,866
    That was because of pace. The whole way guys played D back then was different too. Folks have a bad idea that it was better, but it actually was just different. Guys iso'd way more back then, and good D was just making it harder for the guy to get his number, to make him work and get in his head. Guys like Dirk and Nash weren't particularly bothered by Bowen at all, but people remember him checking them because that's the standard for perimeter D the Spurs had. In the Medium Three era, they were able to demolish perimeter scorers in a way Bowen really didn't do. That's a lot to do with Green's and Leonard's talent, but it has a ton to do with how team defense had evolved too. Bowen-esque D just isn't important any more. The dirty play and mind games get techs and flagrants at a much higher rate. Now, rather than making guys work, teams focus on not allowing shots in efficient areas. That's why Murray is considered to be the Spurs' best perimeter defender despite White being a far better one-on-one defender.

    Danny has a great argument against Bruce even before you add in things like transition D where Green is obviously better.
    Man, I would rebut everything you said but clearly you of the mindset that Green is equal or better. And just so you know, Bruce read scouting reports, tried to take away guys' "favorite spots" and funneled people into Duncan (much like Green/Leonard).

    He did more than just annoy people and use questionable tactics. But, I guess if you gotta prop up Green it makes sense to diminish Bowen's all - world defensive ability.

  8. #33
    Kori's nightmare SpurOutofTownFan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    4,381
    Not sure why these two players are even being compared to each other. Anyone who's seen their entire career play know it's Bowen all the way. It's almost like disrespectful TBQO WTF

  9. #34
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    In a vacuum Green is a far better player than Bruce.

    Bruce was a 3&D Guy but his 3 was never fuego.

    Defensively i think bowen is better but he also benefited from an era where rules favoured wing defenders


    Defense

    Bown>Danny

    overall contribution to franchise

    Bowen>


    Better player overall

    Danny>

  10. #35
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    Why are Kawhi-stans trying to prop up Danny over Bruce? Just because they were traded away together doesn't mean that true Spurs fans don't appreciate Danny Green's contributions to the organization. Spurs loved them some D-Verde, he never quit on the team, unlike Nephew.
    stop making every thread about Kawhi. Move on loser.

  11. #36
    6X ST MVP
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    81,091
    Bruce Bowen. Not even close.
    Fanboy needs attention though.

  12. #37
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    30,994
    Man, I would rebut everything you said but clearly you of the mindset that Green is equal or better.
    A terrible argument on your part. I gave my reasons for my stance. You didn't give any, but still claim you could. Then you say I'm the one just stuck in a mindset.

    And just so you know, Bruce read scouting reports, tried to take away guys' "favorite spots" and funneled people into Duncan (much like Green/Leonard).
    Um, I have no idea why you think this is an argument. Anyone with a brain knows Bowen funneled to Duncan. If anything people who are propping up Bowen are overlooking he had arguably the best defensive player ever in his prime backing him up, whereas Green and Leonard had a Tim who wasn't nearly as mobile and needed guys funneled to his phonebooth.

    If you think defense is the same now as it was before, it's you who has no objectivity. The skills to guys who are going to iso from mid-range all the time like Kobe and Wade are different than those in the three-point/ball-movement era. The standards are different too.

    For example, in 2003, Bowen supposedly shut down Kobe, but Kobe had a TS% of 53.3 in that series against 55 for the year. Dirk that same playoffs had a TS% of 56.1 against one of 58.1.

    To contrast, Durant went from a TS% of 63.5 for his 2013-2014 campaign to one of 56 against the Spurs that WCF. (For full disclosure, Westbrook's TS% didn't change in the WCF versus the season.)

    In 2005, Nash dropped from 60.6 to 57.5 and his AST% dropped from 49 to 40, but his USG% ed and his TOV% actually went down, implying that Nash had to create more on his own, shot poorer shots instead of passing, and had a lower efficiency as a result. I'm sure Bowen did his job, but closing down passing lanes to teammates would have been the whole team's responsibility, not just whomever was directly checking Nash.

    In 2013, Curry dropped from 58.9 to 50.6 in TS%, 31.1 to 28.7 in AST% and only had a drop of .7 to his TOV. This suggests that defending Curry wasn't the team-wide goal it became in later years. Steph's USG only went up by .4 percent. They didn't make Curry shoot; they didn't make him pass. They just played Green on him. The numbers actually look better for Curry than they were. He was something like 3/29 against Green before he had his injury. That's an insane lock-down.

