trump impeachment watch thread

[hater]

demo s

getting obliterated right nowon primetime

[spurraider21]

Isn’t that exactly what you guys are doing??

Thanks for making my point for me, homie. Prahps.

no. i dont have time to watch the hearings live during the work day. but its not that difficult to find transcripts of the proceedings posted online, which i read/skim through at night at my leisure

i do pop in here during the day to get some of the headlines/soundbites and reactions.

you have told us that you have a single source filter everything for you and spit out a convenient narrative that you adopt wholesale, since you cant be bothered to do your own analysis/thinking and come to your own conclusion. for whatever reason you're willing to display your gullibility to that degree and yet are reluctant to divulge this source. it implies embarrassment as you know its probably ridiculous

[hater]

called this

looking like a re ed version of the Kavanqughty hearings

democats

[ChumpDumper]

hater is pego's source

[Reck]

hater is pego's source

Called it!

[thispego]

Since he was just about to announce the investigations before the whistleblower ruined the scheme, no-- it's really not good enough.

You do know that Trump could retaliate if Zelensky said or says bad things about Trump, right?

You say that as if it’s a matter of fact. CNN believed (hoped) that Zelensky might say something like in a scheduled interview, but the interview never happened. Zelensky never confirmed CNN’s belief, sooo....? You got something different?

Zelensky would have been a much more effective whistleblower imvho “hey this guy is threatening to withhold aid if we don’t investigate a political opponent!”. Why has Zelensky NEVER said this? Why has he said the exact opposite of what trump is being accused of?”

doesn’t hold water, bruh

[ChumpDumper]

You say that as if it’s a matter of fact. CNN believed (hoped) that Zelensky might say something like in a scheduled interview, but the interview never happened. Zelensky never confirmed CNN’s belief, sooo....? You got something different?

Zelensky would have been a much more effective whistleblower imvho “hey this guy is threatening to withhold aid if we don’t investigate a political opponent!”. Why has Zelensky NEVER said this? Why has he said the exact opposite of what trump is being accused of?”

doesn’t hold water, bruh

I just told you Trump could retaliate and you'd support that too.

What would Zelensky gain from saying Trump is holding the aid hostage?

Why was aid held hostage in the first place and why was it only released after the whistleblower report became known?

Simple questions.

[thispego]

no. i dont have time to watch the hearings live during the work day. but its not that difficult to find transcripts of the proceedings posted online, which i read/skim through at night at my leisure

i do pop in here during the day to get some of the headlines/soundbites and reactions.

you have told us that you have a single source filter everything for you and spit out a convenient narrative that you adopt wholesale, since you cant be bothered to do your own analysis/thinking and come to your own conclusion. for whatever reason you're willing to display your gullibility to that degree and yet are reluctant to divulge this source. it implies embarrassment as you know its probably ridiculous

Your partisan impeachment coverage/recap ain’t doing you any favors, either, bro

[thispego]

I just told you Trump could retaliate and you'd support that too.

What would Zelensky gain from saying Trump is holding the aid hostage?

Why was aid held hostage in the first place and why was it only released after the whistleblower report became known?

Simple questions.

The new Ukrainian leadership was being vetted for corruption that has plagued previous leadership. Standard withholding.

How exactly could Trump retaliate? What cards would Trump hold if Zelensky outed him for extortion? None. Trump would be finished and he’d already be out.

[Reck]

GYM JORDAN ALL CAPPING

[ChumpDumper]

The new Ukrainian leadership was being vetted for corruption that has plagued previous leadership. Standard withholding.

Standard?

The DoD approved of their corruption fighting in April. What other vetting was there?

And show me the other instances where this was standard.

How exactly could Trump retaliate? What cards would Trump hold if Zelensky outed him for extortion? None. Trump would be finished and he’d already be out.

He could just call him a liar and say they're too corrupt to help. You would agree.

[LkrFan]

let’s see. it takes a simple House majority to impeach Trump.
a 2/3 Senate majority to find Trump guilty

Dem House Majority = Check.
Dem Senate super-majority = Nope

I think we know what’s most likely going to happen. Let’s see who does or doesn’t cross the aisle.

demo s

getting obliterated right nowon primetime

[benefactor]

hater is pego's source

seems legit

[Blake]

A new shill is born

[ChumpDumper]

A new shill is born

she just made Tedra Cobb a star.

[Reck]

Trump should go do rallies for her.

[spurraider21]

Your partisan impeachment coverage/recap ain’t doing you any favors, either, bro

what impeachment coverage/recap are you referring to?

[spurraider21]

A new shill is born

what did she accomplish?

doesnt change the fact that trump withheld aid from them unless they decided to investigate biden's son for his own political benefit, as opposed to any purpose for the benefit of the US

[boutons_deux]

Elise getting destroyed by her campaign opponent and spending

one and done, this silly lady

[Winehole23]

The president's personal lawyer, who used his connection to POTUS as well as those of his business partners Fruman and Parnas to try to get Ukraine to investigate political corruption in Ukraine's energy sector, is being investigated for corrupt business dealings with a Ukrainian energy company, along with his business buddies Fruman and Parnas, who are facing charges of campaign finance crimes -- to wit, illegal foreign contributions to DJT.

https://apnews.com/196b3007d9db4747b55f9019f0f9da91

[boutons_deux]

Nunes keeps referring to the impeachment hearing as a “drug deal.” It’s not as clever as he thinks.

He thinks he’s owning the libs. He’s really owning himself.

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes (R-CA) derisively referred to the impeachment inquiry as a “drug deal” — a turn of phrase

meant to depict Democrats as being up to something illicit.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...ring-drug-deal

[Chris]

[Chris]

[Chris]

[Spurs Homer]

Schiff destroying the corrupt 40% american traitors in the USA

THAT was a “perfect” summation

unlike trumps perfect bribery/extortion phone call