PG, i don't need links for any damn thing tbh. obama was in office at the time of spygate so it started and happened under his watch!
i can't wait to see all the commies burn in but first a bullet in their heads will suffice!
I forgot to add
Best part was Nunes ting all over Schiff while sitting right next to him.
PG, i don't need links for any damn thing tbh. obama was in office at the time of spygate so it started and happened under his watch!
i can't wait to see all the commies burn in but first a bullet in their heads will suffice!
Darrin has a strange view point on this one.
Also thinking Nunes is capable of ting on anyone.
Of course.
Nothing impressed me. Why bring back the same dudes from their secret underground depositions? What was the point of all of this?
Did you read my post that you replied to?
Dems would've been better served keeping this "inquiry" in the basement. They (particularly Schiff) aren't a good look under public scrutiny.
of course what? you want to dismiss what i said... how exactly do you do that without blind faith in the dems tbh?
it's quite funny how you lefty's hate bringing up obama and his crimes as well as his directing of spygate/russiagate. don't live in the past right unless it's manafort and anyone else that has been apart of the trump campaign/admin.
well, it's a new age where we find the roaches from the past and shine a light on them for all to see.
This is about the impeachment of Trump, not about something Obama did not do.
How do you defend Trump and his phone call. Have you read it?
Then I answered your question.
I'm sure he saw an informative alt right YouTube telling him what he needs to know
Definitely what he is to avoid.
Dont discuss the phone call.
Or, everybody does this.
5 pgs of nothing... your assumption that i don't read is asinine. you think to highly of yourself and less of others and that's probably why your ex-wife cuckolded you because you assumed she wouldn't. i hope for nothing but the worst for you in life blaKKKe.
i read it weeks ago. there's no qpq whatsoever... in that call he specifically asks about crowdstrike, the server, and biden's corruption. he didn't push a qpq at all. point to it and show me where exactly then considering we read the same transcript.
you don't want our chief executive looking into past corruption? wtf?
better yet, you two girls can keep playing patty cake with each other instead.
It does not matter $ was used or not.
In the speech Trump asks the newly elected Ukrainian president to look into the Biden's. His political opponent in the upcoming election.
Thats all that needed to be said. And he said it 8 times. Trump can get the CIA and FBI to investigate, he and Rudy are not investigators. Or he can use the Ukrainian intelligence services which is what he did.
The rest is window dressing for the red team to get outed in 2020 along with Trump.
Do you understand why our cons ution was written by people who had exactly the same problems with the French and British. Even into the early 1800s?
Do you get this, or do you want our elections to become a global election?
Dems are managing to NOT impeach Trump and kill Biden's campaign simultaneously.
You don't think people are going to compare/contrast the "phone call" with video of Biden bragging about getting the prosecutor fired? Smh
Trump is our current president.
He asked a foreign country to interfere in our elections. He also apparently withheld for some time $ to get an agreement.
Please defend this.
I don't agree with your premise, so there's nothing to defend.
Still funny that Darrin ever pretended to dislike Trump
Basically everything is known.
If the Republicans are serious about it, they can subpoena Chalupa Grande to the Senate at any time. She will be more than happy to testify.
Why haven't they done that, TSA?
Explain.
Lol, sock puppet burner account.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)