    Danny wasn't perfect or anything. He sometimes had lapses here and there, and Chris Paul scored on him to win the series in 2015. My point is that people remember Bowen for HOW he defended, the aesthetics of it. They don't remember him for the results, which were not "locking guys down" if the stats can be believed. Guys pretty much did their things against him, but they did those things frustrated and exhausted. The M3 Spurs weren't like that. Opposing guards didn't leave the games against SA thinking the Spurs were dirty or cheap. They didn't try to fight the Spurs on the court or anything like that. No, they'd go up and down the court and just shoot terribly before the buzzer sounded and they'd shake hands with no ill will. The 2014 Spurs might have been the best iteration of the team ever, and they were that without needing that mental "edge" most defensive teams like the Grizzlies needed.

  13. #38
    Spur for life YGWHI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    6,332
    Why are Kawhi-stans trying to prop up Danny over Bruce? Just because they were traded away together doesn't mean that true Spurs fans don't appreciate Danny Green's contributions to the organization. Spurs loved them some D-Verde, he never quit on the team, unlike Nephew.
    Your answer has nothing to do with my point.

    Again, Bruce was a great defender but do you really think that Bruce could play defense in 2019 in the same way he did in early 2000's? In this new perimeter-oriented league and the new rules that protect guards and shooters? I don't think so.

  14. #39
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,330
    danny green was a fkn scrub without kawhi covering his weaknesses, most of his defensive stats is blindsind weakspot the opponent...how many times did this clown jump on pumpfakes?

  15. #40
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    1
    Bruce and Danny doesn't even come close.

  16. #41
    Veteran RC_Drunkford's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Post Count
    11,572
    Many times we hear "that guy couldn't play in this new NBA era". Most times it's not true but with Bruce I think that's right.

    Old rules allowed Bruce to play defense in a way that he couldn't do it now.

    Bruce was amazing but prime Danny was an all

    lay off the crack pipe Jabari. Bruce Bowen made NBA All-Defensive first team 5 times in a row. He is the all-time great defender, not Danny. Bowen is a defensive legend. And this ain't about comparing eras neither. Danny never had to guard prime Kobe or prime Nowitzki and he didn't even play for the Spurs in 2019

  17. #42
    Spur for life YGWHI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    6,332
    Danny never had to guard prime Kobe or prime Nowitzki
    I watched Danny guarding Curry, the best shooter in NBA history and KD a way better player than Kobe.

  18. #43
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,357
    Your answer has nothing to do with my point.

    Again, Bruce was a great defender but do you really think that Bruce could play defense in 2019 in the same way he did in early 2000's? In this new perimeter-oriented league and the new rules that protect guards and shooters? I don't think so.
    Why not? Bruce's footwork was the basis of his defensive advantage. His lateral footspeed was ELITE (and it should be bolded and underlined for emphasis). His ball denial was ELITE as well. You, like so many others are trying to suggest that Bowen's advantage was gained from handchecking and other "get-under-your skin" tactics he employed. While I'm not in denial about his use of such tactics, THEY intrinsically were not the basis of his defensive skill. Otherwise you're just equating him to a glorified thug - and have adopted the media narrative on him.

  19. #44
    Chopper Ed Helicopter Jones's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    14,006
    In a vacuum Green is a far better player than Bruce.

    Bruce was a 3&D Guy but his 3 was never fuego.

    Defensively i think bowen is better but he also benefited from an era where rules favoured wing defenders


    Defense

    Bown>Danny

    overall contribution to franchise

    Bowen>


    Better player overall

    Danny>
    Bruce led the league in 3 point percentage in '03 and averaged well over 200 attempts per season during his prime years. Not sure you can really point to 3 point shooting and say that's what made Green better. Danny never honed his dribbling, never was a great passer, and certainly didn't put the same fear in his opponents on the defensive side of the ball that Bruce did.

    I'd say Bowen>Green all day long, no matter how you slice the contribution pie.

  20. #45
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    905
    Bowen hands down.

    Never forget his defense on Lebron in 2007

  21. #46
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    2,941
    Love Danny, but imo Bruce was more consistent, not necessarily shooting wise (both streaky) but in terms of defensive focus. Just don't remember Bruce being in the wrong spot or committing a stupid foul as often as Danny, unfortunately there aren't good stats for defense.

    Also re: eras, is 12-15 really comparable to 16-present? with Bruce it's hard to tell if his drop off was because of age or the handcheck rules, with Danny there is a similar drop off as the style becomes more and more offense oriented but he is much younger than Bruce was. Why is it a given that Danny could fare well in the 2000s iso era, but impossible to consider Bruce being as (in)effective as everyone else is now?

  22. #47
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    30,994
    Bowen hands down.

    Never forget his defense on Lebron in 2007
    You've apparently already forgotten it if you don't remember what Duncan did to stop James in that series.

  23. #48
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,357
    You've apparently already forgotten it if you don't remember what Duncan did to stop James in that series.
    What is your issue against Bowen?

    I happen to love both Bowen and Danny. But Bruce's defensive style was simply more consistent. Yeah, yeah, we understand that he played alongside a younger version of Duncan and that allowed any defensive lapses on Bowen's part to be offset by the man in the middle. But that is no knock on him.

