Reply With Quote
And you choose to believe a guy who's indicted for fraud that has already lied to the DOJ who's on conspiracy theory pusher Maddow's showAn unsworn tweet from someone accused of wrongdoing.
Totally believable. To you.
There isn't even a crime listed in the articles of impeachment
What crime are you referring to if he loses in November? Be specific.
And you choose to believe a guy who's indicted for fraud that has already lied to the DOJ who's on conspiracy theory pusher Maddow's showAn unsworn tweet from someone accused of wrongdoing.
Totally believable. To you.
Obstruction of justice you dumb mother erThere isn't even a crime listed in the articles of impeachment
What crime are you referring to if he loses in November? Be specific.
The Impoundment Control Act of 1974.There isn't even a crime listed in the articles of impeachment
What crime are you referring to if he loses in November? Be specific.
I believe you're wrong about it not being included in the House's submission.
TSA pretending there's no corroborating paper trail.
Ignorance is a shield.
obstruction of Congressional oversight of the Exec is an impeachable offenseThere isn't even a crime listed in the articles of impeachment
What crime are you referring to if he loses in November? Be specific.
Just like the English prick Piers Morgan asking on the The View (or somewhere?) repeatedly "where the racism?" around the Sussexes decision to step away from their royal rolls, pretending he didn't know about UK tabloids and other sources really pissed that "wog" Megan Markle's negritude was polluting the royal blood line.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/they
or you could simply look at the article, posted. Parnas and Trump donor/toady Hyde.
*ding*
*ding*
And you chose to believe the guy with the fraud university, the fraud steaks, the fraud condo sales, the fraud hotel construction, and the fraud charity.And you choose to believe a guy who's indicted for fraud that has already lied to the DOJ who's on conspiracy theory pusher Maddow's show
Last edited by RandomGuy; 01-16-2020 at 02:43 PM. Reason: typo
And you choose to believe a guy who's indicted for fraud that has already lied to the DOJ who's on conspiracy theory pusher Maddow's show
Funds were released before the end of the fiscal year. Try again.
What crime are you referring to if he loses in November? Be specific.
Where's my 2 grand got?Obstruction of justice you dumb mother er
Going to the courts isn't obstructing congressional oversight.
Not all the funds were released, the law was still broken according to the CBO. Try again.
You are aware impeachment and removal do not require any allegation that laws were broken, don't you?
Why would Trump's personal lawyer be in constant contact with this guy for months on end?And you choose to believe a guy who's indicted for fraud that has already lied to the DOJ who's on conspiracy theory pusher Maddow's show
Do tell, chuckle .
"he can't be believed because he is so shady" begs the question "why is the presidents lawyer neck deep with this guy?"
So many liars, cheats, and pedos in Trumps orbit...
Yet you never ask why that is.
TSA can't defend Trump's criminal scheme, all he can do is deflect, nitpick and namecall.
You realize this is an argument against dear leader, right?
No, of course you don't.
Timeline doesn't matter. The reason does.As
explained below, we conclude that OMB withheld the funds from obligation for an unauthorized reason in violation of the ICA.1
We also questionactions regarding funds appropriated to the Department of State (State) for security assistance to Ukraine.
You look like an asshole here, making more excuses for your child-raping hero.The Cons ution specifically vests Congress with the power of the purse, providing
that “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
Appropriations made by Law.” U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 7. The Cons ution also
vests all legislative powers in Congress and sets forth the procedures of
bicameralism and presentment, through which the President may accept or veto a
bill passed by both Houses of Congress, and Congress may subsequently override a
presidential veto. Id., art. I, § 7, cl. 2, 3. The President is not vested with the power
to ignore or amend any such duly enacted law. See Clinton v. City of New York,
524 U.S. 417, 438 (1998) (the Cons ution does not authorize the President “to
enact, to amend, or to repeal statutes”). Instead, he must “faithfully execute” the law
as Congress enacts it. U.S. Const., art. II, § 3.
An appropriations act is a law like any other; therefore, unless Congress has
enacted a law providing otherwise, the President must take care to ensure that
appropriations are prudently obligated during their period of availability. See
B-329092, Dec. 12, 2017 (the ICA operates on the premise that the President is
required to obligate funds appropriated by Congress, unless otherwise authorized to
withhold). In fact, Congress was concerned about the failure to prudently obligate
according to its Congressional prerogatives when it enacted and later amended the
ICA. See generally, H.R. Rep. No. 100-313, at 66–67 (1987); see also S. Rep. No.
93-688, at 75 (1974) (explaining that the objective was to assure that “the practice of
reserving funds does not become a vehicle for furthering Administration policies and
priorities at the expense of those decided by Congress”).
The Cons ution grants the President no unilateral authority
and the ones who have endorsed trump for 2020
Coincidence? Naaah
The hold was lifted on September 11th, before the end of the fiscal year.
You were the one that brought up crimes that Trump would be liable for if he loses in November not me. I am still waiting for you to explain how a GAO opinion is something Trump will be held criminally liable for once he's out of office. After you try and figure that one out let me know why Obama wasn't held criminally liable for GAO opinions when he was out of office.
Do you think the GAO is a court?
You look like an asshole here, making more excuses for your child-raping hero.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
