Russia collusion was a conspiracy theory. No harm in seeing what started it.
they really are loading up on right wing media conspiracy theories.
Russia collusion was a conspiracy theory. No harm in seeing what started it.
Darrin is all-in on the right wing moonbat conspiracies.
I knew it.
This is hilarious:
Asking Putin about what he thinks is right and wrong with this ordeal based on US standards
On Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said he saw no evidence of pressure in Trump’s July conversation with Zelenskiy and added that there was nothing wrong with the U.S. president asking for an investigation into potential corruption.
Pavlov has zero interest in what prompted moonbat Russia collusion conspiracy.
It wasn't moonbat at all, considering Trump's son, son-in-law and campaign manager all actively tried to collude with agents of the Russian government. And all Flynn and Papadopoulos had to do was not lie to the feds. Then Dennison had to fire Comey to relieve the "pressure" of the investigation, which prolonged the investigation and rose it's profile exponentially.
All super normal and cheered on by Darrin.
And the result of all that? Womp womp.
Just let this new investigation play out. If there's nothing there, no big deal. Why protest so much?
you really are for this partisan, Trump-directed investigation occupying the time of the highest officials in the government with campaign workers like Giuliani and Gorka on a worldwide snipe hunt? Pressuring allies and withholding aid if they don't by into their right wing conspiracy theories?Just let this new investigation play out. If there's nothing there, no big deal. Why protest so much?
You want all that?
You see not one thing wrong with any of this?
Speak up.
Like what said
Just let this new investigation play out. If there's nothing there, no big deal. Why protest so much?
Do you not see even one thing wrong with how this "investigation" is being carried out?
Speak up.
Don't hedge.
Don't dodge.
Either you do you don't.
No
I'd like to know what started a years long investigation into a bat crazy Russia collusion conspiracy that turned out to be totally bunk.
Damn thing sent djohn into fetal position for a long time.
A spokesman for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., had acknowledged for the first time on Wednesday that the whistleblower alleging misconduct in the White House had reached out to Schiff's panel before filing a complaint -- prompting President Trump, in an extraordinary afternoon news conference at the White House, to accuse Schiff directly of helping write the do ent.
Schiff had previously claimed in a televised interview that "we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower." A Schiff spokesperson seemingly narrowed that claim late Wednesday, telling Fox News that Schiff himself "does not know the iden y of the whistleblower, and has not met with or spoken with the whistleblower or their counsel" for any reason.
"It shows that Schiff is a fraud. ... I think it's a scandal that he knew before," Trump said, as Finnish President Sauli Niinisto stood at an adjacent podium. "I'd go a step further. I'd say he probably helped write it. ... That's a big story. He knew long before, and he helped write it too. It's a scam."
On "Special Report," Bevan called the report "valuable" and also discussed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's apparent reticence to schedule a formal floor vote on impeachment.
He said Pelosi, D-Calif., has afforded herself maximum flexibility in that without the vote, her committees can issue subpoenas but the minority -- Republicans -- cannot pe ion for them.
On the flip side, he said, Republicans can tag the inquiry as mostly political because the San Francisco lawmaker has not taken the formal step of making it a "serious inquiry
Spoke up.
Didn't hedge.
Didn't dodge.
Of all the hills to choose to die on.
Congratulations? I guess.
Get a room you two
Haha, ducks making fun
There was a vote for this about a month ago or so, IIRC, it was approved along party lines. Not sure why people claim there was not.
Fox News legal analyst argues Trump has already admitted to ‘criminal behavior’ — and must be impeached
Andrew Napolitano strongly suggests President Donald Trump has committed an impeachable offense by withholding Ukraine military aid as leverage to seek campaign dirt on Joe Biden.
“The criminal behavior to which Trump has admitted is much more grave than anything alleged or unearthed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and much of what Mueller revealed was impeachable,” Napolitano wrote.
He lays out the definitions of federal law prohibiting the solicitation by a political campaign of anything of value from a foreign national or foreign government, along with bribery and witness intimidation.
“The president need not have committed a crime in order to be impeached,” Napolitano wrote, “but
he needs to have engaged in behavior that threatens the cons utional stability of the United States or the rule of law as we have come to know it.”
“Can the president put his own needs and wants above the nation’s? In a word: No,” Napolitano wrote.
“Is violating campaign finance law by involving a foreign government in an American presidential campaign an impeachable offense?
Yes, it is.”
He said the president doesn’t seem to understand the laws he has sworn to uphold, and he argued that impeachment was the only remedy to preserve those laws.
“It was to remedy just such reckless, cons utionally destructive behavior that impeachment was intended,” Napolitano wrote.
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/fox...e+Raw+Story%29
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/judg...AIhix3k24Boj3M
I don’t understand why people don’t see the shocking fact that the president of the US admitted he tried to get the president of a foreign country to essentially out a political opponent in OUR elections.
And then they are surprised when the foreign leader says its no big deal?
Is CC the only red team member who understands the significance...? he’s the only one I have seen (on the board) Maybe he does not consider himself on the red team so I got it all wrong. What I thought were very obvious standards of conduct have been ignored. This shows a complete lack of understanding of how our democracy and elections are supposed to function.
So next time you are at a party, take a dump in the middle of the floor while everyone watches. It’s standard conduct now.
Part of it is that what otherwise would be crazy behavior is now the new normal.
We’re also in a post-modern era in the sense that we no longer believe in truth or facts. It’s all relative. Facts get discounted or even ignored because we don’t trust the media. We also believe everyone, no matter how ignorant or uninformed, is en led to an opinion and to be heard on a playing field equal with those who are more informed or educated about particular topics. Modern politics is more like a sport where people cheer either team blue or red, gobbling up the narrative that supports their ideology and refusing to do the work to get educated. That’s how you get guys like twitter feed Chris who think tweets from a guy ambling for more followers count as political commentary. Or who discount commentary from, for example, a legal scholar opining that the president has committed an impeachable offense as “partisan” and therefore irrelevant.
his CULT
WILL NOT CARE!!!
When the impeachment trial gets to the phase where evidence needs to be presented...
compelling evidence....
they can just roll the tape of the criminal abusing his oath on tape
lololol
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)