Reply With Quote
Me too. I think Chris Wallace is a good journalist.
I agree. Wallace is super sharp.
Me too. I think Chris Wallace is a good journalist.
I too think he's a good journalist. Very strong interviewer.
That was painless.
See? We didn't die.
"I presumed they were interested."
Nathan89, who are some journalists you respect and like to read/watch?
“I swear I don’t even like Trump! I just hate the Dems and all lib s!” is of course the true sign of a diehard Trump supporter.
Trump’s big, ‘exonerating’ piece of Ukraine evidence takes a hit
President Trump’s Sept. 9 call with Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland is now the core of his Ukraine defense.
“I would say that means it’s all over.”
the call might not have actually taken place
possibility that Trump and Sondland did not actually speak on Sept. 9.
And the evidence is compelling:
- Trump has said he doesn’t remember the call.
- Text messages that Sondland said surrounded the call (between him and top Ukraine diplomat William B. Taylor Jr.) indicate the call would have taken place between 12:31 a.m. Eastern time and 5:19 a.m. Eastern time on Sept. 9.
- A colleague of Sondland’s in Brussels said Sondland was comfortable calling Trump only after 7:30 a.m.
- The White House has found no record of a Sept. 9 call between Trump and Sondland.
- Sondland isn’t understood to have Trump’s personal cellphone number, meaning there should be a record of the call.
- Sondland himself testified he was “pretty sure” the call was on Sept. 9, but that he wasn’t completely sure because the White House didn’t provide him records. He also said he couldn’t “specifically recall if I had one or two phone calls” with Trump between Sept. 6 and Sept. 9.
- Sondland’s testimony has been dodgy — to say the least — before.
Republicans have already stretched Sondland’s version of a Sept. 9 call,
ignoring Trump’s motivation to deny a quid pro quo on it
and the fact that, even on the same call, he made clear he wanted more than “nothing.”
But the Morrison and Taylor recollections of the Sept. 7 call indicate
Trump was demanding far more than just Zelensky doing “the right thing”;
he was demanding Ukraine do his specific investigations.
And if that’s really the call Sondland remembered, it’s even less exonerating than Republicans have argued it was.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/28/trumps-big-exonerating-piece-ukraine-evidence-takes-hit/?utm_campaign=post_most&utm_medium=Email&utm_sourc e=Newsletter&wpisrc=nl_most&wpmm=1
Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-28-2019 at 12:12 PM.
Seems like above everything else they love Dennison's victimhood and grievance.
mono and chump trollin hard on Thanksgiving
I'm very serious about that tbh.
The chance to be at once an asshole and a victim vicariously seems to be the main selling point for Dennison supporters.
I'll let you prove it with your next few posts.
Even the lib poll showing Millennials more against impeachment and this phony hearing.
Bring on the Senate trial.
Don simply picking up more votes since this whole charade started.
Ah yes, another “but I don’t even like Trump!” guy who supports and defends everything Trump does
Let's see that poll.
Ex-prosecutor says Giuliani could go down for illegal foreign lobbying — even if he wasn’t paid
former federal prosecutor Elie Honig broke down the legal problems facing President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani,
“The problems for Rudy Giuliani just keep stacking up. Let’s rewind.
Parnas is indicted.
Rudy Giuliani himself is being investigated by the Southern District, which he used to lead.
We know that that whopper subpoena got served the other day
relating to Rudy’s business, listing all the crimes.”
“The potential crime I see here is … [the] Foreign Agents Registration Act.
But you don’t need to have a payment.
You can still be lobbying for free, for other consideration,
for in exchange of favors as could have happened here as well.
So it’s just one more iron in the fire for Rudy.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/ex-prosecutor-says-giuliani-could-go-down-for-illegal-foreign-lobbying-even-if-he-wasnt-paid/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
It's amazing what happens when the dems and the propagandists don't control 100% of the narrative.
You guys ever find that poll you're talking about?
I haven't seen the poll he's referring to but I've seen others regarding other groups. Problem is the dems and their media partners were spewing their narrative unchallenged for a long time so they still have many duped. Just like they still have people duped from the russia propaganda.
So anecdotes.
Problem is you guys never actually post anything outside your fantasies.
Mono what did Trump do that was illegal snd what’s the evidence?
Spoken like a true Trump
Any different from schiff’s collection of testimonies?
Spoken like a true Trump
Good answer. Thorough explanation of your position, tbh
You got that poll?Any different from schiff’s collection of testimonies?
Better yet got that narrative for Dennison's actions RE: Ukraine that makes any sense?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
