Are you really expecting a serious reply from Darrin after see that gif?
Devin's Cow is going to have fun with that.
Are you really expecting a serious reply from Darrin after see that gif?
You're a
Russian DOLLS!
darrin with the victory lap over a report that found no anti-trump bias influencing any decisions
Guey, you spelled out a fantasy about the 75 year old POTUS getting butt raped in prison. You gave a precise amount of BBC he'd receive.
I pointed that out and you're calling me a ? How does that make sense in your hecho-en-Meheeco mind, Juanita?
You stupid.
Anyone see that oval ofc pic with lavrov standing behind trump?
if i was the secret svc agent responsible for that
id ing retire
any president who invites a russian into the oval office and then is comfortable enough to sit down and calmly pose for a pic with our biggest enemy standing behind him
is either plain ing stupid
or does NOT consider russia worth being aware of - and on top of his game
either way
its ing disgraceful
if i really wanted to give trump the benefit of the doubt
id say - fire the head of secret service assigned on that detail
but i think it is no accident that the russian achieved the exact pic he wanted sent to russia
let that sink in
Still do. Conservative narratives need a hate/outrage target. Better if it is a woman, it seems.
It reminds me nothing so much of the Daily Hate from 1984.
at home too
From NY Time email
What happened today
- The House Judiciary Committee met at 7 p.m. Eastern for a somewhat unusual evening gathering, during which each of the 41 members of the committee will get a chance to argue for or against Mr. Trump’s impeachment.
- Tonight’s session, which could go until after midnight, is part of a multiday meeting to debate, amend and vote on the articles of impeachment proposed by Democrats. The panel will reconvene tomorrow morning, and is expected to approve the articles later in the day, sending them for a vote before the full House.
Why on earth are they doing it so late tonight?
House rules allow all 41 members of the committee — 24 Democrats and 17 Republicans — to make five-minute opening statements, which means it’s going to take hours just to get to the starting point of debate. Democrats wanted to get the speechifying over with tonight, then resume in the morning with the actual work of modifying the articles.
What will the lawmakers be doing?
They’re conducting an impeachment version of a typical legislative process called a “markup,” which gives members of Congress a chance to modify bills with amendments. Since the articles of impeachment we saw yesterday were just drafts, lawmakers will use tonight and tomorrow to finalize the text.
What a bunch of brain dead assholes--they're ok losing family over a s bag like trump---and why are all these old ass guys so ready to start a 2nd civil war? they're old wrinkled asses would be the first to get shot
MSNBC’s Morning Joe reveals one cons utional change that must be made if US survives Trump
“This is the language that Roy Cohn used attacking the (Department of Justice) and the FBI back in the 1970s,
when the federal government caught Donald Trump and his father discriminating against minorities,
and he’s doing the same thing,” Scarborough said.
“But he’s the attorney general of the United States.”
one area where our system obviously needs to be checked has to do with
the appointing of an attorney general, and
I was saying this before Barr became the attorney general.”
If democracy holds against Trump, he said
changes must be made to prevent another Barr from serving the president’s interests instead of the Cons ution.
We just
can’t have any president having an attorney general who will protect them from criminal actions that they’ve taken.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/msnbcs-morning-joe-reveals-one-cons utional-change-that-must-be-made-if-us-survives-trump/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=3209
btw, here's another Repug bag as AG
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwin_Meese
and another Repug bag
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_N...sident_scandal
That's TSA's kinfolk. Show some respeck
Y'll rightwingnutjobs are filthy nasty
Viral Photos Don’t Show Impeachment Expert
Widely shared posts on Facebook purport to show photos of law professor Pamela Karlan, who testified in support of President Donald Trump’s impeachment, dressed in pro-feminist attire at two different events.
Karlan told us she did not attend either event.
Postscirculating on social media make the unsubstantiated claim that two different photos of women —
one wearing a pink Pussyhat,
the other dressed as “vagina lady” at a 2007 race
https://www.factcheck.org/2019/12/viral-photos-dont-show-impeachment-expert/
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-11-2019 at 10:14 PM.
I don't think they actually want a civil war. They're just being emo.
Trash's servile dogs are all bark, and no bite. 'em
Just copying our Dear Leader.
LA Times and now America's Newspaper calling for impeachment
When will San Antonio Express News follow suit?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)