    Sure, Danny is an elite blocker for a shooting guard and his transition D is also elite. But Bowen's ball denial and positioning was "textbook" even if it rarely looked picture perfect due to the way that Bowen often hyper-shuffled his feet. Bowen always kept a hand on his opponent's face. As others have noted, his wing mates were more often than not defensively-deficient. Whereas Danny had the benefit of playing his best years alongside one of the best perimeter defenders of all-time in Kawhi. But whatever, this is about as subjective as a discussion can get.

  24. #49
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    30,994
    What is your issue against Bowen?
    You don't have to hate Bowen to think Green is comparable or better. Danny has some of the best impact stats ever for a role-player. He already has two rings. He's played with multiple different stars on multiple teams and still puts up great defensive numbers.

    But Bruce's defensive style was simply more consistent. Yeah, yeah, we understand that he played alongside a younger version of Duncan and that allowed any defensive lapses on Bowen's part to be offset by the man in the middle. But that is no knock on him.
    Bruce's defense was only "more consistent", because the standard for what good D was back then was qualitative, not quan ative. I've already gone over the stats to show that Bowen didn't "lock guys down" like people think he did. He hounded then, infuriated them, threw them off their games, but he didn't actually make them significantly less efficient. I don't mean to say Bruce didn't do very good jobs defensively, but simply put, the best era for Spurs D was with Green and Leonard, not with Bowen.

    Sure, Danny is an elite blocker for a shooting guard and his transition D is also elite. But Bowen's ball denial and positioning was "textbook" even if it rarely looked picture perfect due to the way that Bowen often hyper-shuffled his feet. Bowen always kept a hand on his opponent's face. As others have noted, his wing mates were more often than not defensively-deficient. Whereas Danny had the benefit of playing his best years alongside one of the best perimeter defenders of all-time in Kawhi. But whatever, this is about as subjective as a discussion can get.
    In the same post, you shrug off Prime Duncan's presence while trying to use Kawhi's as an excuse (which it's not, since Green was elite defensively without Kawhi in 2017 and with Leonard taking a huge step back on that end last season). It's fine that you want to describe what made Bowen good, but you can easily do the same for Green. Danny isn't just incidentally a great shot-blocker. He has tremendous anticipation with very quick hops. He might not be the same mental defender that Bruce was, but he's a tremendous instinctual defender. The dude shut down Durant in the closing game in 2014. He stifled Wade in the Finals that year. He didn't do it the same way that Bowen did to his guys, but that doesn't mean he was less effective, because he wasn't.

    Green was the second-ranked player in RAPM last season ... in the entire league.

    You made the argument that Bowen was anywhere near the offensive player Green is. That's so wrong, it's hard to know where to go with it. There's a really big gap between them. Bowen only shot from the corners, and even then his percentage there -- 42.4 -- is lower than Danny's 42.6. If you just count Danny's Spur production (which I consider unfair since he didn't struggle like Bowen did on other teams but whatever), Green drops behind Bowen at 41.1 percent. However, Bowen shot 84 percent of his threes from the corners, meaning his non-corner 3P% was 30.6. That compares really poorly to Danny's 39-percent performance away from the corners (39.2 for his career and 38.8 just with SA). Bruce had nothing on Green as a shooter. He was more like PJ Tucker. You also implied that Bruce was better inside the arc. Also not true. Green is about a 51-percent shooter inside the arc. Not great, but he's at least 59 percent around the rim. Bruce was 48 percent inside 10 feet and 57 percent around the rim. Bowen did turn the ball over less though.

    Overall, I just don't see how anyone could make the argument for Bowen being a better player than Green. Statistically, it's not close anymore. The only recourse for Bowen is qualitative, but as mentioned (to basically skip the whole number thing, since that isn't really refutable anymore) previously, that line of reasoning is mostly based on people's bias toward that era of Spurs basketball. Bruce was certainly a really good defender, and he deserves his praise for helping the team win les. But he was really more of a man of his era than people want to admit. What he showed in his career would not have been enough to meet with the demands of the modern NBA. He's far from the only really good player for which that is true. Maybe in the modern NBA, he could have adjusted. But his lack of offensive versatility would have been a huge hill to climb, considering how hard he had to work to even be a good corner shooter. Folks have this crystallized view of Bowen that removes almost all of his major drawbacks. They don't do the same with Green. That's not because of objective reality though.

  25. #50
    Corpus Christi Spurs Fan Phenomanul's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    10,357
    You lost me when you stated that the Spurs best defensive teams were with Danny and Kawhi.

    The 2004 Spurs and 1999 Spurs didn’t include either of those players. The 2003-2006 Spurs were great defensively and they all had a Duncan anchored defense with Bowen as the de facto perimeter defender...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •